scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Lenampicillin and Bacampicillin on Bacterial Pneumonia by Double Blind Method

1985 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-638
Author(s):  
Fumio MIKI ◽  
Yosiyasu IKUNO ◽  
Eiji INOUE ◽  
Minoru YOSIYAMA ◽  
Tetsuto MURATA ◽  
...  
1984 ◽  
Vol 58 (10) ◽  
pp. 1083-1113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumio MIKI ◽  
Akira SAITO ◽  
Masumi TOMIZAWA ◽  
Ichiro NAKAYAMA ◽  
Kazuo TAKEBE ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 865-884
Author(s):  
Rinzo SOEJIMA ◽  
Toshiharu MATSUSHIMA ◽  
Yoshihito NIKI ◽  
Hiroshi KAWANE ◽  
Masayasu KAWANISHI ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 982-1002
Author(s):  
Keiichi NAKAGAWA ◽  
Masaru KOYAMA ◽  
Akira SAITO ◽  
Masumi TOMIZAWA ◽  
Masatoshi OKAMOTO ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 62 (11) ◽  
pp. 973-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khoya SHIBA ◽  
Atsushi SAITO ◽  
Jingoro SHIMADA ◽  
Tadashi MIYAHARA ◽  
Soukichi ONODERA ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-226
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki KOBAYASHI ◽  
Tomoko NIHEI ◽  
Hiroaki TAKEDA ◽  
Kohta KOHNO ◽  
Akira SAITO ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 1078-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki KOBAYASHI ◽  
Shin KAWAI ◽  
Akira SAITO ◽  
Osamu YAJIMA ◽  
Masumi TOMIZAWA ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richard G Wunderink ◽  
Antoine Roquilly ◽  
Martin Croce ◽  
Daniel Rodriguez Gonzalez ◽  
Satoshi Fujimi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) are associated with high mortality rates. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tedizolid (administered as tedizolid phosphate) for treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Methods In this randomized, noninferiority, double-blind, double-dummy, global phase 3 trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous tedizolid phosphate 200 mg once daily for 7 days or intravenous linezolid 600 mg every 12 hours for 10 days. Treatment was 14 days in patients with concurrent gram-positive bacteremia. The primary efficacy end points were day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM; noninferiority margin, 10%) and investigator-assessed clinical response at test of cure (TOC; noninferiority margin, 12.5%) in the intention-to-treat population. Results Overall, 726 patients were randomized (tedizolid, n = 366; linezolid, n = 360). Baseline characteristics, including incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (31.3% overall), were well balanced. Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM rate: 28.1% and 26.4%, respectively (difference, –1.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: –8.2 to 4.7). Noninferiority of tedizolid was not demonstrated for investigator-assessed clinical cure at TOC (tedizolid, 56.3% vs linezolid, 63.9%; difference, –7.6%; 97.5% CI: –15.7 to 0.5). In post hoc analyses, no single factor accounted for the difference in clinical response between treatment groups. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 8.1% and 11.9% of patients who received tedizolid and linezolid, respectively. Conclusions Tedizolid was noninferior to linezolid for day 28 ACM in the treatment of gram-positive ventilated HABP/VABP. Noninferiority of tedizolid for investigator-assessed clinical response at TOC was not demonstrated. Both drugs were well tolerated. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02019420.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document