Receptive Fields of Opponent Color Units in the Optic Nerve of the Ground Squirrel

Science ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 152 (3725) ◽  
pp. 1095-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Michael
1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1200-1212 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. McCourt ◽  
G. H. Jacobs

Directional units in the optic nerve of the California ground squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi) were studied with respect to their response to diffuse light, preferred directions of motion, tuning for preferred direction, the relationship between spatial and directional tuning characteristics, and receptive-field size and areal summating properties. Directional units in the ground squirrel optic nerve are of the “on-off” type. No purely on or off units were encountered in a sample of 356 directionally selective fibers. The distribution of preferred directions of image motion for 356 units was significantly anisotropic; greater than 50% of the directional units prefer motion in the direction of the superior-nasal visual quadrant. Mean directional bandwidth, measured at half-amplitude response, for 39 units was 88.5 degrees. The distribution of directional bandwidths suggests that two subpopulations of directional units may exist a broadly tuned (106.4 degrees bandwidth) group preferring image motion in the superior-nasal direction, and a narrowly tuned group (59.9 degrees bandwidth) with a uniform distribution of preferred direction. Tuning for direction of motion and for spatial frequency were significantly positively correlated in a sample of 35 directional units. Area-vs.-response measures for directional units show that they possess excitatory discharge centers with a concentric antagonistic surround, plus a larger suppressive surround activated specifically by moving luminance contours, which may be asymmetric. Critical activation areas for directional units, as measured along orthogonal orientations, were highly positively correlated. This suggests that these receptive fields possess the property of linear spatial summation, not of luminance flux, but of areas of moving luminance contours.


1990 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. M. Guthrie ◽  
J. R. Banks

AbstractThe anatomy and physiology of the retinotectal pathway of the perch was investigated using physiological and histological techniques. Massed responses of the optic nerve to single shocks exhibited five distinct peaks. Single-unit responses to shocks indicate two groups of fast fibers correlating well with peaks I and II of the massed response. The flash-evoked response in nerve and tectum has three major phases (PSPI-III), with a marked low-threshold fast component. Patterns of flash-evoked response from single fibers vary, but the responses of fast transient fibers coincide with the timing of PSPI, and longer latency groups with PSPII-III. Units reflexly activated by efferents were also seen, and 12% of units were photically inexcitable.Surprisingly, few fibers responded well to a scanned spot light, unlike tectal cells, and receptive fields were often large (>70 deg). ON/OFF responses, evoked either by whole field or local illumination, were much commoner than pure ON or OFF responses.Effects of electrical stimulation or cautery of the tectum on the flash-evoked response of fiber bundles, via the efferents were marginal, but repetitive stimulation or section of the optic nerve produced clear-cut deficits in the slow components of the flash-evoked response of the nerve. Stimulation of the eighth nerve produced a complex long-latency, large-amplitude response in the optic nerve.The fiber spectrum of the optic nerve taken from electron micrographs revealed the presence of a relatively small group (less than 1%) of thick fibers with diameters between 3 μm and 10 μm that could be correlated with fast responses recorded from the optic nerve, and the remainder with axon diameters down to 0.2 μm providing the slow responses. The distribution of cell-body diameters from sectioned and wholemount material indicated a marked distinction between small and large ganglion cells. The total number of fibers in the nerve was estimated 868,840.


1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
G H Jacobs ◽  
B Blakeslee ◽  
R B Tootell

1980 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald H. Jacobs ◽  
R.B.H. Tootell
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent A. Billock ◽  
Algis J. Vingrys ◽  
P. Ewen King-Smith

AbstractThresholds for psychophysically opposite stimuli—light and dark, or equiluminous red and green, or equiluminous blue and yellow—are usually nearly equal. This color threshold symmetry is sometimes violated in subjects who have optic nerve hypoplasia, a congenital loss of retinal ganglion cells. We describe a subject who has optic nerve hypoplasia, who exhibits large red-green and blue-yellow detection threshold asymmetries for equiluminous spots. Temporal and spatial integration for equiluminous red and green test spots also differed from normal; static perimetric thresholds for equiluminous green, blue, and yellow (but not red) spots lacked the normal “V” shaped minimum at the fovea. These asymmetries may relate to a developmental paucity of some ganglion cell subtypes. Optic nerve hypoplasia may allow the contributions to detection made by individual ganglion cell subtypes to be isolated psychophysically, in analogy to the study of cone spectral sensitivity in dichromats.


1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 572-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. Michael

1. I have recorded with tungsten microelectrodes from single cells in the monkey's visual cortex and have specifically studied those neurons which were sensitive to the color of the stimulus. In the primate striate cortex there are four classes of color-coded cells. The cells described in this paper have concentric receptive fields with one red-green opponent-color system in the field center and the opposite organization in the surround. These dual-opponent cells were nost sensitive to the simultaneous presentation of two different colors, one covering the field center and the other illuminating the surround. They are probable involved in the perception of simultaneous color-contrast phenomena. 2. Spectral sensitivity curves revealed that both the field centers and the surrounds received opposite types of inputs from red-sensitive and green-sensitive cones. None of the cells tested had inputs from rods. 3. Area-sensitivity curves showed that peripheral suppression was present for both phases of the center opponent-color system. The boundary between the center and the surround was the same for both sets of opponent systems. Some cells had "silent" surrounds, which did not respond to annular stimuli. 4. Multiple-unit recordings from a concentric cell and one of its presumed afferents yielded information regarding its possible synaptic inputs. In some cases the cells appeared to receive contacts from red/green opponent-color geniculated fibers with circular receptive fields that lacked an antagonistic surround (similar to Wiesel and Hubel's (37) type II class). In other instances the afferents had on-center, off surround receptive fields or the reverse, but received inputs from only one cone type, either red or green (similar to Wiesel and Hubel's type III class). 5. Concentric cells were always driven by only one eye. 6. The laminar distribution of these cells was limited almost entirely to layer IV and its subdivisions. 7. The cumulative evidence presented in this paper indicates that the concentric cells probably received direct geniculate inputs and, therefore, they are the first cortical stage in the integration of color-contrast information.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document