Radial bisection of words and lines in right-brain-damaged patients with spatial neglect

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Veronelli ◽  
Lisa S. Arduino ◽  
Luisa Girelli ◽  
Giuseppe Vallar
Keyword(s):  
Cortex ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 54-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten J. Vaessen ◽  
Arnaud Saj ◽  
Karl-Olof Lovblad ◽  
Markus Gschwind ◽  
Patrik Vuilleumier

Cortex ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 348-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilena Aiello ◽  
Sheila Merola ◽  
Fabrizio Doricchi

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rindra Narison ◽  
Marie de Montalembert ◽  
Andrew Bayliss ◽  
Laurence Conty

People with left unilateral spatial neglect (USN) following a right brain lesion show difficulty in orienting their attention toward stimuli presented on the left. However, cuing the stimuli with gaze direction or a pointing arrow can help some of them to compensate for this difficulty. In order to build a tool that helps to identify these patients, we needed a short version of the paradigm classically used to test gaze and arow cuing effects in healthy adults, adapted to the capacities of patients with severe attention deficit. Here, we tested the robustness of the cuing effects measured by such a short version in 48 young adult healthy participants, 46 older healthy participants, 10 patients with left USN following a right brain lesion (USN+), and 10 patients with right brain lesions but no USN (USN–). We observed gaze and arrow cuing effects in all populations, independently of age and presence or absence of a right brain lesion. In the neglect field, the USN+ group showed event greater cuing effect than older healthy participants and the USN– group. We showed that gaze and arrow cuing effects are powerful enough to be detected in a very short test adapted to the capacities of older patients with severe attention deficits, which increases their applicability in rehabilitation settings. We further concluded that our test is a suitable basis to develop a tool that will help neuropsychologists to identify USN patients who respond to gaze and/or arrow cuing in their neglect field.


2013 ◽  
Vol 232 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Veronelli ◽  
Giuseppe Vallar ◽  
Chiara V. Marinelli ◽  
Silvia Primativo ◽  
Lisa S. Arduino
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (12) ◽  
pp. e192-e193
Author(s):  
Olga Boukrina ◽  
A.M. Barrett ◽  
Soha Saleh ◽  
Amit Chaudhari

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Wiesen ◽  
Christoph Sperber ◽  
Grigori Yourganov ◽  
Christopher Rorden ◽  
Hans-Otto Karnath

AbstractPrevious lesion behavior studies primarily used univariate lesion behavior mapping techniques to map the anatomical basis of spatial neglect after right brain damage. These studies led to inconsistent results and lively controversies. Given these inconsistencies, the idea of a widespread network that might underlie spatial orientation and neglect has been pushed forward. In such case, univariate lesion behavior mapping methods might have been inherently limited in uncover the presumed network in a single study due to limited statistical power. By using multivariate lesion-mapping based on support vector regression, we aimed to validate the network hypothesis directly in a large sample of 203 newly recruited right brain damaged patients. In a single analysis, this method identified a network of parietal, temporal, frontal, and subcortical regions, which also included white matter tracts connecting these regions. The results were compared to univariate analyses of the same patient sample using different combinations of lesion volume correction and statistical thresholding. The comparison revealed clear benefits of multivariate lesion behavior mapping in identifying brain networks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document