Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Sacroiliac Joint Pain

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Angelo Patil ◽  
DeeAne Otto ◽  
Soubrata Raikar
2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marin Guentchev ◽  
Christian Preuss ◽  
Rainer Rink ◽  
Levente Peter ◽  
Ernst-Ludwig Wocker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
Jessica Jameson

Sacroiliac joint pain is a very common cause of low back pain. Treatments such as physical therapy, medications, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and nerve blocks or injections can often improve symptoms. However, when these techniques are unsuccessful, consideration should be given to peripheral nerve stimulation as a long-term solution for chronic sacroiliac joint pain. Case reports over the previous decade have indicated that peripheral nerve stimulation can be useful in treating sacroiliac joint pain. This chapter provides an overview of this technique. The topics include the patient selection process (including the importance of obtaining a psychological evaluation), contraindications, and instruments used during the procedure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juichi Tonosu ◽  
Hiroyuki Oka ◽  
Kenichi Watanabe ◽  
Hiroaki Abe ◽  
Akiro Higashikawa ◽  
...  

AbstractTo evaluate the characteristics of the spinopelvic parameters on radiography in patients with sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP). Two hundred fifty patients were included and divided into the SIJP group (those diagnosed with SIJP based on physical findings and response to analgesic periarticular injections; n = 53) and the non-SIJP group (those with low back pain [LBP] because of other reasons; n = 197). We compared their demographic characteristics and spinopelvic parameters using radiography. All differences found in the patients’ demographic characteristics and spinopelvic parameters were analyzed. More female participants experienced SIJP than male participants (P = 0.0179). Univariate analyses revealed significant differences in pelvic incidence (PI) (P = 0.0122), sacral slope (SS) (P = 0.0034), and lumbar lordosis (LL) (P = 0.0078) between the groups. The detection powers for PI, SS, and LL were 0.71, 0.84, and 0.66, respectively. Logistic regression analyses, after adjustment for age and sex, revealed significant differences in PI (P = 0.0308) and SS (P = 0.0153) between the groups, with odds ratios of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively. More female participants experienced SIJP than male participants. Higher PI and SS values were related to SIJP among LBP patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 153 (7) ◽  
pp. 1461-1468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haktan Karaman ◽  
Gönül Ölmez Kavak ◽  
Adnan Tüfek ◽  
Feyzi Çelik ◽  
Zeynep Baysal Yıldırım ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayur Sharma ◽  
Ammar Shaikhouni ◽  
Emam Saleh ◽  
Andrew Shaw ◽  
Milind Deogaonkar

Spine ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1069-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Octavio Calvillo ◽  
Stephen I. Esses ◽  
Craig Ponder ◽  
Carl DʼAgostino ◽  
Eduardo Tanhui

Breathe ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. e59-e67
Author(s):  
Athanasia Proklou ◽  
Maria Bolaki ◽  
Evangelia E. Vassalou ◽  
Eleni Bibaki ◽  
Eirini Vasarmidi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document