Faculty feedback that begins with resident self-assessment: motivation is the key to success

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Moroz ◽  
Margaret Horlick ◽  
Neil Mandalaywala ◽  
David T Stern
2018 ◽  
Vol 215 (2) ◽  
pp. 288-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Tanoue ◽  
Lev N. Korovin ◽  
Melissa Carton ◽  
Carlos A. Galvani ◽  
Iman Ghaderi

Author(s):  
Milan Stoilov ◽  
Lea Trebess ◽  
Markus Klemmer ◽  
Helmut Stark ◽  
Norbert Enkling ◽  
...  

Background: Regarding the new dental licensing regulations in Germany (AOZ), this study evaluated the effectiveness of two different digital tooth preparation validation systems in comparison to traditional faculty feedback. Methods: Participants were randomly divided into groups: Faculty Feedback (FF: n = 33), PrepCheck® (PC: n = 32) and Dental Teacher™ (n = 32). Students had the task to prepare tooth 16 for a retentive full-cast crown. Preparations could be repeated as often as desired. Feedback was provided either by faculty staff or by digital validation systems only. Exams were conducted and graded by two independent and experienced examiners. A survey was performed to evaluate the assessment concepts. Results: No statistical difference in examination performance between groups could be observed. Nevertheless, the survey showed participants preferred consulting the faculty staff rather than the digital validation systems. Students preferred practising with DT rather than with PC. Conclusions: Although both classical and digital methods showed comparable results regarding the preparation examination performance, direct feedback by the faculty staff is still appreciated by the students. A combination of both methods is mandatory since demonstration and advice by the teacher is needed. However, digital tooth preparation validation systems are predestined for free practice sessions, providing self-assessment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Pat McCarthy

This article details the process of self-reflection applied to the use of traditional performance indicator questionnaires. The study followed eight speech-language pathology graduate students enrolled in clinical practicum in the university, school, and healthcare settings over a period of two semesters. Results indicated when reflection was focused on students' own clinical skills, modifications to practice were implemented. Results further concluded self-assessment using performance indicators paired with written reflections can be a viable form of instruction in clinical education.


Author(s):  
Ying-Chiao Tsao

Promoting cultural competence in serving diverse clients has become critically important across disciplines. Yet, progress has been limited in raising awareness and sensitivity. Tervalon and Murray-Garcia (1998) believed that cultural competence can only be truly achieved through critical self-assessment, recognition of limits, and ongoing acquisition of knowledge (known as “cultural humility”). Teaching cultural humility, and the value associated with it remains a challenging task for many educators. Challenges inherent in such instruction stem from lack of resources/known strategies as well as learner and instructor readiness. Kirk (2007) further indicates that providing feedback on one's integrity could be threatening. In current study, both traditional classroom-based teaching pedagogy and hands-on community engagement were reviewed. To bridge a gap between academic teaching/learning and real world situations, the author proposed service learning as a means to teach cultural humility and empower students with confidence in serving clients from culturally/linguistically diverse backgrounds. To provide a class of 51 students with multicultural and multilingual community service experience, the author partnered with the Tzu-Chi Foundation (an international nonprofit organization). In this article, the results, strengths, and limitations of this service learning project are discussed.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 5-29
Author(s):  
Joseph Montano
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 79A-79A
Author(s):  
S BUTLERMANUEL ◽  
K SUMMERVILLE ◽  
A FORD ◽  
A RILEY ◽  
F CHAN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document