scholarly journals P10‐4: Clinical study about the safety of orexin receptor antagonist suvorexant for severe sleep apnea syndrome

Respirology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (S3) ◽  
pp. 398-398
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 681-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Mutoh ◽  
Yasuaki Okuda ◽  
Sho Mokuda ◽  
Naoya Sawada ◽  
Kenichiro Matoba ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
pp. 984-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Quintana-Gallego ◽  
Carmen Carmona-Bernal ◽  
Francisco Capote ◽  
Ángeles Sánchez-Armengol ◽  
Georgina Botebol-Benhamou ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Inoue ◽  
Kazuyoshi Nanba ◽  
Kazushige Kojima ◽  
Hideaki Mitani ◽  
And Heii Arai

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micheli Santos ◽  
Tatiana Nakano ◽  
Felipe Mendes ◽  
Bruno Duarte ◽  
Silvio Marone

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (18) ◽  
pp. 4065
Author(s):  
Nithi Tokavanich ◽  
Pattranee Leelapatana ◽  
Somchai Prechawat ◽  
Voravut Rungpradubvong ◽  
Wimwipa Mongkonsritrakoon ◽  
...  

Background: Sleep apnea is one of the most common conditions around the world. This disorder can significantly impact cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) is a treatment modality that can potentially decrease respiratory events. There is currently a lack of evidence to confirm the benefits of AOP. We aimed to assess the impact of AOP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), central sleep apnea (CSA), and mixed type. Methods: A literature search for studies that reported the impact on apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) by cardiac implantable electronic devices with different pacing modes was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database from inception through July 2020. Pooled standard mean difference with 95%CI was calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Fifteen studies, including thirteen randomized studies and two observational studies containing 440 patients, were identified. The standard mean difference in apnea–hypopnea index of atrial overdrive pacing demonstrated less duration of apnea/hypopnea in patients with atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) (SMD −0.29, 95%CI: −0.48, −0.10, I2 = 57%). Additional analysis was performed to assess the effect of atrial overdrive pacing in patients with or without severe sleep apnea syndrome (mean AHI < 30 defined as non-severe). There was no statistically significant difference in standardized mean in AHI in both subgroups between AOP and control groups (SMD −0.25, severe sleep apnea syndrome SMD −0.03, I2 = 0.00%). Conclusions: AOP was associated with a statistically significant reduction in AHI, but the magnitude of reduction was small. AOP may potentially be used as an adjunctive treatment with other modalities in treating patients with sleep apnea.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document