scholarly journals A prospective study of the prevalence of corneal surface disease in dogs receiving prophylactic topical lubrication under general anesthesia

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Dawson ◽  
Rick F. Sanchez
2021 ◽  
pp. 102595
Author(s):  
kourosh Farazmehr ◽  
Mohamad Aryafar ◽  
Farshid Gholami ◽  
Giti Dehghanmanshadi ◽  
Seyed Sepideh Hosseini

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 432-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rex N. Ponnudurai ◽  
Andrea Clarke-Moore ◽  
Ifeyinwa Ekulide ◽  
Manasee Sant ◽  
Krissy Choi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Shristi Shah

Background: Prevalence of difficult intubation is estimated as 3 -18% during routine anesthesia. There are various bedside tests to predict the difficult intubation, like Mallampati test, Thyromental distance, Sternomental distance and mouth opening. However, the prevalence and prediction in Nepalese population is still not estimated. So this study is to see the prevalence and to compare the efficacy of airway parameters to predict the difficult intubation in Nepalese population.Methods: A prospective study was done to estimate the prevalence and prediction of difficult intubation in Nepalese population. During six months period, 182 patients who were undergoing routine surgery under General anesthesia were included in the study. Mallampati grading, thyromental distance, mouth opening and sternomental distance were recorded in preoperative assessment. Cormack and Lehane grading were done during intubation and Grade I and II are considered as easy intubation/ laryngoscopy and III and IV are considered as difficult intubation.Results: The prevalence of difficult intubation was 4.9%. Sensitivity of different tests were as follows; Mallampati test – 55%, thyromental distance – 33%, mouth opening – 22% and sternomental distance – 11%. The Specificity of the test as Mallampati test – 98%, thyromental distance – 89%, mouth opening – 96% and sternomental distance – 97%. So the Mallampati test is more sensitive and specific among the tests done.Conclusion: This prospective study shows that the prevalence of difficult intubation is not different in Nepalese population and the bedside predictors also are good tests that could be continued in our population.Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of Nepal 2015; 2(1): 17-20


Author(s):  
Shamna Mohammed ◽  
Nivedita Pereira

ABSTRACT Introduction National trends are showing statistically significant increase in the thyroid surgeries being performed by otorhinolaryngologist surgeons. There is a rising interest among the otorhinolaryngology surgeons subspecializing in head and neck surgeries to increase the horizons in the advancements in thyroid surgeries. Cervical epidural anesthesia (CEA) for thyroid surgeries is gaining popularity over general anesthesia (GA) for the various advantages it offers. Objective This prospective study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness and ease of thyroidectomy under CEA as compared to GA. Materials and methods A prospective study of total of 30 patients undergoing thyroid surgery from two teaching hospitals. They were randomly allotted into CEA and GA groups of 15 members each. Results In the CEA group, postoperative comfort and economic feasibility were found to be better compared to GA group. The blood volume loss was lesser in the CEA group. The CEA group also offered the added advantage of vocal cord monitoring by voice contact during the surgery. Both the CEA and GA group maintained hemodynamic stability. There were no complications in both the groups. Conclusion Even though thyroid surgery is currently being performed mostly under GA, CEA must be considered for thyroid surgeries routinely. CEA offers a number of advantages of GA in selected cases. This study has proved that CEA has distinct advantages over GA in thyroidectomies. Considering the ease and effectiveness of CEA, it is as good as GA, if not better, even in routine thyroidectomies. How to cite this article Mohammed S, Santosh UP, Pereira N. Comparison of Cervical Epidural Anesthesia and General Anesthesia for Thyroid Surgery. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Clin 2014;6(1):1-4.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document