Dual Gradient Drilling Will Control Shallow Hazards in Deepwater Environments

Author(s):  
Brandee A. Elieff ◽  
Jerome J. Schubert

Currently the “Pump and Dump” method employed by Exploration and Production (E&P) companies in deepwater is simply not enough to control increasingly dangerous and unpredictable shallow hazards. “Pump and Dump” requires a heavy dependence on accurate seismic data to avoid shallow gas zones; the kick detection methods are slow and unreliable, which results in a need for visual kick detection; and it does not offer dynamic well control methods of managing shallow hazards such as methane hydrates, shallow gas and shallow water flows. These negative aspects of “Pump and Dump” are in addition to the environmental impact, high drilling fluid (mud) costs and limited mud options. Dual gradient technology offers a closed system, which improves drilling most simply because the mud within the system is recycled. The amount of required mud is reduced, the variety of acceptable mud types is increased and chemical additives to the mud become an option. This closed system also offers more accurate and faster kick detection methods in addition to those that are already used in the “Pump and Dump” method. It has the potential to prevent the formation of hydrates by adding hydrate inhibitors to the drilling mud. And more significantly, this system successfully controls dissociating methane hydrates, over pressured shallow gas zones and shallow water flows. Dual gradient technology improves deepwater drilling operations by removing fluid constraints and offering proactive well control over dissociating hydrates, shallow water flows and over pressured shallow gas zones. There are several clear advantages for dual gradient technology: economic, technical and significantly improved safety, which is achieved through superior well control.

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (11) ◽  
pp. 3876-3894 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali R. Mohebalhojeh ◽  
David G. Dritschel

Abstract The representation of nonlinear shallow-water flows poses severe challenges for numerical modeling. The use of contour advection with contour surgery for potential vorticity (PV) within the contour-advective semi-Lagrangian (CASL) algorithm makes it possible to handle near-discontinuous distributions of PV with an accuracy beyond what is accessible to conventional algorithms used in numerical weather and climate prediction. The emergence of complex distributions of the materially conserved quantity PV, in the absence of forcing and dissipation, results from large-scale shearing and deformation and is a common feature of high Reynolds number flows in the atmosphere and oceans away from boundary layers. The near-discontinuous PV in CASL sets a limit on the actual numerical accuracy of the Eulerian, grid-based part of CASL. For the spherical shallow-water equations, the limit is studied by comparing the accuracy of CASL algorithms with second-order-centered, fourth-order-compact, and sixth-order-supercompact finite differencing in latitude in conjunction with a spectral treatment in longitude. The comparison is carried out on an unstable midlatitude jet at order one Rossby number and low Froude number that evolves into complex vortical structures with sharp gradients of PV. Quantitative measures of global conservation of energy and angular momentum, and of imbalance as diagnosed using PV inversion by means of Bolin–Charney balance, indicate that fourth-order differencing attains the highest numerical accuracy achievable for such nonlinear, advectively dominated flows.


2017 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 189-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Ivanova ◽  
S.L. Gavrilyuk ◽  
B. Nkonga ◽  
G.L. Richard

2020 ◽  
pp. 1097-1103
Author(s):  
A. Navas-Montilla ◽  
C. Juez ◽  
M.J. Franca ◽  
J. Murillo

Shallow Flows ◽  
2004 ◽  
pp. 593-600
Author(s):  
Lars Bergdahl ◽  
Claes Eskilsson ◽  
Spencer Sherwin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document