Effect of primary tumor resection on overall survival in patients with stage IV breast cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 908-915
Author(s):  
Sung Mook Lim ◽  
Jee Ye Kim ◽  
Hyung Seok Park ◽  
Seho Park ◽  
Gun Min Kim ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malke Asaad ◽  
Jennifer A. Yonkus ◽  
Tanya L. Hoskin ◽  
Tina J. Hieken ◽  
James W. Jakub ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS588-TPS588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadahiko Shien ◽  
Tomonori Mizutani ◽  
Kiyo Tanaka ◽  
Takayuki Kinoshita ◽  
Fumikata Hara ◽  
...  

TPS588 Background: The possibility of improving the survival of stage IV breast cancer patients by primary tumor resection (PTR) has been reported by several retrospective studies; however, these studies essentially suffer from biases such as arbitrary patient selection, diverse timing of surgery or various regimens of systemic therapy. Five prospective randomized trials including our trial have evaluated the efficacy of PTR for them. Two have reported final results, but those results were inconsistent. Therefore, this subject still remains a hotly debated topic at major breast conferences. Methods: Our trial is being conducted to confirm the superiority of PTR plus systemic therapy over systemic therapy alone in stage IV pts who are sensitive to primary systemic therapy (PST) in this study. The inclusion criteria are untreated pts with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer with one or more measurable distant metastatic lesions diagnosed by radiological examination.All pts receive PST according to the ER and HER2 status of the primary breast cancer after the first registration. After three months, the pts who are sensitive to PST are randomized to the PTR plus systemic therapy arm or the systemic therapy alone arm. After randomization and surgery in the former arm, or after randomization in the latter arm, the same systemic therapies are continued until progression of diseases and next appropriate regimens are started after that. The primary endpoint is the overall survival, and the secondary endpoints are proportion of pts without tumor progression at the metastatic sites, yearly local recurrence-free survival, proportion of local ulcer/local bleeding, yearly primary tumor resection-free survival, adverse events (AEs) of chemotherapy, operative morbidity, and serious AEs. Sample size for randomized pts was determined to attain at least 80% of power to detect a 6 months difference with one-sided alpha of 0.05.The pts accrual was started in May 2011. Enrollment of 410 pts for randomization is planned over a 7-year accrual period. 307 pts have been randomized until Jan 2017. This trial was registered at UMIN-CTR[umin.ac.jp/ctr/] as UMIN000005586. Clinical trial information: UMIN000005586.


2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 538-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Gnerlich ◽  
Jeffrey M. Dueker ◽  
Donna B. Jeffe ◽  
Anjali D. Deshpande ◽  
Samantha Thompson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 1504-1512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weikai Xiao ◽  
Yutian Zou ◽  
Shaoquan Zheng ◽  
Xiaoqian Hu ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 90-90
Author(s):  
J. A. Tjoe ◽  
L. A. Robinson ◽  
J. Stephenson ◽  
J. J. Marx

90 Background: Publications from academic centers and national cancer databases suggest a survival advantage for women who undergo primary tumor extirpation in the setting of known distant disease. We asked if similar findings exist in a community hospital setting. Methods: 15,887 patients entered in a longitudinally maintained breast cancer database (encompassing a system network of 13 community hospitals) during 1985-2009 were analyzed for those diagnosed with stage IV disease upon initial presentation. The cohort was divided into those who underwent primary tumor resection, and those who did not. The two subgroups were compared for patient demographics, tumor characteristics, sites of distant metastases, systemic treatment, and overall survival (OS). Results: 643 (4.05%) presented with an intact primary breast malignancy and synchronous distant metastasis. Median age at diagnosis: 66 years (range 22-96). Median OS: 15 months (range 0-249). 264 (41.1%) patients underwent primary tumor resection as part of first course treatment. On Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis, patients who underwent surgical extirpation of the primary tumor demonstrated improved median OS compared to those who did not (26 vs 10 months; p<0.0001, HR 0.52). Age at diagnosis <50 (p=0.0003, HR 0.65) and oligometastasis to bone (p=0.0002, HR 0.72) were statistically significant predictors of improved OS. Race, primary tumor size, and ER status alone did not influence OS. Those ER+ patients who underwent primary tumor excision in addition to chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy fared significantly better than those treated with systemic therapy alone (32 vs 17 months; p<0.0001). Chemotherapy 16+ weeks prior to surgery improved OS compared to those who had surgery <16 weeks after starting chemotherapy. While there was no difference with regards to type of resection (partial vs simple vs modified radical mastectomy), clear margins were imperative to optimize OS. Conclusions: Patients with stage IV breast cancer treated at community hospitals also demonstrate improved OS after primary tumor extirpation, especially in the context of a multimodality approach combining chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy preceding surgery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document