Socioeconomic disparity, access to care and patient relevant outcomes after kidney allograft failure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Hui Sheryl Wong ◽  
Germaine Wong ◽  
David W Johnson ◽  
Stephen McDonald ◽  
Philip Clayton ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Edoardo La Porta ◽  
Ester Conversano ◽  
Daniela Zugna ◽  
Roberta Camilla ◽  
Raffaella Labbadia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The need for dialysis after kidney allograft failure (DAGF) is among the top five reasons for dialysis initiation, making this an important topic in clinical nephrology. However, data are scarce on dialysis choice after transplantation and clinical outcomes for DAGF in children. Methods Patients receiving chronic dialysis < 18 years were recorded from January 1991 to January 2019 by the Italian Registry of Pediatric Chronic Dialysis (IRPCD). We investigated factors influencing choice of dialysis modality, patient outcome in terms of mortality, switching dialysis modality, and kidney transplantation. Results Among 118 patients receiving DAGF, 41 (35%) were treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 77 (65%) with haemodialysis (HD). Significant predictors for treatment with PD were younger age at dialysis start (OR 0.85 per year increase [95%CI 0.72–1.00]) and PD use before kidney transplantation (OR 8.20 [95%CI 1.82–37.01]). Patients entering DAGF in more recent eras (OR 0.87 per year increase [95%CI 0.80–0.94]) and with more than one dialysis modality before kidney transplantation (OR 0.56 for being treated with PD [0.12–2.59]) were more likely to be initiated on HD. As compared to patients on HD, those treated with PD exhibited increased but non-significant mortality risk (HR 2.15 [95%CI 0.54–8.6]; p = 0.28) and higher prevalence of dialysis-related complications during DAGF (p = 0.002) Conclusions Patients entering DAGF in more recent years are more likely to be initiated on HD. In this specific population of children, use of PD seems associated with a more complicated course. Graphical abstract A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e600
Author(s):  
F. De La Rosa Kehrmann ◽  
L. García González ◽  
J.A. Martínez-Flores ◽  
J.M. Duarte Ojeda ◽  
M. Pamplona Casamayor ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 324-326
Author(s):  
P.-N. Wong ◽  
A. N. H. Chan ◽  
K.-Y. Lo ◽  
Y.-Y. Wong ◽  
S.-K. Mak ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Varas ◽  
María José Pérez-Sáez ◽  
Rosa Ramos ◽  
Jose Ignacio Merello ◽  
Angel Luis M de Francisco ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 384
Author(s):  
R. B. Mannon ◽  
A. J. Matas ◽  
R. Leduc ◽  
J. M. Cecka ◽  
F. Cosio ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 807-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadiesda A. Costa ◽  
Abhijit V. Kshirsagar ◽  
Lily Wang ◽  
Randal K. Detwiler ◽  
M. Alan Brookhart

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-348
Author(s):  
Fahad Aziz ◽  
Ali Gardezi ◽  
Brenda Muth ◽  
Justin Blazel ◽  
Neetika Garg ◽  
...  

Background: The effects of delayed graft function on long-term kidney allograft outcomes are poorly defined among simultaneous liver and kidney transplant recipients. Methods: We analyzed data of all simultaneous liver and kidney recipients transplanted at the University of Wisconsin between 2010 and 2017. Risk factors for the development of delayed graft function, kidney graft failure, and patient mortality were outcomes of interest. Results: There were a total of 60 simultaneous liver and kidney recipients; 28 (47%) had delayed graft function. After adjustment for multiple variables, we found that pretransplant dialysis >6 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.6, 95% CI: 1.23-25.59, P = .02), pretransplant albumin <3 g/dL (HR = 5.75, 95% CI: 1.76-16.94, P = .003), and presence of pretransplant diabetes (HR = 2.5, 95% CI: 0.97-4.77, P = .05) were significantly associated with delayed graft function. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant albumin <3 (HR = 4.86, 95% CI: 1.07-22.02, P = .02) was associated with a higher risk of all-cause kidney allograft failure, whereas the duration of delayed graft function (HR = 1.07 per day, 95% CI: 1.01-1.14, P = .01) was associated with a higher risk of death-censored kidney allograft failure. The presence of delayed graft function was not associated with all-cause or death-censored kidney or liver allograft failure. Similarly, the presence of delayed graft function was not associated with patient mortality. Conclusion: The incidence of delayed graft function was high in simultaneous liver and kidney recipients. However, with appropriate management, delayed graft function may not have a negative impact on patient or kidney allograft survival.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac E. Hall ◽  
Enver Akalin ◽  
Jonathan S. Bromberg ◽  
Mona D. Doshi ◽  
Tom Greene ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. e46-e56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabet Van Loon ◽  
Jelle Bernards ◽  
Amaryllis H. Van Craenenbroeck ◽  
Maarten Naesens

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document