Effect of prophylactic closure on adverse events after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: A meta‐analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1869-1877
Author(s):  
Mingqing Liu ◽  
Yangyu Zhang ◽  
Yueqi Wang ◽  
He Zhu ◽  
Hong Xu
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

scholarly journals Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 04 (10) ◽  
pp. E1030-E1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Akintoye ◽  
Nitin Kumar ◽  
Hiroyuki Aihara ◽  
Hala Nas ◽  
Christopher Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Risk factors for adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana B. Santos ◽  
Moacyr R.C. Nobre ◽  
Cleyton Z. Oliveira ◽  
Adriana V . Safatle-Ribeiro ◽  
Fabio Kawaguti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Su1621 Risk Factors for Adverse Events After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB368
Author(s):  
Hideaki Harada ◽  
Satoshi Suehiro ◽  
Daisuke Murakami ◽  
Ryoutarou Nakahara ◽  
Takanori Shimizu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

927 Traction-Assisted Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Reduces Procedure Time and Risk of Adverse Events: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. S541-S542
Author(s):  
Chawin Lopimpisuth ◽  
Malorie Simons ◽  
Klaorat Prasongdee ◽  
Saowanee Ngamruengphong
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

scholarly journals Compared the effectiveness and safety of different methods of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueping Wu ◽  
Chenglong Ye ◽  
Zhongsheng Cao ◽  
Xiangcheng Hu ◽  
Wensheng Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Background: Traditional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has developed different methods, such as pocket method(P-ESD), traction-assisted method(T-ESD) and Hybrid method(H-ESD). In this meta-analysis, the benefits and drawbacks of different ESD methods were discussed and ranked. Study design: Studies comparing different methods of colorectal ESD were searched by PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The study was conducted for five endpoints: en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, operation time, dissection speed, and adverse events rate. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed through Rev Man 5.4 and Stata 16.0. The quality of all included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, including 7 RCTs and 19 non-RCTs, with a total of 3002 patients. The pooled analysis showed that the en bloc resection rate of H-ESD was significantly lower than C-ESD, P-ESD and T-ESD [RR=0.28, 95%CI (0.12, 0.65); RR = 0.11, 95% CI (0.03, 0.44); RR = 8.28, 95% CI (2.50, 27.42)]. Compared with C-ESD, the operation time of H-ESD and T-ESD was significantly shorter [MD=-21.83, 95%CI (-34.76, -8.90); MD=-23.8, 95%CI (-32.55, -15.06)]. Meanwhile, the operation time of T-ESD was also significantly shorter than P-ESD [MD=-18.74, 95%CI (-31.93, -5.54)]. The dissection speed of T-ESD was significantly faster than C-ESD [MD=6.26, 95%CI (2.29, 10.23)]. Conclusion: P-ESD and T-ESD are probably the two best methods of colorectal ESD at present. The advantages of P-ESD are high en bloc resection rate and low incidence of adverse events. The advantages of T-ESD are rapid dissection and short operation time.

Su1664 Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: a Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. AB370-AB371
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Akintoye ◽  
Nitin Kumar ◽  
Christopher C. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document