Cooling of Steel Spherical Balls by Natural Convection and Radiation Heat Transfer in Unsteady State

2021 ◽  
pp. 149-156
Author(s):  
M. Kemal Atesmen
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Natural Convection ◽  
Radiation Heat Transfer ◽  
Unsteady State ◽  
Radiation Heat

scholarly journals Influence of Varying Pressure on Natural Convection and Radiation Heat Transfer in an Enclosure

PAMM ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 575-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Langebach ◽  
Stephan Senin ◽  
Christian Karcher
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Natural Convection ◽  
Radiation Heat Transfer ◽  
Radiation Heat

Natural Convection and Radiation Heat Transfer From an Array of Inclined Pin Fins

1989 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Alessio ◽  
D. A. Kaminski
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Natural Convection ◽  
Radiation Heat Transfer ◽  
Radiation Heat ◽  
Pin Fins

2D Natural Convection and Radiation Heat Transfer Simulations of a PWR Fuel Assembly Within a Constant Temperature Support Structure

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo E. Araya Go´mez ◽  
Miles Greiner
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Natural Convection ◽  
Fuel Assembly ◽  
Heat Generation ◽  
Temperature Difference ◽  
Wall Temperature ◽  
Radiation Heat Transfer ◽  
Radiation Heat ◽  
Fuel Rods ◽  
Water Reactor

Two-dimensional simulations of steady natural convection and radiation heat transfer for a 14×14 pressurized water reactor (PWR) spent nuclear fuel assembly within a square basket tube of a typical transport package were conducted using a commercial computational fluid dynamics package. The assembly is composed of 176 heat generating fuel rods and 5 larger guide tubes. The maximum cladding temperature was determined for a range of assembly heat generation rates and uniform basket wall temperatures, with both helium and nitrogen backfill gases. The results are compared with those from earlier simulations of a 7×7 boiling water reactor (BWR). Natural convection/radiation simulations exhibited measurably lower cladding temperatures only when nitrogen is the backfill gas and the wall temperature is below 100°C. The reduction in temperature is larger for the PWR assembly than it was for the BWR. For nitrogen backfill, a ten percent increase in the cladding emissivity (whose value is not well characterized) causes a 4.7% reduction in the maximum cladding to wall temperature difference in the PWR, compared to 4.3% in the BWR at a basket wall temperature of 400°C. Helium backfill exhibits reductions of 2.8% and 3.1% for PWR and BWR respectively. Simulations were performed in which each guide tube was replaced with four heat generating fuel rods, to give a homogeneous array. They show that the maximum cladding to wall temperature difference versus total heat generation within the assembly is not sensitive to this geometric variation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document