Virtual Reality Versus Real‐World Space: Comparing Perceptions of Brightness, Glare, Spaciousness, and Visual Acuity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xu Jin ◽  
Jason Meneely ◽  
Nam‐Kyu Park
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Real World

scholarly journals Characterization of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity using Head-Mounted Displays in a Virtual Environment: A Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 547-551
Author(s):  
David Sproule ◽  
Rosemarie Figueroa Jacinto ◽  
Steve Rundell ◽  
Jacob Williams ◽  
Sam Perlmutter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Virtual Environment ◽  
Real World ◽  
Appropriate Use ◽  
Head Mounted Displays ◽  
Visualization Tools

Virtual reality (VR) and personal head-mounted displays (HMDs) can be a viable tool for the presentation of scientifically accurate and valid demonstrative data in the courtroom. However, the capabilities and limitations of the technology need to be fully characterized. The current pilot study evaluated visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using two commercially available HMDs (Oculus Rift and HTC Vive Pro). Preliminary findings indicated that visual acuity and contrast sensitivity experienced in VR may be less than what is experienced in real-world scenarios. The current pilot study provides a quantitative approach for characterizing the limitations of VR with respect to visual acuity and contrast sensitivity, and provides recommendations for the appropriate use of this technology when performing forensic investigations and developing visualization tools.

Technology - Virtual reality. Gamers play for real world

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
D. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Real World

Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: An 8-Year Experience at a Tertiary Eye Center

2021 ◽  
pp. 247412642097887
Author(s):  
Terry Lee ◽  
Cason B. Robbins ◽  
Akshay S. Thomas ◽  
Sharon Fekrat
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Diabetic Retinopathy ◽  
Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Real World ◽  
Early Treatment ◽  
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion ◽  
Treatment Patterns ◽  
Vein Occlusion ◽  
Anti Vegf ◽  
Treatment Naïve

Purpose: This work aims to investigate real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion in the antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) era. Methods: A retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study was conducted on eyes diagnosed with branch retinal vein occlusion at a single tertiary center between 2009 and 2017. Medical history, treatment patterns, and visual acuity outcomes were examined. Subanalysis was performed for eyes that met the eligibility criteria for the BRAVO (Ranibizumab for the Treatment of Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion) trial. Results: A total of 315 eyes were included, of which 244 were treatment naive. In all eyes, the most common first treatment was the following: intravitreal bevacizumab (38.4%), aflibercept (15.1%), ranibizumab (8.1%), sectoral scatter laser (6.2%), and triamcinolone (3.1%). At 1 year, treatment-naive eyes had received an average of 2.43 anti-VEGF injections. During follow-up, treatment-naive eyes gained an average of 0.21 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study lines. Forty eyes that met BRAVO trial criteria received an average of 5.05 anti-VEGF injections in the first year and gained an average of 1.83 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study lines. Conclusions: This real-world cohort received fewer anti-VEGF injections at year 1 and experienced less improvement in visual acuity during the course of treatment than clinical trial participants. Trial-eligible patients received more injections and had greater visual gains than those who would not have been eligible for the trial.

scholarly journals Translating Virtual Reality Cue Exposure Therapy for Binge Eating into a Real-World Setting: An Uncontrolled Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1511
Author(s):  
Katherine Nameth ◽  
Theresa Brown ◽  
Kim Bullock ◽  
Sarah Adler ◽  
Giuseppe Riva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Binge Eating ◽  
Real World ◽  
Exposure Therapy ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Cue Exposure ◽  
Treatment Gains ◽  
Intent To Treat

Binge-eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN) have adverse psychological and medical consequences. Innovative interventions, like the integration of virtual reality (VR) with cue-exposure therapy (VR-CET), enhance outcomes for refractory patients compared to cognitive behavior therapy (CBT). Little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of translating VR-CET into real-world settings. To investigate this question, adults previously treated for BED or BN with at least one objective or subjective binge episode/week were recruited from an outpatient university eating disorder clinic to receive up to eight weekly one-hour VR-CET sessions. Eleven of 16 (68.8%) eligible patients were enrolled; nine (82%) completed treatment; and 82% (9/11) provided follow-up data 7.1 (SD = 2.12) months post-treatment. Overall, participant and therapist acceptability of VR-CET was high. Intent-to-treat objective binge episodes (OBEs) decreased significantly from 3.3 to 0.9/week (p < 0.001). Post-treatment OBE 7-day abstinence rate for completers was 56%, with 22% abstinent for 28 days at follow-up. Among participants purging at baseline, episodes decreased from a mean of one to zero/week, with 100% abstinence maintained at follow-up. The adoption of VR-CET into real-world clinic settings appears feasible and acceptable, with a preliminary signal of effectiveness. Findings, including some loss of treatment gains during follow-up may inform future treatment development.

scholarly journals Eyes that Do Not Meet the Eligibility Criteria of Clinical Trials on Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Proportion of the Real-World Patient Population and Reasons for Exclusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jae Hui Kim ◽  
Jong Woo Kim ◽  
Chul Gu Kim
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Real World ◽  
Age Related Macular Degeneration ◽  
Subretinal Hemorrhage ◽  
Neovascular Amd ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Type 3 Neovascularization ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Type 3

Background. To evaluate the proportion of eyes that do not meet the eligibility criteria of clinical trials on neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and the reasons for exclusion. Methods. This retrospective, observational study included 512 eyes of 463 patients diagnosed with treatment-naïve neovascular AMD. The proportion of eyes that did not meet the eligibility criteria of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Trap-Eye: Investigation of Efficacy and Safety in Wet AMD (VIEW) studies were evaluated. The two most common reasons for exclusion were also evaluated in each subtype of neovascular AMD (typical neovascular AMD, polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), and type 3 neovascularization). Results. Among the 512 eyes, 229 (44.7%) did not meet the eligibility criteria. In all the included eyes, the most common reasons for exclusion were good or poor visual acuity (169 eyes, 33.0%), followed by the presence of subretinal hemorrhage (47 eyes, 9.5%). Moreover, good or poor visual acuity was the most common reason for exclusion in all three subtypes of neovascular AMD. The second most common reason was a fovea-involving scar or fibrosis in typical neovascular AMD, subretinal hemorrhage in PCV, and other vascular diseases affecting the retina in type 3 neovascularization. Conclusions. Among the included cases, 44.7% did not meet the eligibility criteria for VIEW study, suggesting that the conclusion derived from clinical trials may not directly reflect the real-world outcomes. Additionally, the reasons for ineligibility differed among the different subtypes of neovascular AMD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document