weld residual stress
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

193
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asma Manai

Welding is a joining process that leads to considerable change in the local material and the formation of welding residual stresses (RS). Welding residual stresses can be compressive (beneficial for the fatigue life) or tensile (harmful for the fatigue life). In this chapter, a probabilistic analysis of residual stresses distribution posterior to welding processes is carried out. Several researchers stated that the type of the introduced stresses either compressive or tensile depends on several factors. Some of these factors are listed in this chapter. Welding of mega-structures is carried out in the workshops, then a cutting process takes place to construct the exact size of the structural components. This cutting process has a significant effect on the weld residual stresses re-distribution. A study of the re-distribution of the weld residual stress after cutting was performed. It was found that independent of the weld seam length, the residual stresses re-distributed up to 60 % of the weld seam length.


ce/papers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 2504-2507
Author(s):  
Asma Manai

2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 193-205
Author(s):  
Yu-Ping Yang ◽  

Weld residual stress can contribute to the reduction of structure lifetime and accelerate the formation of fatigue cracks, brittle fractures, or stress corrosion cracking. Distortion can have a significant impact on the dimensional ac-curacy of assembly, structure strength, and fabrication cost. In the past two decades, there have been many significant and exciting developments in the prediction and mitigation of weld residual stress and distortion. This paper reviews the recent advances in mitigation techniques that have been applied in the structure design, manufacturing, and postweld stages. The techniques used in the structure design stage include selecting the type of weld joint and weld groove, using balanced welding, determining appropriate plate thickness and stiffener spacing, and considering distortion compensation. Mitigation techniques used in the manufacturing stage include welding sequence optimization, reducing welding heating input, selecting low-transformation-temperature filler metals, prebending, precambering, constraints, trailing and stationary cooling, in-processing rolling, transient thermal tensioning, and additional heat sources. Postweld mitigation techniques include postweld heating and mechanical treatment. Finally, the remaining challenges and new development needs were discussed to guide future development in the field of mitigating weld residual stress and distortion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (5) ◽  
pp. 151-170
Author(s):  
YU-PING YANG ◽  

Residual stresses and distortions are the result of complex interactions between welding heat input, the material’s high-temperature response, and joint constraint conditions. Both weld residual stress and distortion can significantly impair the performance and reliability of welded structures. In the past two decades, there have been many significant and exciting developments in the prediction and mitigation of weld residual stress and distortion. This paper reviews the recent advances in the prediction of weld residual stress and distortion by focusing on the numerical modeling theory and methods. The prediction methods covered in this paper include a thermo-mechanical-metallurgical method, simplified analysis methods, friction stir welding modeling methods, buckling distortion prediction methods, a welding cloud computational method, integrated manufacturing process modeling, and integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) weld modeling. Remaining challenges and new developments are also discussed to guide future predictions of weld residual stress and distortion.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 20200577
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Tagawa ◽  
Yasushi Morikage ◽  
Takahiro Kubo ◽  
Tsunehisa Handa ◽  
Yoshiki Mikami ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ben Pellereau ◽  
Simon Walter ◽  
Paul Pembury

Abstract Small bore austenitic stainless steel pipework is used in a number of nuclear plant systems. Many of these locations are subjected to large thermal shocks and therefore have high fatigue usage factors. Their justification therefore often includes a fatigue crack growth and fracture assessment, for which a key input is the residual stress associated with the welding process, in UK assessments these are typically taken from the R6 compendium. A common process used for these welds is manual tungsten inert gas welding, due to access difficulties each pass is usually completed in two halves. The stop-start locations for each weld run are sometimes stacked, especially in horizontal pipe runs where each weld operation starts at the bottom of the pipe and progresses upwards. The stack up of stop-start locations is likely to lead to considerable circumferential variation in weld residual stress, potentially resulting in stresses that locally exceed the R6 profiles. This paper presents results from a series of FE models for a single small bore pipe weld. The simulated weld is a 3-pass manual TIG weld with an EB insert in a 2 inch (50 mm) nominal diameter pipe. Both 2D and 3D models were run. The results of the modelling are then compared with measurements of weld mock-ups of the same weld (both with and without the stop-start stack-up). The results show that, local to the assumed stop location the predicted stresses do exceed even the R6 level 1 profile (a membrane stress equal to the 1% proof stress of the material). However, the locally enhanced stresses drop off quickly away from the peak location, so for defects of a size that may be a concern for a defect tolerance assessment, the R6 Level 1 and 2 profiles remains appropriate or bounding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document