Residual Stresses and Stress Intensity Factor Calculations for an Orthotropic Steel Deck

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Qiang ◽  
Xin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Plate Thickness ◽  
Welding Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Fields ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Middle Section ◽  
Intensity Factors ◽  
Aspect Ratios ◽  
Steel Deck

Abstract The welding residual stress in an orthotopic steel deck is investigated through experimental measurements and finite-element simulations. The simulated residual stress fields are in reasonable agreement with the measured results. The weight function method are used to investigate the stress intensity factors (SIFs) at the surface and deepest points of the semi-elliptical surface cracks, subjected to a combination of external load and through-thickness welding residual stress. Different crack aspect ratios and relative depths are analyzed. The results reveal that the transverse residual stress is always tensile through the plate thickness at the middle section, which makes the SIFs of the surface and deepest points larger than those without considering the residual stress. However, the non-linear reduction for transverse residual stress through the thickness causes the SIFs to decrease for aspect ratios of 0.4, 0.6 and 1.0.

Effect of Welding Residual Stress on Stress Intensity Factors for Semi-Elliptical Surface Cracks in a Butt-Welded Steel Plate

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Qiang ◽  
Xin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Compressive Stress ◽  
Stress Intensity Factors ◽  
Steel Plate ◽  
Welding Residual Stress ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Intensity Factors ◽  
Longitudinal Residual Stress

The through-thickness distribution of welding residual stress in a 30-mm-thick butt-welded Q345qD steel plate has been investigated through experimental measurements and finite-element simulations. In this paper, the weight function and finite element methods are used to investigate the stress intensity factors (SIFs) at the surface and deepest points of the semi-elliptical surface cracks, subjected to a combination of external tensile load and through-thickness welding residual stress. Different crack aspect ratios and relative depths are analyzed. The results reveal that the longitudinal residual stress is always tensile through the plate thickness, which makes the SIFs of the surface and deepest points larger than those without considering the longitudinal residual stress. However, the transverse residual stress through the thickness presents tension–compression–tension, with the tensile transverse residual stress causing the SIFs to increase. When the crack tip enters the compressive stress region, the compressive stress offsets the external load and causes the SIFs to decrease.

Effect of Weld Residual Stress Fitting on Stress Intensity Factor for Circumferential Surface Cracks in Pipe

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Do-Jun Shim ◽  
Matthew Kerr ◽  
Steven Xu
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Stress Intensity Factors ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Intensity Factors ◽  
Weld Residual Stress ◽  
Order Polynomial

Recent studies have shown that the crack growth of PWSCC is mainly driven by the weld residual stress (WRS) within the dissimilar metal weld. The existing stress intensity factor (K) solutions for surface cracks in pipe typically require a 4th order polynomial stress distribution through the pipe wall thickness. However, it is not always possible to accurately represent the through thickness WRS with a 4th order polynomial fit and it is necessary to investigate the effect of the WRS fitting on the calculated stress intensity factors. In this paper, two different methods were used to calculate the stress intensity factor for a semi-elliptical circumferential surface crack in a pipe under a given set of simulated WRS. The first method is the Universal Weight Function Method (UWFM) where the through thickness WRS distribution can be represented as a piece-wise cubic fit. In the second method, the through thickness WRS profiles are represented as a 4th order polynomial curve fit (both using the entire wall thickness data and only using data up to the crack-tip). In addition, three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses (using the simulated weld residual stress) were conducted to serve as a reference solution. The results of this study demonstrate the potential sensitivity of stress intensity factors to 4th order polynomial fitting artifacts. The piece-wise WRS representations used in the UWFM was not sensitive to these fitting artifacts and the UWFM solutions were in good agreement with the FE results.

The Effects of Residual Stress Distribution and Component Geometry on the Stress Intensity Factor of Surface Cracks

2011 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumasa Miyazaki ◽  
Masahito Mochizuki
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Stress Distribution ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Stress Field ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Residual Stress Distribution ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Intensity Factors

The stress intensity factor estimated by the appropriate modeling of components is essential for the evaluation of crack growth behavior in stress corrosion cracking. For the appropriate modeling of a welded component with a crack, it is important to understand the effects of residual stress distribution and the geometry of the component on the stress intensity factor of the surface crack. In this study, the stress intensity factors of surface cracks under two assumed residual stress fields were calculated. As residual stress field, a bending type stress field (tension-compression) and a self-equilibrating stress field (tension-compression-tension) through the thickness were assumed, respectively. The geometries of the components were plate and piping. The assumed surface cracks for those evaluations were a long crack in the surface direction and a semi-elliptical surface crack. In addition, crack growth evaluations were conducted to clarify the effects of residual stress distribution and the geometry of the component. Here, the crack growth evaluation means simulating increments of crack depth and length using crack growth properties and stress intensity factors. The effects of residual stress distribution and component geometry on the stress intensity factor of surface cracks and the appropriate modeling of cracked components are discussed by comparing the stress intensity factors and the crack growth evaluations for surface cracks under residual stress fields.

Stress Intensity Factors for High Aspect Ratio Semi-Elliptical External Surface Cracks in Cylindrical Vessels

2014 ◽  
Vol 986-987 ◽  
pp. 882-886
Author(s):  
Hong Yu Qi ◽  
Peng Chao Guo
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Aspect Ratio ◽  
Stress Intensity Factors ◽  
High Aspect Ratio ◽  
External Surface ◽  
Superposition Principle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Intensity Factors ◽  
Aspect Ratios

External surface cracks can occur in cylindrical vessels due to damage and propagate in the manufacturing process and during service life. Most of research focuses on stress intensity factors for surface cracks with low aspect ratios, i.e., a/c ≤1.0. Situation may well arise where the aspect ratio of cracks is larger than one. An external longitudinal surface crack is assumed to be subjected to different types of hoop stress distributions acting perpendicular to the crack faces. The stress intensity factors (SIFs) along the crack front were determined through the three-dimensional finite element method. Then these results are used to compute approximate values of SIFs in the case of complex loadings by employing both the superposition principle and the power series expansions of the actual hoop stresses. It is found that the maximum stress intensity factor for external surface cracks with high aspect ratio occurs at different point to that with low aspect ratio.

Inner and Outer Cracks in Internally Pressurized Cylinders

1977 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. Kobayashi ◽  
N. Polvanich ◽  
A. F. Emery ◽  
W. J. Love
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Stress Intensity Factors ◽  
Finite Thickness ◽  
Internal Surface ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Single Edge ◽  
Intensity Factors ◽  
Curvature Effects ◽  
Aspect Ratios ◽  
Dimensional Finite Element

Stress intensity factors of pressurized surface cracks at the internal surface and un-pressurized surface cracks at the external surface of an internally pressurized cylinder are estimated from stress intensity factors of a semi-elliptical crack in a finite-thickness flat plate. Curvature effects of the cylinder are determined by comparing two-dimensional finite element solutions of fixed-grip, single edge-notched plates and single edge-notched cylinders. Stress intensity factors for semi-elliptical cracks with crack aspect ratios of b/a = 0.2 and 0.98 at crack depths up to 80 percent of the cylindrical wall thickness are shown for internally pressurized cylinders with outer to inner diameter ratios, Ro/Ri, ranging from 10:9 to 5:4 for outer surface cracks and to 3:2 for inner surface cracks.

Development of Stress Intensity Factors for Cracks With Large Aspect Ratios in Pipes and Plates

2016 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Kunio Hasegawa ◽  
Makoto Udagawa
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Wall Thickness ◽  
Stress Intensity Factors ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Influence Coefficient ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Intensity Factors ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Aspect Ratios ◽  
Pipe Radius

The stress intensity factors (SIFs) for pipes containing semi-elliptical surface cracks with large aspect ratios were calculated by finite-element analysis (FEA). The cracks were circumferential and axial surface cracks inside the pipes. The parameters of the SIFs are crack aspect ratio, crack depth, and the ratio of pipe radius to wall thickness. In comparing SIFs for plates and pipes, it can be clarified that SIFs for both plates and thin pipes with t/Ri ≤ 1/10 are almost the same, and the SIFs for plates can be used as a substitute for pipes with t/Ri ≤ 1/10, where t is the pipe wall thickness, and Ri is the inner radius of the pipe. This means that it is not necessary to provide SIF solutions for pipes with t/Ri ≤ 1/10, and it is suggested that the number of tables for influence coefficient values for pipes can be significantly reduced.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document