A Sequential Two-Step Design Framework for Deformable Mechanical Metamaterials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sree Kalyan Patiballa ◽  
Girish Krishnan
Author(s):  
Sree Kalyan Patiballa ◽  
Girish Krishnan

Abstract Deformable metamaterials are materials that are made up of several repeating elastic building blocks whose geometries can be tailored to obtain a specified global shape change or stiffness behavior. They are deemed useful in soft robotics, shape morphing mechanisms, stretchable electronics, wearable devices, and devices that adapt according to their environment. This paper presents a two-step sequential design framework for the synthesis of deformable mechanical metamaterials where (a) topology optimization is used to map global deformation requirement to local elasticity matrix, followed by (b) a selection of building block microstructure geometry from a database and refining it to match the elasticity requirement. The first step is accomplished through a unique parameterization scheme that enables the classification of the planar orthotropic elasticity matrix into four distinct classes. The second step uses a kinetostatic framework known as load flow visualization to populate candidate microstructure geometries within these four classes. Finally, the framework is validated for the design of a cantilever beam with a specified lateral stiffness requirement and the design of planar sheets that exhibit sinusoidal deformation patterns.


Author(s):  
Linda MEIJER-WASSENAAR ◽  
Diny VAN EST

How can a supreme audit institution (SAI) use design thinking in auditing? SAIs audit the way taxpayers’ money is collected and spent. Adding design thinking to their activities is not to be taken lightly. SAIs independently check whether public organizations have done the right things in the right way, but the organizations might not be willing to act upon a SAI’s recommendations. Can you imagine the role of design in audits? In this paper we share our experiences of some design approaches in the work of one SAI: the Netherlands Court of Audit (NCA). Design thinking needs to be adapted (Dorst, 2015a) before it can be used by SAIs such as the NCA in order to reflect their independent, autonomous status. To dive deeper into design thinking, Buchanan’s design framework (2015) and different ways of reasoning (Dorst, 2015b) are used to explore how design thinking can be adapted for audits.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsuki Tsushima ◽  
Ryo Higuchi ◽  
Hitoshi Arizono ◽  
Masato Tamayama

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (19) ◽  
pp. 1034-1037
Author(s):  
Shunjie Dong ◽  
Weiqing Ji ◽  
Hailong Yao ◽  
Cheng Zhuo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document