scholarly journals Compared the effectiveness and safety of different methods of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueping Wu ◽  
Chenglong Ye ◽  
Zhongsheng Cao ◽  
Xiangcheng Hu ◽  
Wensheng Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Background: Traditional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has developed different methods, such as pocket method(P-ESD), traction-assisted method(T-ESD) and Hybrid method(H-ESD). In this meta-analysis, the benefits and drawbacks of different ESD methods were discussed and ranked. Study design: Studies comparing different methods of colorectal ESD were searched by PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The study was conducted for five endpoints: en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, operation time, dissection speed, and adverse events rate. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were performed through Rev Man 5.4 and Stata 16.0. The quality of all included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, including 7 RCTs and 19 non-RCTs, with a total of 3002 patients. The pooled analysis showed that the en bloc resection rate of H-ESD was significantly lower than C-ESD, P-ESD and T-ESD [RR=0.28, 95%CI (0.12, 0.65); RR = 0.11, 95% CI (0.03, 0.44); RR = 8.28, 95% CI (2.50, 27.42)]. Compared with C-ESD, the operation time of H-ESD and T-ESD was significantly shorter [MD=-21.83, 95%CI (-34.76, -8.90); MD=-23.8, 95%CI (-32.55, -15.06)]. Meanwhile, the operation time of T-ESD was also significantly shorter than P-ESD [MD=-18.74, 95%CI (-31.93, -5.54)]. The dissection speed of T-ESD was significantly faster than C-ESD [MD=6.26, 95%CI (2.29, 10.23)]. Conclusion: P-ESD and T-ESD are probably the two best methods of colorectal ESD at present. The advantages of P-ESD are high en bloc resection rate and low incidence of adverse events. The advantages of T-ESD are rapid dissection and short operation time.

Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared with conventional ESD for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. McCarty ◽  
Ahmad Najdat Bazarbashi ◽  
Christopher C. Thompson ◽  
Hiroyuki Aihara
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Procedure Duration

Abstract Background Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is increasingly utilized to overcome the complexity of conventional ESD. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of hybrid ESD for treatment of colorectal lesions. Methods Search strategies were developed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Pooled proportions were calculated with rates estimated using random effects models. Measured outcomes included en bloc resection, procedure-associated complications, recurrence, and need for surgery. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare effectiveness of conventional versus hybrid ESD. Results 16 studies (751 patients) were included with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) lesion size of 27.96 (10.55) mm. En bloc resection rate was 81.63 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 72.07 – 88.44; I2  = 80.89). Complications, recurrences, and need for surgery occurred in 7.74 % (95 %CI 4.78 – 12.31; I2  = 65.84), 4.52 % (95 %CI 1.40 – 13.65; I2  = 76.81), and 3.64 % (95 %CI 1.76 – 7.37; I2  = 15.52), respectively. Mean procedure duration was 48.83 (22.37) minutes. On subgroup analyses comparing outcomes for conventional (n = 1703) versus hybrid ESD (n = 497), procedure duration was significantly shorter for hybrid ESD (mean difference 18.45 minutes; P = 0.003), with lower complication rates (P = 0.04); however, hybrid ESD had lower en bloc resection rates (P < 0.001). There was no difference in rates of recurrence or surgery (P > 0.05). Conclusion While hybrid ESD was safe and effective for removal of colorectal lesions, with shorter procedure duration, fewer complications, and no difference in recurrence versus conventional ESD, hybrid ESD was associated with a lower en bloc resection rate.

scholarly journals Prevention and Management of Complications and Education in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 2511
Author(s):  
Yoshitsugu Misumi ◽  
Kouichi Nonaka
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Educational Methods ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Management Of Complications

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is considered superior to endoscopic mucosal resection as an endoscopic resection because of its higher en bloc resection rate, but it is more difficult to perform. As ESD techniques have become more common, and the range of treatment by ESD has expanded, the number of possible complications has also increased, and endoscopists need to manage them. In this report, we will review the management of critical complications, such as hemorrhage, perforation, and stenosis, and we will also discuss educational methods for acquiring and improving ESD skills.

scholarly journals Preoperative endoscopic predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis in colorectal tumors undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. E421-E430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uayporn Kaosombatwattana ◽  
Takeshi Yamamura ◽  
Julajak Limsrivilai ◽  
Masanao Nakamura ◽  
Somchai Leelakusolvong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Submucosal Fibrosis ◽  
Severe Fibrosis

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en bloc removal of colorectal neoplasms regardless of size. Submucosal fibrosis is a significant factor for technical difficulty and poor outcomes. We assessed the predictive factors for severe submucosal fibrosis and the ESD outcomes. Patients and methods Patients undergoing ESD from January 2006 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The degree of submucosal fibrosis was classified into three types: no fibrosis (F0), mild fibrosis (F1), and severe fibrosis (F2). F0 and F1 cases were grouped as non-severe fibrosis for comparison with the severe fibrosis group. Predictors of severe submucosal fibrosis and ESD outcomes were evaluated. Results ESD was performed in 524 lesions (60 % male; mean age, 67.8 years). Eighty lesions with severe fibrosis (15.3 %) were observed. The overall en bloc resection rate and curative resection rate were 94.3 % and 77.7 %, respectively. Rates of en bloc resection (91.2 % vs. 94.8 %, P = 0.2) and perforation (7.5 % vs. 5.6 %, P = 0.45) were no different between severe fibrosis and non-severe fibrosis groups. However, incidences of non-curative resection and low resection speed were significantly higher in the severe fibrosis group. Among protruding lesions, tumor height and volume were significantly greater in the severe counterparts. A diameter ≥ 40 mm, endoscopic finding of the tumor beyond fold, and fold convergence were independent risk factors for severe fibrosis. Conclusions Severe submucosal fibrosis is a significant risk factor for non-curative resection and a long procedural time. Tumor size and morphology might help to predict the severity of fibrosis.

Ten year experience of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms in a single center.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 104-104
Author(s):  
Hyungchul Park ◽  
Do Hoon Kim ◽  
Eun Jeong Gong ◽  
Hee Kyong Na ◽  
Ji Yong Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Difficult Procedure ◽  
Male To Female

104 Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of a superficial esophageal neoplasm (SEN) is a technically difficult procedure. We investigated the clinical outcomes of ESD to determine its feasibility and effectiveness for the treatment of SEN. Methods: Patients who underwent ESD for SEN between August 2005 and June 2014 were eligible for this study. The clinical features of patients and tumors, histopathologic characteristics, adverse events, results of endoscopic resection, and survival were investigated. Results: ESD was performed in 225 patients with 261 lesions, including 70 cases (26.8%) of dysplasias and 191 cases (73.2%) of squamous cell carcinomas. The median age was 65 years (range: 44–86 years), and the male to female ratio was 21.5:1. Median tumor size was 37 mm (range: 5–85 mm) and median procedure time was 45 minutes (range: 9–160 minutes). En bloc resection was performed in 245 of 261 lesions (93.9%), with complete resection in 234 lesions (89.7%) and curative resection in 201 lesions (77.0%). Adverse events occurred in 33 cases (12.6%), including bleeding (1.5%), perforation (4.6%), and stricture (6.5%). During a median follow-up period of 35.0 months (interquartile range: 18–62 months), none of the patients showed local recurrence. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 89.7% and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: ESD is a feasible and effective procedure for the treatment of SEN based on our 10-year experience, which showed favorable outcomes.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of S-O Clip-Assisted Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Haruka Fujinami ◽  
Akira Teramoto ◽  
Saeko Takahashi ◽  
Takayuki Ando ◽  
Shinya Kajiura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
The Right ◽  
Surgery Duration

This study aimed to assess the utility of the S-O clip during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We conducted a retrospective study on 185 patients who underwent colorectal ESD from January 2015 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two groups: before and after the introduction of the S-O clip. Forty-two patients underwent conventional ESD (CO group) and 29 patients underwent ESD using the S-O clip (SO group). We compared the surgery duration, dissection speed, en bloc resection rate, and complication rate between both groups. Compared with the CO group, the SO group had a significantly shorter surgery duration (70.7 ± 37.9 min vs. 51.2 ± 18.6 min; p = 0.017), a significantly higher dissection speed (15.1 ± 9.0 min vs. 26.3 ± 13.8 min; p < 0.001), a significantly higher en bloc resection rate (80.9% vs. 98.8%; p ≤ 0.001), and a significantly lower perforation rate (4.3% vs. 1.3%). In the right colon, the surgery duration was significantly shorter and the dissection speed was significantly higher in the SO group than in the CO group. Moreover, the rate of en bloc resection improved significantly in the right colon. S-O clip-assisted ESD reduces the procedure time and improves the treatment effects, especially in the right colon.

scholarly journals Scissor-type knife improves the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) among endoscopists without experience in ESD: a randomized ex vivo study

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (08) ◽  
pp. E1207-E1213
Author(s):  
Kavel Visrodia ◽  
Tarek Sawas ◽  
Liam Zakko ◽  
Juan Reyes Genere ◽  
Cadman Leggett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Muscle Injury ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Lower Proportion ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically challenging, difficult to learn, and carries a substantial risk of perforation, all of which remain significant barriers to its adoptability. We aimed to determine whether use of a novel scissor-type knife improved efficacy and safety among novice performers of ESD. Materials and methods Following a brief didactic session on ESD, participants performed ESD of two lesions (2 cm diameter) in an ex vivo porcine gastric model. One resection was performed with a conventional knife and the other with the scissor knife (order of knife randomized). We recorded procedure time, successful en bloc resection, and adverse events (including full-thickness perforation and muscle injury) for each dissection. Participants completed a post-study survey. Results 10 endoscopists (8 trainees, 2 staff) considered novices in ESD participated. Compared with the conventional knife, use of the scissor knife was associated with a significantly shorter time to completion of submucosal dissection (mean 6.2 [SD 5.6] vs. 15.6 [SD 15.6] minutes; P = 0.04) and total procedure time was not significantly different (22.1 [SD 13.3] vs. 24.9 [SD 26.5] minutes; P = 0.65). Scissor knife use was also associated with a significantly lower proportion of perforation and/or muscle injury (10.0 % vs. 70.0 %; P < 0.01) and proportion of muscle injury alone (10.0 % vs. 60.0 %; P  = 0.02). Conclusions Among novices performing ESD on an ex vivo animal model, use of a scissor knife was associated with a significantly lower proportion of adverse events without prolonging procedure time. Scissor-type knives may improve ESD safety, at least among novices.

scholarly journals Risk Factors for Technical Difficulty of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Colorectal Tumors: A Case Series and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Gao ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Hui-Hong Zhai ◽  
Jianing Xu ◽  
Shanshan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dentate Line ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Submucosal Fibrosis ◽  
Lifting Sign

Abstract Background and Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection has become widely accepted as an efficient and well-established option for colorectal neoplastic lesions (CRNs). However, there are still some barriers for endoscopists that hinder the successful ESD. The current study was to evaluate risk factors for the failure of en-bloc resection in the colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from patients who underwent ESD for colorectal neoplasms (CRNs) between January 2015 and April 2017. The demographics and colonoscopic reports were analyzed. A meta-analysis was conducted for the risk factors for the failure of en-bloc or R0 resection. Results: 253 ESD cases were completed in en-bloc resection. Ulcerative colitis, previous abdominal surgeries, lesions on the Bauhin’s valve/ dentate line, non-lifting sign and submucosal fibrosis were associated with the failure of en-bloc resection (P<0.05). Meta-analysis showed that laterally spreading tumors, tumor larger than 40mm, Bauhin’s valve/dentate line, flexure, non-lifting sign, and submucosal fibrosis were the factors for the failure of en bloc or R0 resection. The rates of perforation were obviously higher in N-EBR groups compared to EBR groups. No significant results can be observed on the local recurrence based on these studies. Conclusions: Preoperative factors such as laterally spreading tumors, tumor larger than 40mm, Bauhin’s valve/dentate line, flexure and intraoperative factors such as non-lifting sign, submucosal fibrosis should be put more focus to reach better outcomes in CRNs patients.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection performed in livE pig models and in humans with large, laterally spreading gastric and colorectal adenomas – Assessment of the initial learning curves, success rate and complications

2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (21) ◽  
pp. 824-833
Author(s):  
Gábor Balogh jr. ◽  
Zsolt Dubravcsik ◽  
Attila Szepes ◽  
László Madácsy
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Specimen Size ◽  
Colorectal Adenomas ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Hungarian Experience

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a promising new endoscopic technique for en block resection of early, superficial, flat, and laterally spreading gastrointestinal neoplasms. The primary aims of this prospective study were to summarize the first Hungarian experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection, and to compare the experimental in vivo procedures in pigs with the human application of this technique in two academic centers. Methods: The ex vivo Erlangen pig model was used until initial competence was achieved. Thereafter 15 endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures were performed in up to 5 sessions in living pigs under general anesthesia. After submucosal injection with saline Fujinone ball tip, a Flush knife was used with a transparent hood for circumferential incision and submucosal dissection. The following variables were analyzed: specimen size, complete and en bloc resection rate, total duration of the procedure, and complications. Furthermore, between 2009 and 2012, 14 endoscopic submucosal dissections were carried out in humans; 1 duodenal, 3 gastric and 10 colorectal interventions were performed due to large laterally spreading intramucosal neoplasms. The specimen size, en bloc resection rate, total duration of the procedure and complications were next analyzed. Results: 87% complete resection rate, 29.4±19.5 cm2 specimen size and 136.2±26.8 min of procedure duration were achieved in the live pig models. Nontransmural damages of the muscular layer occurred in 3/15 (20%) cases which were successfully closed with hemoclips, except in one pig that died due to fatal esophageal perforation. All bleedings were easily managed with hot biopsy forceps coagulation and hemoclips without hemodynamic instability. In humans, endoscopic submucosal dissection was accomplished with an 11/14 (79%) en block resection rate, with average resected specimen size of 11.56±4.9 cm2 and with 157±55 min of operating time. Two cases of bleeding and 2 cases of perforation occurred (14%), all of which were managed endoscopically. After 1.5 year of average follow up, local recurrence occurred in one case only. In addition, due to the 3 incomplete resections and unsuccessful endoscopic submucosal dissection, surgical intervention was required in 4 cases altogether. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the first Hungarian experience with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Training in live pig models could help endoscopists to overcome the learning curve and minimize the risk of complications before starting the procedure in humans. Reduction in the resection time and low risk of complications, especially bleeding, could be achieved by the application of a flush knife. Orv. Hetil., 2012, 153, 824–833.

scholarly journals Current Challenge: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Non-ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuya Akahoshi ◽  
Masaru Kubokawa ◽  
Kazuki Inamura ◽  
Kazuaki Akahoshi ◽  
Yuki Shiratsuchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Epithelial Tumors

Opinion statement With the widespread use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy in recent years, the detection rate of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is increasing. Most SNADETs are early-stage adenocarcinoma or benign conditions, including adenoma. Therefore, endoscopic resection is desirable from the perspective of quality of life. However, endoscopic resection for SNADETs has not yet been established. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the most promising method for the treatment of SNADETs, because ESD provides a high rate of en bloc resection and a low rate of recurrence regardless of the tumor size. However, the difficulty of the procedure and a high rate of severe adverse events including perforation and bleeding have become major problems. Various preventive countermeasures for adverse events, such as use of specific devices, endoscope stabilization methods, and endoscopic closure of the post-ESD ulcer using clips, are reported to reduce the risk of the adverse events of ESD for SNADETs. This article reviews and highlights the current state of ESD for SNADETs and new challenges towards safe and effective ESD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document