CoilTAC® Coil Thrust and Carry

Author(s):  
Rick Stewart ◽  
Jim Crawford ◽  
Tom Harper ◽  
Larry Kirspel

In producing offshore oil and gas fields there is a need for maintaining flow assurance in the associated pipelines. Restricted and plugged pipelines result in loss of production which is loss of revenue. It is common for these pipelines to exceed the length that can be reached by conventional coiled tubing when cleaning obstructions becomes necessary. Paraffin, asphaltine’s, hydrates and sand are a few of the contaminants that can obstruct flow and cause plugging. Historically, pipeline intervention has been limited to conventional coiled tubing with a reach of only +/−5,000’. A typical maintenance practice involved “pigging” the pipeline with a poly foam pig to remove any obstruction. Under severe conditions multiple pigs with graduated ODs were used. The problem with the poly foam pig is that the flexibility allows it to be forced through a smaller ID, leaving the restriction in place. CoilTAC® (Coil Thrust and Carry), developed by Superior Energy Services, was designed specifically to extend the reach of conventional coiled tubing for pipeline intervention while negotiating a minimum 5D bend. The Thruster was designed for line sizes with internal diameters from 2.900” up. This Thruster system eliminates the compression force on the coiled tubing and has been proven to 14,800’, and it has the ability to exceed 50,000’. The Thruster utilizes a “mechanical intelligence” which is present into the thruster with takes into consideration applied force parameters prior to the cleanout procedure. The key factors are: working pressure of the pipeline, length of the pipeline and the length and size of the coiled tubing to be carried by the thruster. The forward motion of the thruster is initiated by annular pressure applied between the coiled tubing and the inside diameter of the pipeline. The pressure energizes the cups and moves the thruster forward. At a preset pressure, a check value opens inside the thruster allowing fluid to pass to the front of the tool and exit through a series of ports. This causes a washing/jetting action in front of the thruster as it moves down the pipeline. The debris that is removed from the pipeline is returned through the center of the thruster. Retrieving the thruster is accomplished by pumping down the center of the coiled tubing which applies pressure to the front of the tool to reverse the Thruster out of the pipeline. The returns during reverse thrusting are then taken on the coiled tubing/pipeline annulus. Pump pressure moves the thruster in and out of the pipeline not the coiled tubing injector, thus eliminating the helical buckling forces and extending the reach of the coiled tubing. Historically, paraffin-laden pipelines had to be abandoned and new lines laid at great expense to the operator — it was difficult to abandon subsea pipelines without complete removal. Now there is an option with the CoilTAC® system.

2021 ◽  
Vol 775 ◽  
pp. 145485
Author(s):  
Yiqian Liu ◽  
Hao Lu ◽  
Yudong Li ◽  
Hong Xu ◽  
Zhicheng Pan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xiaozhi Wang ◽  
Booki Kim ◽  
Yanming Zhang ◽  
Ping Liao

Floating production, storage and offloading systems (FPSOs) have been widely used in the development of offshore oil and gas fields because of their many attractive features. These features include a large work area and storage capacity, mobility (if desired), relatively low construction cost and good stability. They are mostly ship shaped, either converted from existing tankers or purpose built. The hull structural scantling design for tankers may be applicable to FPSOs; however, FPSOs have their own unique characteristics. FPSOs are located at specific locations with a dynamic loading that is quite different from that arising from unrestricted ocean service conditions for tankers. It is also noted that the wave conditions in recent FPSO applications may be very complicated when operating in areas such as those offshore West Africa and offshore Brazil where both seas and swells exist and propagate in different directions. In this paper, the unique FPSO operational aspects, especially the load assessment due to on-site environments will be described. The methodology of handling complicated wave conditions in fatigue assessment will be addressed. Special considerations for converted FPSOs, which need to take into account their operational history as a trading tanker and low cycle fatigue due to FPSO operations, will also be introduced. Case studies will be presented and appropriate analysis methodology will be summarized. The methodology has also been adopted by ABS Guide, see ABS [1].


1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
M. Thatcher ◽  
D.B. Marietta

Subsea production systems have been an accepted method of developing offshore oil and gas fields since the installation of the first subsea trees in the early 1960s offshore California. Generally subsea completions have been done from floating drilling vessels on wells with subsea wellhead equipment. A number of wells have been completed subsea by bottom supported jackup rigs on wells drilled using mudline suspension equipment. The subsea completion equipment and methods utilised to adapt mudline suspension wells for a subsea production tree are described. This method of completion offers important benefits as it allows completion of wildcat or delineation wells, it can be used in areas of small, scattered reservoirs, and it can be used in conjunction with floating production systems. The cost associated with these subsea completions is roughly equivalent to those of standard subsea completions from floating vessels. An overview of a typical completion system is presented and compared.


1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. P. Thiagarajan ◽  
S. Finch

Turret-moored floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels have found application in several offshore oil and gas fields in Australia’s North West Shelf (NWS). These vessels are either custom-built or converted tankers, with an internal or external turret. The position of an internal turret is decided based on a number of design considerations, primarily, available deck and interior space, and weathervaning capabilities. It is known that turret position can influence vertical motions and accelerations of a vessel, but this factor has not been given much importance, in comparison with the effects on the horizontal plane motions, primarily surge. This paper presents the results of a pilot study conducted at the Australian Maritime College, Tasmania, to study the vertical motions of a single-point moored FPSO model in waves, while systematically varying the mooring position across the length of the model. The displacement of the vessel was held constant at 50-percent-loaded condition. A single-point mooring system was designed and implemented on the model to simulate the prototype turret mooring system. Results show that the mooring location significantly affects the vertical motions and accelerations of the vessel. Astern turrets were found to produce higher heave and pitch than other locations tested. Although turrets positioned close to the longitudinal center of gravity produced the lowest overall motions, it is suggested that turret position forward of midships be preferred, as it provides a balance between lowering vertical motions and improving weathervaning characteristics.


Author(s):  
Chingiz Saibovich Guseinov ◽  
Dmitry Leonidovich Kulpin ◽  
Galie Hamzaevna Efimova

The article dwells upon the problem of developing offshore oil and gas fields around the world accompanied by producing not only stationary and semi-submersible rigs and drilling vessels, but also a large number of auxiliary vessels for various functional purposes. It would be impossible to extract offshore hydrocarbons under the sea bed without them. Special fleet was formed during the years of development of offshore oil and gas fields in the Russian Federation, the part of it being imported. In the upcoming years, our country will face some challenges related to the development of Arctic reservoirs which are mainly located in the long-frozen deep seas. Their development in deep water will only be possible with auxiliary fleet, as it will be necessary to build deep water drilling vessels and other facilities/vessels. The types of vessels of the modern oil and gas fleet are presented, depending on the area of navigation, the depth of use and the specifics of the work performed. It is noted that currently in world practice there are no examples of using proven drilling and production technologies in severe ice conditions, when ice thickness exceeds 2-3 m, because the modern ice-resistant stationary platforms can not withstand the load at a depth of more than 80-100 m. The auxiliary fleet will both service offshore rigs and ensure their long-term productivity and functionality. For the development of oil and gas fields in the long-frozen Arctic deep-sea areas it is necessary to create a full-fledged underwater oil and gas fleet.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document