Acoustic communication in the pine engraver bark beetle: do signals vary between behavioural contexts?

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andras Dobai ◽  
Senthurran Sivalinghem ◽  
Raul N.C. Guedes ◽  
Jayne E. Yack
2000 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 649-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dezene P.W. Huber ◽  
John H. Borden ◽  
Nicole L. Jeans-Williams ◽  
Regine Gries

AbstractThe angiosperm bark volatile, conophthorin, was tested at release rates of 3.0 and 0.3 mg/24 h against the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, the spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby), the pine engraver, Ips pint (Say), and the western balsam bark beetle, Dryocoetes confusus Swaine (all Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The responses of D. pseudotsugae, I. pini, and (in one of two experiments) female D. confusus to attractant-baited traps were disrupted by conophthorin in a dose-dependent manner. Dendroctonus rufipennis was not disrupted by conophthorin. Our results extend the repellent bioactivity of conophthorin to Ips DeGeer spp. and confirm earlier experiments with D. pseudotsugae. Conophthorin may have some utility in protecting susceptible timber from bark beetle attack.


2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 252-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol L. Bedoya ◽  
Eckehard G. Brockerhoff ◽  
Michael Hayes ◽  
Stephen M. Pawson ◽  
Adriana Najar‐Rodriguez ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 602-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel R. Miller ◽  
John H. Borden

We conducted seven experiments in stands of mature lodgepole pine in southern British Columbia to elucidate the role of host volatiles in the semiochemical ecology of the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), with particular reference to the behavioral responses of predators and competing species of bark beetles. Our results demonstrated that the attraction of Ips pini and the bark beetle predators Lasconotus complex LeConte (Colydiidae), Thanasimus undatulus (Say) (Cleridae) and a Corticeus sp. (Tenebrionidae) were increased by 3-carene. In contrast, attraction of the bark beetle Pityogenes knechteli Swaine (Scolytidae) to ipsdienol was interrupted by 3-carene and α-pinene. Attraction of L. complex to ipsdienol was increased by γ-terpinene, a compound attractive to the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Scolytidae). Terpinolene interrupted the attraction of I. pini to ipsdienol.


Insects ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 496
Author(s):  
Ivan Lukic ◽  
Carol L. Bedoya ◽  
Evan M. Hofstetter ◽  
Richard W. Hofstetter

Bark beetles are among the most influential biotic agents in conifer forests, and forest management often focuses on bark beetle chemical communication for tree protection. Although acoustic communication occurs in many bark beetle species, we have yet to utilize acoustic communication for bark beetle control. Here, we describe the stridulatory organs and ‘stress’ chirps of the pinyon engraver, Ips confusus, a significant pest and mortality agent of pinyon pine in western North America. Only females possessed stridulatory organs and their stress chirps varied significantly in duration, pulses per chirp, and dominant frequency. We tested an array of acoustic-vibrational treatments into logs but were unable to disrupt male entry into logs or alter female–male interactions, female tunneling, and female oviposition. We found acoustic–vibrational treatments had little effect on I. confusus behavior and suggest further studies if acoustic methods are to be utilized for bark beetle control.


Author(s):  
K. V. Davydenko ◽  
D. O. Baturkin

The pine engraver beetle Ips acuminatus Gyll. is a potential vector of the Sphaeropsis tip blight pathogen according to Leach’s postulates. The specimens of I. acuminatus were associated with numerous fungi species, namely Sphaeropsis sapinea (Fr.) Dyko & B. Sutton and ophiostomatoid species. The association between opportunistic pathogen S. sapinea and I. acuminatus has been confirmed for 62.9 % of all branches (44 % of needle samples and 82 % of wood samples). The presence of S. sapinea in the galleries and on the surface of the beetle indicates that I. acuminatus may transport the pathogen and later introduce it into healthy trees. The bark beetle can transfer pathogenic fungus during maturation feeding on the shoots of healthy pine crowns and into the branches during making galleries.


1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Haack ◽  
Robert K. Lawrence

Established populations of an exotic bark beetle, the larger pine shoot beetle [Tomicus piniperda (L.)], were first reported in Ohio in July 1992. Subsequent surveys through July 1994 have found T. piniperda in six states in the United States and in one Canadian Province in the Great Lakes region. One-meter-long trunk sections were cut from Scotch pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) trees felled from February through July 1993 in a forested site in southern Michigan, laid horizontally, allowed to undergo natural attack by bark beetles and associates, and later dissected. In southern Michigan in 1993, T. piniperda initiated spring flight in late March; the pine engraver [Ips pini (Say)], a native pine bark beetle, initiated spring flight about one month later in late April. Tomicus piniperda attacks (galleries) were found in logs cut during February through May. Attack densities of T. piniperda were highest in February-cut logs, and declined with subsequent felling dates. The highest T. piniperda attack density recorded for an entire log section was 263 attacks/m2 of bark area on one of the February-cut logs. Ips pini attack densities tended to increase with later felling dates. When I. pini attacked logs that had already been colonized by T. piniperda, I. pini galleries were mostly found on the upper log surface. When I. pini attacked logs with few or no T. piniperda, I. pini galleries were found on all log surfaces. By initiating spring flight several weeks before I. pini, T. piniperda is able to colonize much of the susceptible pine material and thereby may lower I. pini populations.


2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 173-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Martin ◽  
Jörg Bohlmann ◽  
Jonathan Gershenzon ◽  
Wittko Francke ◽  
Steven J. Seybold

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document