Enhancement of Pool Boiling and Critical Heat Flux in Self-Rewetting Fluids at Above Atmospheric Pressures

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Morovati ◽  
Hitesh Bindra ◽  
Shuji Esaki ◽  
Masahiro Kawaji
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Heat Pipes ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Bubble Sizes ◽  
Butanol Solution

Pool boiling experiments have been conducted with a self-rewetting fluid consisting of an aqueous butanol solution to study the boiling heat transfer enhancement at pressures of 1 ∼ 4 bars. Although self-rewetting fluids have been used to enhance the performance of heat pipes, boiling heat transfer characteristics are yet to be fully understood especially at pressures above atmospheric. Pool boiling experiments with aqueous butanol solutions were performed using an electrically heated platinum wire to obtain pool boiling heat transfer data up to the Critical Heat Flux (CHF). Aqueous butanol solutions with butanol concentrations 2–7% showed enhanced heat transfer coefficients and CHF data at various pressure levels. In comparison to water, aqueous butanol solutions showed 20–270% higher values of CHF at pressures up to 4 bars. The bubble sizes were also observed to be significantly smaller in self-rewetting fluids compared to those in water at the same pressure. This observation was consistent even at higher pressures. However, for the highest butanol concentration tested (7%), the CHF enhancement was diminished at higher pressures.

Nucleate Pool Boiling Heat Transfer of R134a and R134a-PVE Lubricant Mixtures on Smooth and Five Enhanced Tubes

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Tao Ji ◽  
Ding-Cai Zhang ◽  
Nan Feng ◽  
Jian-Fei Guo ◽  
Mitsuharu Numata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Saturation Temperature ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Pool Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Enhanced Tubes ◽  
Mass Fractions

Pool boiling heat transfer coefficients of R134a with different lubricant mass fractions for one smooth tube and five enhanced tubes were tested at a saturation temperature of 6°C. The lubricant used was polyvinyl ether. The lubrication mass fractions were 0.25%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0%, 3.0%, 5.0%, 7.0%, and 10.0%, respectively. Within the tested heat flux range, from 9000 W/m2 to 90,000 W/m2, the lubricant generally has a different influence on pool boiling heat transfer of these six tubes.

Nucleate boiling heat transfer coefficients of halogenated refrigerants up to critical heat fluxes

2009 ◽  
Vol 223 (6) ◽  
pp. 1415-1424 ◽  
Author(s):  
K-J Park ◽  
D Jung ◽  
S E Shim
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Heat Fluxes ◽  
Nucleate Pool Boiling ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Average Deviation ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients

In this work, nucleate pool boiling heat transfer coefficients (HTCs) of five refrigerants of differing vapour pressures are measured on a horizontal, smooth copper surface of 9.53×9.53 mm. The tested refrigerants are R123, R152a, R134a, R22, and R32 and HTCs are taken from 10 kW/m2 to the critical heat flux (CHF) of each refrigerant. Wall and fluid temperatures are measured directly by thermocouples located underneath the test surface and in the liquid pool, respectively. Test results show that nucleate pool boiling HTCs of halogenated refrigerants increase as the heat flux and vapour pressure increase. This typical trend is maintained even at high heat fluxes above 200 kW/m2. Zuber's prediction equation for CHF is quite accurate showing a maximum deviation of 21 per cent for all refrigerants tested. For all refrigerants, Stephan and Abdelsalam's well-known correlation underpredicted nucleate boiling HTC data up to the CHF with an average deviation of 21.3 per cent, while Cooper's correlation overpredicted the data with an average deviation of 14.2 per cent. On the other hand, Gorenflo's and Jung et al.'s correlations showed 5.8 and 6.4 per cent deviations, respectively, in the entire nucleate boiling range up to the CHF.

A Painting Technique to Enhance Pool Boiling Heat Transfer in Saturated FC-72

1995 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. O’Connor ◽  
S. M. You
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Reference Surface ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Pool Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Enhanced Surface

A benign method of generating a surface microstructure that provides pool boiling heat transfer enhancement is introduced. Pool boiling heat transfer results from an enhanced, horizontally oriented, rectangular surface immersed in saturated FC-72, indicate up to an 85 percent decrease in incipient superheat, a 70 to 80 percent reduction in nucleate boiling superheats, and a ∼ 109 percent increase in the critical heat flux (CHF = 30 W/cm2), beyond that of the nonpainted reference surface. For higher heat flux conditions (19 to 30 W/cm2), localized dryout results in increased wall superheats (8 to 48°C). The enhanced surface heat transfer coefficients are four times higher than those from the reference surface and similar to those from the Union Carbide High Flux surface. Photographs that identify differences in bubble size and departure characteristics between the painted and reference surfaces are presented.

Numerical and Experimental Investigation Into the Effects of Nanoparticle Mass Fraction and Bubble Size on Boiling Heat Transfer of TiO2–Water Nanofluid

2016 ◽  
Vol 138 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cong Qi ◽  
Yongliang Wan ◽  
Lin Liang ◽  
Zhonghao Rao ◽  
Yimin Li
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Bubble Size ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Mass Fraction ◽  
Experimental Methods ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Mass Fractions ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer Coefficient ◽  
Bubble Sizes

Considering mass transfer and energy transfer between liquid phase and vapor phase, a mixture model for boiling heat transfer of nanofluid is established. In addition, an experimental installation of boiling heat transfer is built. The boiling heat transfer of TiO2–water nanofluid is investigated by numerical and experimental methods, respectively. Thermal conductivity, viscosity, and boiling bubble size of TiO2–water nanofluid are experimentally investigated, and the effects of different nanoparticle mass fractions, bubble sizes and superheat on boiling heat transfer are also discussed. It is found that the boiling bubble size in TiO2–water nanofluid is only one-third of that in de-ionized water. It is also found that there is a critical nanoparticle mass fraction (wt.% = 2%) between enhancement and degradation for TiO2–water nanofluid. Compared with water, nanofluid enhances the boiling heat transfer coefficient by 77.7% when the nanoparticle mass fraction is lower than 2%, while it reduces the boiling heat transfer by 30.3% when the nanoparticle mass fraction is higher than 2%. The boiling heat transfer coefficients increase with the superheat for water and nanofluid. A mathematic correlation between heat flux and superheat is obtained in this paper.

Boiling Heat Transfer and Critical Heat Flux Enhancement of Upward- and Downward-Facing Heater in Nanofluids

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Zuhairi Sulaiman ◽  
Masahiro Takamura ◽  
Kazuki Nakahashi ◽  
Tomio Okawa
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Critical Heat Flux ◽  
Boiling Heat Transfer ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Nucleate Boiling ◽  
Flux Enhancement ◽  
Optimum Configuration ◽  
Wall Superheat ◽  
Nucleate Boiling Heat Transfer

Boiling heat transfer (BHT) and critical heat flux (CHF) performance were experimentally studied for saturated pool boiling of water-based nanofluids. In present experimental works, copper heaters of 20 mm diameter with titanium-oxide (TiO2) nanocoated surface were produced in pool boiling of nanofluid. Experiments were performed in both upward and downward facing nanofluid coated heater surface. TiO2 nanoparticle was used with concentration ranging from 0.004 until 0.4 kg/m3 and boiling time of tb = 1, 3, 10, 20, 40, and 60 mins. Distilled water was used to observed BHT and CHF performance of different nanofluids boiling time and concentration configurations. Nucleate boiling heat transfer observed to deteriorate in upward facing heater, however; in contrast effect of enhancement for downward. Maximum enhancements of CHF for upward- and downward-facing heater are 2.1 and 1.9 times, respectively. Reduction of mean contact angle demonstrate enhancement on the critical heat flux for both upward-facing and downward-facing heater configuration. However, nucleate boiling heat transfer shows inconsistency in similar concentration with sequence of boiling time. For both downward- and upward-facing nanocoated heater's BHT and CHF, the optimum configuration denotes by C = 400 kg/m3 with tb = 1 min which shows the best increment of boiling curve trend with lowest wall superheat ΔT = 25 K and critical heat flux enhancement of 2.02 times.

Forced Convective Boiling of Refrigerant HCFC123 in a Mini-Tube

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Araga ◽  
Keisuke Okamoto ◽  
Keiji Murata
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Heat Flux ◽  
Mass Flux ◽  
Pool Boiling ◽  
Constant Heat Flux ◽  
Transfer Coefficients ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Convective Boiling ◽  
Frictional Pressure Drop ◽  
Heat Transfer Coefficients

This paper presents an experimental investigation of the forced convective boiling of refrigerant HCFC123 in a mini-tube. The inner diameters of the test tubes, D, were 0.51 mm and 0.30 mm. First, two-phase frictional pressure drops were measured under adiabatic conditions and compared with the correlations for conventional tubes. The frictional pressure drop data were lower than the correlation for conventional tubes. However, the data were qualitatively in accord with those for conventional tubes and were correlated in the form φL2−1/Xtt. Next, heat transfer coefficients were measured under the conditions of constant heat flux and compared with those for conventional tubes and for pool boiling. The heat transfer characteristics for mini-tubes were different from those for conventional tubes and quite complicated. The heat transfer coefficients for D = 0.51 mm increased with heat flux but were almost independent of mass flux. Although the heat transfer coefficients were higher than those for a conventional tube with D = 10.3 mm and for pool boiling in the low quality region, they decreased gradually with increasing quality. The heat transfer coefficients for D = 0.30 mm were higher than those for D = 0.51 mm and were almost independent of both mass flux and heat flux.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document