In vitro evaluation of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Eucheuma cottonii extract and its in vivo evaluation of the wound‐healing activity in mice

Author(s):  
Brian Sheng Xian Teo ◽  
Rui Yi Gan ◽  
Sarah Abdul Aziz ◽  
Thanchanok Sirirak ◽  
Mohd Fadli Mohd Asmani ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 1009-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mrinalini Sharma ◽  
Khageswar Sahu ◽  
Surya Prakash Singh ◽  
Beena Jain

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyotchna Gogoi ◽  
Khonamai Sewa Nakhuru ◽  
Pronobesh Chattophadhayay ◽  
Ashok Kumar Rai ◽  
Hemanta Kumar Gogoi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kriti Juneja ◽  
Rutusmita Mishra ◽  
Samrat Chauhan ◽  
Sumeet Gupta ◽  
Partha Roy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 1853-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Basu ◽  
Gunta Celma ◽  
Maria Strømme ◽  
Natalia Ferraz

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 50-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Schiff ◽  
Brandy Egan Solomon

Abstract Twelve sets of FMS (full mouth survey) radiographs were taken by California licensed radiology technicians. Ten of the sets of FMS radiographs were taken using Ultra-Speed “D” film on the left side of the patient and Insight “F” speed film on the right side of the patient. The remaining two sets of films were taken using Insight Film on both sides of the patient to act as a control. Ten faculty members of the Diagnostic Department were asked to evaluate the twelve sets of FMS radiographs and report whether they had a preference for the right side, left side, or no preference. Criteria for preference were diagnostic ability and clarity of the films. The results of the study showed a preference for the right side (65.7%), which was imaged with Insight Film, compared to the left side (34.3%), which was imaged with Ultra-Speed Film. Citation Schiff T, Solomon BE. An In Vivo Evaluation of the Diagnostic Quality Ultra-Speed Versus Insight Intraoral Dental Film. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004 November;(5)4:050-057.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara De Angelis ◽  
Margarida Fernandes Lopes Morais D’Autilio ◽  
Fabrizio Orlandi ◽  
Giampiero Pepe ◽  
Simone Garcovich ◽  
...  

Chronic ulcers are characterized by loss of substance without a normal tendency towards spontaneous healing. The Wound Bed Preparation Guideline advises that after diagnosis, the expert should correct the biological state of the ulcer micro-environment based on TIME principles (Tissue, Infection, Moisture balance, Epidermal). There are many ways to treat such ulcers, for example through use of advanced dressings, negative pressure, surgical toilets, dermal substitutes, autologous skin grafting, and free or local flaps. In vitro and in vivo pre-clinical models hold widely acknowledged potential yet complex limitations. Tissue bioengineering could be an ideal approach to foster innovative strategies in wound healing. Our observational study reports on an in vitro and in vivo evaluation of a bio-functionalized scaffold composed of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) used in 182 patients affected by chronic ulcers (diabetic and vascular), comparing the results with a control group of 182 patients treated with traditional dressings (HA alone). After 30 days the patients who had undergone the combined treatment (PRP + HA), showed 96.8% ± 1.5% re-epithelialization, as compared to 78.4% ± 4.4% in the control group (HA only). Within 80 days, they had 98.4% ± 1.3% re-epithelialization as compared to 87.8% ± 4.1% in the control group (HA only; p < 0.05). No local recurrence was observed during the follow-up period. PRP + HA treatment showed stronger regenerative potential in terms of epidermal proliferation and dermal renewal compared with HA alone.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document