The contribution of species-genetic diversity correlations to the understanding of community assembly rules

Oikos ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 759-771 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lamy ◽  
Fabien Laroche ◽  
Patrice David ◽  
François Massol ◽  
Philippe Jarne
2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
KL Vergin ◽  
N Jhirad ◽  
J Dodge ◽  
CA Carlson ◽  
SJ Giovannoni

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Luiselli ◽  
Massimiliano Di Vittorio ◽  
Anders G. J. Rhodin ◽  
John B. Iverson

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (21) ◽  
pp. 4041-4052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zechen Peng ◽  
Shurong Zhou

Oecologia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofie Spatharis ◽  
David Mouillot ◽  
Thang Do Chi ◽  
Daniel B. Danielidis ◽  
George Tsirtsis

Ecosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Corline ◽  
Ryan A. Peek ◽  
Jacob Montgomery ◽  
Jacob V. E. Katz ◽  
Carson A. Jeffres

Oikos ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Weiher ◽  
G. D. Paul Clarke ◽  
Paul A. Keddy

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 753-761
Author(s):  
TANG Li-Li ◽  
ZHANG Mei ◽  
ZHAO Xiang-Lin ◽  
KANG Mu-Yi ◽  
LIU Hong-Yan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas M. Leveau

Abstract Background The analysis of bird community assembly rules is fundamental to understand which mechanisms determine the composition of bird species in urban areas. However, the long-term variation of community assembly rules has not been analyzed yet. The objectives of this study are (1) to analyze the variation of community assembly rules along rural-urban gradients of three cities in central Argentina and (2) to compare the patterns of community assembly between two periods separated by 6 years. Bird surveys were performed along transects in urban, suburban, and rural habitats during 2011 and 2017. Departures from null models that took into account differences in species richness (standardized effect size, SES) were calculated for functional and phylogenetic diversities. Results A total of 57 species were recorded. Bird species richness was higher in suburban than in urban and rural habitats. SES of functional diversity increased over the years and was significantly lower in urban habitats than in rural habitats, showing a pattern of functional clustering in the most urbanized areas and functional randomness in rural ones. Phylogenetic diversity was higher in both suburban and urban habitats than rural ones, and the phylogenetic clustering in rural bird assemblages changed to randomness in suburban and urban habitats. Conclusions Bird communities in urban habitats were phylogenetically random and functionally clustered, evidencing environmental filtering by urbanization. In contrast, bird communities in rural areas tended to be phylogenetically clustered, evidencing that certain clades are adapted to rural areas. The processes structuring bird communities along rural-urban gradients were consistent between the 2 years compared.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document