scholarly journals Disruption of the head direction cell network impairs the parahippocampal grid cell signal

Science ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 347 (6224) ◽  
pp. 870-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. S. Winter ◽  
B. J. Clark ◽  
J. S. Taube
2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 289-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia E Sharp ◽  
Hugh T Blair ◽  
Jeiwon Cho

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (46) ◽  
pp. 14521-14533 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Muir ◽  
J. E. Brown ◽  
J. P. Carey ◽  
T. P. Hirvonen ◽  
C. C. Della Santina ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (30) ◽  
pp. 9719-9731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey L. Calton ◽  
Robert W. Stackman ◽  
Jeremy P. Goodridge ◽  
William B. Archey ◽  
Paul A. Dudchenko ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noam Almog ◽  
Gilad Tocker ◽  
Tora Bonnevie ◽  
Edvard Moser ◽  
May-Britt Moser ◽  
...  

AbstractThe grid cell network in the MEC has been subject to thorough testing and analysis, and many theories for their formation have been suggested. To test some of these theories we re-analyzed data from Bonnevie et al. (2013), in which the hippocampus was inactivated and grid cells were recorded in the MEC, to investigate whether the firing associations of grid cells depend on hippocampal inputs. Specifically, we examined temporal and spatial correlations in the firing times of simultaneously recorded grid cells before and during hippocampal inactivation. Our analysis revealed evidence of network coherence in grid cells even in the absence of hippocampal input to the MEC, both in regular grid cells and in those that became head-direction cells after hippocampal inactivation. This favors models which suggest that phase relations between grid cells in the MEC are dependent on intrinsic connectivity within the MEC.


2014 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 77-87
Author(s):  
Adam A. Housh ◽  
Laura E. Berkowitz ◽  
Isaac Ybarra ◽  
Esther U. Kim ◽  
Brian R. Lee ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document