Comparative analysis of genetic structures and aggressiveness of Fusarium pseudograminearum populations from two surveys undertaken in 2008 and 2015 at two sites in the wheat belt of Western Australia

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1337-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Khudhair ◽  
L. F. Thatcher ◽  
D. M. Gardiner ◽  
K. Kazan ◽  
M. M. Roper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Western Australia ◽  
Fusarium Pseudograminearum ◽  
Genetic Structures

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Rural Community Pharmacy Practice in Western Australia in 2002 and 2006

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Yosi Wibowo ◽  
Constantine G Berbatis ◽  
Andrew Joyce ◽  
V Bruce Sunderland
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Community Pharmacy ◽  
Rural Community ◽  
Western Australia ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Community Pharmacy Practice

Comparative analysis of spatial genetic structures in sympatric populations of two riparian plants, Saxifraga acerifolia and Saxifraga fortunei

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kana Magota ◽  
Shota Sakaguchi ◽  
Shun K. Hirota ◽  
Yoshihiro Tsunamoto ◽  
Yoshihisa Suyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Sympatric Populations ◽  
Riparian Plants ◽  
Genetic Structures

scholarly journals Blinded by the White: A Comparative Analysis of Jury Challenges on Racial Grounds

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 25-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thalia Anthony ◽  
Craig Longman
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Indigenous People ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Western Australia ◽  
The United States ◽  
Jury Selection ◽  
Criminal Trials ◽  
White Racism ◽  
White Defendants

Indigenous peoples in Australia, the United States and Canada are significantly overrepresented as defendants in criminal trials and yet vastly underrepresented on juries in criminal trials. This means that all-white juries mostly determine the guilt of Indigenous defendants or white defendants responsible for harming Indigenous victims. In this article, we explore cases in which Indigenous defendants have perceived that an all-white jury’s prejudice against Indigenous people would prevent them receiving a fair trial. It focuses on Indigenous defendants (often facing charges in relation to protesting against white racism) challenging the array of all-white juries. Across these cases, Australian courts rely on formal notions of fairness in jury selection to dismiss the Indigenous defendant’s perception of bias and foreclose an inquiry into the potential prejudices of white jurors. We compare the Australian judicial ‘colour-blindness’ towards all-white juries with that of the United States and Canada. We argue that the tendency for courts in the United States and Canada to question jurors on their biases provides useful lessons for Australian judiciaries, including in relation to the impending trials of Indigenous defendants in Kalgoorlie, Western Australia, accused of committing crimes in response to white racist violence. Nonetheless, across all jurisdictions where there is a challenge to the array based on racial composition, courts consistently uphold all-white juries. We suggest that the judicial view of the racial neutrality of white jury selection misapprehends the substantive biases in jury selection and the injustice perceived by defendants in having a white jury adjudicate an alleged crime that is committed in circumstances involving protest against white prejudice.

Comparative Analysis between Biomass and Topographic Features in an Arid Land, Western Australia

2003 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yukuo Abe ◽  
Masahiko Taniguchi ◽  
Hideki Suganuma ◽  
Masahiro Saito ◽  
Toshinori Kojima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Western Australia ◽  
Arid Land ◽  
Topographic Features

scholarly journals Comparative analysis indicates historical persistence and contrasting contemporary structure in sympatric woody perennials of semi-arid south-west Western Australia

2017 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 771-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Millar ◽  
Margaret Byrne ◽  
David J. Coates ◽  
J. Dale Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Western Australia ◽  
Woody Perennials ◽  
South West ◽  
Semi Arid

scholarly journals Comparative and Critical Analysis of Key Eligibility Criteria for Voluntary Assisted Dying under Five Legal Frameworks

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben P White ◽  
Eliana Close ◽  
Lindy Willmott ◽  
Katrine Del Villar ◽  
Jocelyn Downie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Western Australia ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Medical Condition ◽  
Assisted Dying ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Crucial Question ◽  
Need To Evaluate ◽  
Legal Frameworks ◽  
Key Aspects

Eligibility criteria determine a crucial question for all voluntary assisted dying frameworks: who can access assistance to die? This article undertakes a critical and comparative analysis of these criteria across five legal frameworks: existing laws in Victoria, Western Australia, Oregon and Canada, along with a model Bill for reform. Key aspects of these criteria analysed are capacity requirements; the nature of the medical condition that will qualify; and any required suffering. There are many similarities between the five models but there are also important differences which can have a significant impact on who can access voluntary assisted dying and when. Further, seemingly straightforward criteria can become complex in practice. The article concludes with the implications of this analysis for designing voluntary assisted dying regulation. Those implications include challenges of designing certain yet fair legislation and the need to evaluate voluntary assisted dying frameworks holistically to properly understand their operation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document