Application of Deep Transfer Learning and Uncertainty Quantification for Process Identification in Powder Bed Fusion

Author(s):  
Piyush Pandita ◽  
Sayan Ghosh ◽  
Vipul Gupta ◽  
Andrey Meshkov ◽  
Liping Wang

Abstract Accurate identification and modeling of process maps in additive manufacturing remains a pertinent challenge. To ensure high quality and reliability of the finished product researchers rely on models that entail the physics of the process as a computer code or conduct laboratory experiments which are expensive and oftentimes demands significant logistic and overheads. Physics based computational modeling has shown promise in alleviating the aforementioned challenge, albeit with limitations like physical approximations, model-form uncertainty, and limited experimental data. This calls for modeling methods that can combine limited experimental and simulation data in a computationally efficient manner, in order to achieve the desired properties in the manufactured parts. In this paper, we focus on demonstrating the impact of probabilistic modeling and uncertainty quantification on powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing by focusing on the following three milieu: a) accelerating the parameter development processes associated with laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process of metals, b) quantifying uncertainty and identifying missing physical correlations in the computational model, and c) transferring learned process maps from a source to a target process. These tasks demonstrate the application of multi-fidelity modeling, global sensitivity analysis, intelligent design of experiments and deep transfer learning for a meso-scale meltpool model of the additive manufacturing process.

Author(s):  
Paul Witherell ◽  
Shaw Feng ◽  
Timothy W. Simpson ◽  
David B. Saint John ◽  
Pan Michaleris ◽  
...  

In this paper, we advocate for a more harmonized approach to model development for additive manufacturing (AM) processes, through classification and metamodeling that will support AM process model composability, reusability, and integration. We review several types of AM process models and use the direct metal powder bed fusion AM process to provide illustrative examples of the proposed classification and metamodel approach. We describe how a coordinated approach can be used to extend modeling capabilities by promoting model composability. As part of future work, a framework is envisioned to realize a more coherent strategy for model development and deployment.


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Zhang ◽  
Raiyan Seede ◽  
Austin Whitt ◽  
David Shoukr ◽  
Xueqin Huang ◽  
...  

Purpose There is recent emphasis on designing new materials and alloys specifically for metal additive manufacturing (AM) processes, in contrast to AM of existing alloys that were developed for other traditional manufacturing methods involving considerably different physics. Process optimization to determine processing recipes for newly developed materials is expensive and time-consuming. The purpose of the current work is to use a systematic printability assessment framework developed by the co-authors to determine windows of processing parameters to print defect-free parts from a binary nickel-niobium alloy (NiNb5) using laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) metal AM. Design/methodology/approach The printability assessment framework integrates analytical thermal modeling, uncertainty quantification and experimental characterization to determine processing windows for NiNb5 in an accelerated fashion. Test coupons and mechanical test samples were fabricated on a ProX 200 commercial LPBF system. A series of density, microstructure and mechanical property characterization was conducted to validate the proposed framework. Findings Near fully-dense parts with more than 99% density were successfully printed using the proposed framework. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of as-printed parts showed low variability, good tensile strength of up to 662 MPa and tensile ductility 51% higher than what has been reported in the literature. Originality/value Although many literature studies investigate process optimization for metal AM, there is a lack of a systematic printability assessment framework to determine manufacturing process parameters for newly designed AM materials in an accelerated fashion. Moreover, the majority of existing process optimization approaches involve either time- and cost-intensive experimental campaigns or require the use of proprietary computational materials codes. Through the use of a readily accessible analytical thermal model coupled with statistical calibration and uncertainty quantification techniques, the proposed framework achieves both efficiency and accessibility to the user. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that following this framework results in printed parts with low degrees of variability in their mechanical properties.


2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Weng Hoh Lee ◽  
Linmin Wu ◽  
Hyun-Hee Choi ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 101438
Author(s):  
Zachary A. Young ◽  
Qilin Guo ◽  
Niranjan D. Parab ◽  
Cang Zhao ◽  
Minglei Qu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
C. J. J. Torrent ◽  
P. Krooß ◽  
T. Niendorf

AbstractIn additive manufacturing, the thermal history of a part determines its final microstructural and mechanical properties. The factors leading to a specific temperature profile are diverse. For the integrity of a parameter setting established, periphery variations must also be considered. In the present study, iron was processed by electron beam powder bed fusion. Parts realized by two process runs featuring different build plate sizes were analyzed. It is shown that the process temperature differs significantly, eventually affecting the properties of the processed parts.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document