Using dive behavior and active acoustics to assess prey use and partitioning by fin and humpback whales near Kodiak Island, Alaska

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana H. Witteveen ◽  
Alex De Robertis ◽  
Lei Guo ◽  
Kate M. Wynne
1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 210-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice M. Waite ◽  
Marilyn E. Dahlheim ◽  
Roderick C. Hobbs ◽  
Sally A. Mizroch ◽  
Olga Von Ziegesar-Matkin ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 1352-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Briana H Witteveen ◽  
Janice M Straley ◽  
Olga von Ziegesar ◽  
D Steel ◽  
C Scott Baker

Despite extensive research on humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski, 1781)) in parts of the North Pacific, little research has focused on the whales feeding in coastal waters west of Kodiak Island in the Gulf of Alaska. To extend research westward in the North Pacific, small-boat surveys were conducted near the Shumagin Islands during the summers of 1999–2002. Photographs of the natural markings of humpback whales were collected, representing 413 sightings of 171 individual whales. Small samples of skin tissue were collected from 20 individuals, including two mother–calf pairs, for sex identification and comparison of mtDNA haplogroups with previously published results from surveys in other regions of the North Pacific. Individual identification photographs were used in mark–recapture analysis to estimate abundance for the Shumagin Island region. The best estimate was given by a modified Jolly–Seber method: N = 410 (95% CI: 241–683) for 2002. Comparison of photographs with archived photographs from throughout the North Pacific revealed four migratory destinations for 13 of the Shumagin Islands whales: Hawai'i, Japan, offshore Mexico, and coastal Mexico. The frequencies of mtDNA haplogroups differed significantly from those in three other sampled feeding grounds: California, southeastern Alaska, and Prince William Sound. The haplogroup frequencies and migratory destinations of individuals suggested an affinity with the Hawaiian wintering ground but data are insufficient to associate whales off the Shumagin Islands with any surveyed breeding ground.


Author(s):  
EE Henderson ◽  
M Deakos ◽  
J Aschettino ◽  
D Englehaupt ◽  
G Alongi

2006 ◽  
Vol 119 (5) ◽  
pp. 3404-3404
Author(s):  
Alison K. Stimpert ◽  
Whitlow W. L. Au ◽  
David N. Wiley ◽  
Kenneth A. Shorter ◽  
Kira L. Barton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 642 ◽  
pp. 227-240
Author(s):  
L Lodi ◽  
R Tardin ◽  
G Maricato

Most studies of cetacean habitat use do not consider the influence of anthropogenic activities. We investigated the influence of environmental and anthropogenic variables on habitat use by humpback Megaptera novaeangliae and Bryde’s whales Balaenoptera brydei off the coast of the Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro. Although there are 2 marine protected areas (MPAs) in this area, few data are available on cetacean habitat use or on the overlap of different cetacean species within these MPAs. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the MPAs and propose a buffer zone to better protect the biodiversity of the study area. We conducted systematic surveys and developed spatial eigenvector generalized linear models to characterize habitat use by the species in the study area. Habitat use by humpback whales was influenced only by depth, whereas for Bryde’s whales there was the additional influence of anthropogenic variables. For Bryde’s whales, which use the area for feeding, sea surface temperature and the distance to anchorages had a major influence on habitat use. We also showed that neither of the MPAs in the study area adequately protects the hotspots of either whale species. Most of the humpback whale grid cells with high sighting predictions were located within 2 km of the MPAs, while areas of high sighting prediction of Bryde’s whales were located up to 5 km from the MPAs, closer to beaches. Our findings provide important insights for the delimitation of protected areas and zoning of the MPAs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document