Accuracy of Reduction Depths of Tooth Preparation for Porcelain Laminate Veneers Assisted By Different Tooth Preparation Guides: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Gao ◽  
Jinxiu He ◽  
Lin Fan ◽  
Jiayi Lu ◽  
Chenyang Xie ◽  
...  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Gao ◽  
L Jia ◽  
X Tan ◽  
H Yu

SUMMARY Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the preservation of enamel after tooth preparation for porcelain laminate veneers (PLVs) at different preparation depths based on a fully digital workflow. Methods and Materials: Sixty extracted human maxillary anterior teeth, including 20 maxillary central incisors (MCIs), 20 maxillary lateral incisors (MLIs), and 20 maxillary canines (MCs) underwent microcomputed tomography (CT) scanning, and were reconstructed as three-dimensional (3D) enamel and dentin models. Subsequently, the three-dimensional (3D) enamel models were imported into Materialise, where each enamel model underwent seven types of virtual preparation for PLVs at preparation depths at 0.1-mm increments from 0.1-0.3-0.5 mm (D1) to 0.7-0.9-1.1 mm (D7). The enamel surface was depicted by merging the virtual preparation and, respective, dentin models. The enamel area and prepared surface were measured to calculate the percentage of enamel (R%). The data were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α=0.05). Results: The group-wise mean (standard deviation) R values for the MCIs were as follows: D1-D3: 100.00 (0) each, and D4-D7: 74.70 (2.45), 51.40 (5.12), 24.40 (3.06), and 0.00 (0), respectively. The group-wise mean R values for the MLIs were 100.00 (0), 73.70 (3.40), 53.50 (3.44), 25.20 (3.79), and 0.90 (0.99) for the D1-D5 groups, respectively; and 0.00 (0) each for the D6-D7 groups. The group-wise mean (standard deviations) R values for the MCs were as follows: D1-D3: 100.00 (0) each, and D4-D7: 99.00 (1.34), 77.10 (3.28), 74.20 (3.61), and 52.20 (4.09), respectively. The one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the seven groups in the MCIs, MLIs, and MCs (p<0.05). Conclusions: Our results recommended preparation depths of up to 0.3-0.5-0.7 mm (MCIs), 0.1-0.3-0.5 mm (MLIs), and 0.4-0.6-0.8 mm (MCs) to facilitate complete intraenamel preparation. Moreover, 50% enamel was preserved at preparation depths of 0.5-0.7-0.9 mm (MCIs), 0.3-0.5-0.7 mm (MLIs), and 0.7-0.9-1.1 mm (MCs).


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Dr. S. Seyedasharafali ◽  
Dr. Suma Karthigeyan ◽  
J. Sankar ◽  
R. Madhan ◽  
Dr. R. Krishnaraj ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 429-432
Author(s):  
Marina Rodrigues Santi ◽  
Mayara dos Santos Noronha ◽  
Fernanda Rodrigues Borges Amaral Guarato ◽  
Milena Maria Pierre dos Santos Caldeira

A indicação de laminados cerâmicos deve ser precedida de um diagnóstico criterioso, onde deve-se estar atento aos passos e aspectos clínicos envolvidos nesse tipo de reabilitação. Este relato de caso tem como objetivo descrever a sequência clínica de uma reabilitação estética dos dentes 11 e 21 empregando laminados cerâmicos de dissilicato de lítio com desgaste dental seletivo minimamente invasivo associado ao clareamento prévio, proporcionando a reprodução das características naturais dos dentes.Descritores: Clareamento Dental; Cerâmica; Estética Dentária.ReferênciasD'Arcangelo C, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D'Amario M. Clinical evaluation on porcelain laminate veneers bonded with light-cured composite: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(4):1071-79.Benetti AR, Miranda CB, Amore R, Pagani C. Facetas indiretas em porcelana-alternativa estética. J Bras Dent Estét. 2003;2(7):186-94.Teixeira HM, Nascimento ABL, Emerrenciano M. Reabilitação da Estética com Facetas Indiretas de Porcelana. J Bras Dent Estét. 2003;2(7):219-23.Jarad FD, Griffiths CE, Jaffri M, Adeyemi AA, Youngson CC. The effect of bleaching, varying the shade or thickness of composite veneers on final colour: an in vitro study. J Dent. 2008;36(7):554-59.Lowe E. Achieving total smile enhancement through tooth whitening and placement of a single anterior veneer restoration. Dent Today. 2001;20(12):44-8Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation-a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25(1):9-17. Aquino APT, Cardoso PC, Rodrigues MB, Takano AE, Porfírio W. Facetas de porcelana: solução estética e funcional. Clin int j braz dent. 2009;5(2):142-52.Higashi C, Reggiani RD, Kina S, Scopin O, Hirata R. Cerâmicas em Dentes Anteriores Parte I. Indicações Clínicas dos sistemas cerâmicos.  Clin int j braz dent. 2006;2(1):22-31.Kina S, Brugrera A. Inivisível: restaurações estéticas cerâmicas. Maringá: Dental Press; 2007.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document