Installed jet noise prediction with Jet3D

2004 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 2538-2538
Author(s):  
Craig Hunter
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction

scholarly journals Jet-Surface Interaction Test: Far-Field Noise Results

2013 ◽  
Vol 135 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford A. Brown
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Radial Distance ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Surface Interaction ◽  
Shielding Effect ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Far Field ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Field Noise ◽  
Surface Length

Many configurations proposed for the next generation of aircraft rely on the wing or other aircraft surfaces to shield the engine noise from the observers on the ground. However, the ability to predict the shielding effect and any new noise sources that arise from the high-speed jet flow interacting with a hard surface is currently limited. Furthermore, quality experimental data from jets with surfaces nearby suitable for developing and validating noise prediction methods are usually tied to a particular vehicle concept and, therefore, very complicated. The Jet-Surface Interaction Tests are intended to supply a high quality set of data covering a wide range of surface geometries and positions and jet flows to researchers developing aircraft noise prediction tools. The initial goal is to measure the noise of a jet near a simple planar surface while varying the surface length and location in order to: (1) validate noise prediction schemes when the surface is acting only as a jet noise shield and when the jet-surface interaction is creating additional noise, and (2) determine regions of interest for future, more detailed, tests. To meet these objectives, a flat plate was mounted on a two-axis traverse in two distinct configurations: (1) as a shield between the jet and the observer and (2) as a reflecting surface on the opposite side of the jet from the observer. The surface length was varied between 2 and 20 jet diameters downstream of the nozzle exit. Similarly, the radial distance from the jet centerline to the surface face was varied between 1 and 16 jet diameters. Far-field and phased array noise data were acquired at each combination of surface length and radial location using two nozzles operating at jet exit conditions across several flow regimes: subsonic cold, subsonic hot, underexpanded, ideally expanded, and overexpanded supersonic. The far-field noise results, discussed here, show where the jet noise is partially shielded by the surface and where jet-surface interaction noise dominates the low frequency spectrum as a surface extends downstream and approaches the jet plume.

A hybrid LES/CAA method applied to jet noise prediction

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Odile Labbe ◽  
Christophe Peyret ◽  
Gilles Rahier ◽  
Maxime Huet
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction

Jet Noise Prediction: Validation and Physical Insight

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wouter C. van der Velden ◽  
Damiano Casalino ◽  
Pradeep Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Avinash Jammalamadaka ◽  
Yanbing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Physical Insight

Jet Noise Prediction via Low-order Machine Learning

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. Ruscher ◽  
Sivaram Gogineni ◽  
Andrew S. Tenney ◽  
Mark N. Glauser
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Low Order

scholarly journals Nozzles, turbulence, and jet noise prediction

2018 ◽  
Vol 860 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan B. Freund
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Accuracy ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Sound Field ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Large Eddy Simulations ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Modelling Procedure ◽  
Flow Turbulence

Jet noise prediction is notoriously challenging because only subtle features of the flow turbulence radiate sound. The article by Brès et al. (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 851, 2018, pp. 83–124) shows that a well-constructed modelling procedure for the nozzle turbulence can provide unprecedented sub-dB prediction accuracy with modest-scale large-eddy simulations, as confirmed by detailed comparison with turbulence and sound-field measurements. This both illuminates the essential mechanisms of the flow and facilitates prediction for engineering design.

Jet noise prediction via coupling large eddy simulation and stochastic modeling

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (4) ◽  
pp. 2491-2491
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Blake ◽  
VASILEIOS SASSANIS ◽  
David Thompson ◽  
Adrian Sescu ◽  
Yuji Hattori
Keyword(s):  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Stochastic Modeling ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

scholarly journals Anisotropic source modelling for turbulent jet noise prediction

2019 ◽  
Vol 377 (2159) ◽  
pp. 20190075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xihai Xu ◽  
Xiaodong Li
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Noise Source ◽  
Jet Noise ◽  
Source Model ◽  
Noise Prediction ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Acoustic Analogy ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Navier Stokes Equation ◽  
Anisotropic Source

An anisotropic component of the jet noise source model for the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equation-based jet noise prediction method is proposed. The modelling is based on Goldstein's generalized acoustic analogy, and both the fine-scale and large-scale turbulent noise sources are considered. To model the anisotropic characteristics of jet noise source, the Reynolds stress tensor is used in place of the turbulent kinetic energy. The Launder–Reece–Rodi model (LRR), combined with Menter's ω -equation for the length scale, with modified coefficients developed by the present authors, is used to calculate the mean flow velocities and Reynolds stresses accurately. Comparison between predicted results and acoustic data has been carried out to verify the accuracy of the new anisotropic source model. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Frontiers of aeroacoustics research: theory, computation and experiment’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document