scholarly journals Reply to: Prediction of Adverse Outcomes After Emergency General Surgery in Older Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 853-854
Author(s):  
Davide Zattoni ◽  
Nicole Marie Saur ◽  
Isacco Montroni
2014 ◽  
Vol 219 (3) ◽  
pp. S52-S53
Author(s):  
Syed Nabeel Zafar ◽  
Adil A. Shah ◽  
Zain G. Hashmi ◽  
Aftab Iqbal ◽  
Wendy R. Greene ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
pp. 1146-1149
Author(s):  
Kyle Okamuro ◽  
Brian Cui ◽  
Ashkan Moazzez ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Brant Putnam ◽  
...  

Cirrhosis is associated with adverse outcomes after emergency general surgery (EGS). The objective of this study was to determine the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in EGS patients with cirrhosis. We performed a two-year retrospective cohort analysis of adult patients who underwent LC for symptomatic gallstones. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraoperative complications. Of 796 patients, 59 (7.4%) were cirrhotic, with a median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 15 (IQR, 7). On unadjusted analysis, patients with cirrhosis were older, more likely to be male (both P < 0.01), diabetic ( P < 0.001), had a higher incidence of preadmission antithrombotic therapy use ( P < 0.02), and experienced a longer time to surgery (3.2 vs 1.8 days, P < 0.001). Coarsened exact matching revealed no difference in intra- or postoperative complications between groups ( P = 0.67). Operative duration was longer in patients with cirrhosis (162 vs 114 minutes, P = 0.001), who also had a nonsignificant increase in the rate of conversion to an open cholecystectomy (14% vs 4%, P = 0.07). The results of this study indicate that LC may be safely performed in EGS patients with cirrhosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-394
Author(s):  
Geeta Aggarwal ◽  
Carol J. Peden ◽  
Nial Quiney

2017 ◽  
Vol 266 (2) ◽  
pp. e35-e36
Author(s):  
Mandy Mak ◽  
Sarah Ashford-Wilson ◽  
Abdul R. Hakeem ◽  
Vivek Chitre

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. S80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Ho ◽  
Faisal Jehan ◽  
Joseph V. Sakran ◽  
Terence O'Keeffe ◽  
Narong Kulvatunyou ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 56-56
Author(s):  
Katherine C Lee ◽  
Elizabeth J. Lilley ◽  
Daniel Sturgeon ◽  
Stuart R. Lipsitz ◽  
Joaquim M Havens ◽  
...  

56 Background: Despite high post-discharge mortality among older patients with metastatic cancer who undergo emergency general surgery (EGS), little is known about the impact of EGS on the type of end-of-life care received. We sought to examine the association between EGS and established markers of high intensity or poor quality end-of-life care for cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used 2001-2013 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare to identify beneficiaries 65 years or older, diagnosed initially with stage IV cancer (lung, colorectal, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, or melanoma), who received one of the seven highest-burden EGS operations, and died within 180 days of surgery. Non-EGS controls were exact-matched by age, sex, race, cancer type, and cancer diagnosis date then assigned a pseudo-exposure date corresponding to the EGS date. Conditional logistic regression adjusting for region and Charlson score was performed among pairs discharged alive to compare location of death (facility or home/hospice), healthcare utilization (hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, emergency department (ED) visit) in the last 30 days of life, and hospice use (death in hospice, hospice enrollment less than three days from death). Results: Among 1,129 matched pairs, EGS patients had higher odds of death in facility (OR [95% CI]: 1.29 [1.05 - 1.58]) as well as hospitalization (1.83 [1.54 - 2.18]), ICU stay (2.05 [1.66 - 2.53]) or ED visit (1.76 [1.47 - 2.10]) in the last 30 days of life compared to non-EGS patients. EGS patients had higher odds of dying in hospice (1.22 [1.02 - 1.45]), but also experienced higher odds of hospice enrollment less than three days from death (1.72 [1.20 - 2.46]). Conclusions: Older patients with metastatic cancer who survive EGS experienced higher intensity end-of-life care than similar non-EGS patients. Such EGS patients may benefit from targeted interventions during the emergent hospitalization to improve the end-of-life care received.


2019 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Hamidi ◽  
Cathy Ho ◽  
Muhammad Zeeshan ◽  
Terence O'Keeffe ◽  
Ali Hamza ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document