scholarly journals Cell-autonomous clock of astrocytes drives circadian behavior in mammals

Science ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 363 (6423) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Brancaccio ◽  
Mathew D. Edwards ◽  
Andrew P. Patton ◽  
Nicola J. Smyllie ◽  
Johanna E. Chesham ◽  
...  

Circadian (~24-hour) rhythms depend on intracellular transcription-translation negative feedback loops (TTFLs). How these self-sustained cellular clocks achieve multicellular integration and thereby direct daily rhythms of behavior in animals is largely obscure. The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the fulcrum of this pathway from gene to cell to circuit to behavior in mammals. We describe cell type–specific, functionally distinct TTFLs in neurons and astrocytes of the SCN and show that, in the absence of other cellular clocks, the cell-autonomous astrocytic TTFL alone can drive molecular oscillations in the SCN and circadian behavior in mice. Astrocytic clocks achieve this by reinstating clock gene expression and circadian function of SCN neurons via glutamatergic signals. Our results demonstrate that astrocytes can autonomously initiate and sustain complex mammalian behavior.

eNeuro ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. ENEURO.0377-16.2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey O. Hermanstyne ◽  
Daniel Granados-Fuentes ◽  
Rebecca L. Mellor ◽  
Erik D. Herzog ◽  
Jeanne M. Nerbonne

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol preprint (2007) ◽  
pp. e33
Author(s):  
Hee-Kyung Hong ◽  
Jason L. Chong ◽  
Weimin Song ◽  
Eun Joo Song ◽  
Amira A. Jyawook ◽  
...  

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee-Kyung Hong ◽  
Jason L Chong ◽  
Weimin Song ◽  
Eun Joo Song ◽  
Amira A Jyawook ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. e53
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Enoki ◽  
Shigeru Kuroda ◽  
Daisuke Ono ◽  
Tetsuo Ueda ◽  
Hasan Mazhir ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 66 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 104-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Abe ◽  
Sato Honma ◽  
Masakazu Namihira ◽  
Yusuke Tanahashi ◽  
Masaaki Ikeda ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (13) ◽  
pp. 3657-3662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola J. Smyllie ◽  
Johanna E. Chesham ◽  
Ryan Hamnett ◽  
Elizabeth S. Maywood ◽  
Michael H. Hastings

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the master circadian clock controlling daily behavior in mammals. It consists of a heterogeneous network of neurons, in which cell-autonomous molecular feedback loops determine the period and amplitude of circadian oscillations of individual cells. In contrast, circuit-level properties of coherence, synchrony, and ensemble period are determined by intercellular signals and are embodied in a circadian wave of gene expression that progresses daily across the SCN. How cell-autonomous and circuit-level mechanisms interact in timekeeping is poorly understood. To explore this interaction, we used intersectional genetics to create temporally chimeric mice with SCN containing dopamine 1a receptor (Drd1a) cells with an intrinsic period of 24 h alongside non-Drd1a cells with 20-h clocks. Recording of circadian behavior in vivo alongside cellular molecular pacemaking in SCN slices in vitro demonstrated that such chimeric circuits form robust and resilient circadian clocks. It also showed that the computation of ensemble period is nonlinear. Moreover, the chimeric circuit sustained a wave of gene expression comparable to that of nonchimeric SCN, demonstrating that this circuit-level property is independent of differences in cell-intrinsic periods. The relative dominance of 24-h Drd1a and 20-h non-Drd1a neurons in setting ensemble period could be switched by exposure to resonant or nonresonant 24-h or 20-h lighting cycles. The chimeric circuit therefore reveals unanticipated principles of circuit-level operation underlying the emergent plasticity, resilience, and robustness of the SCN clock. The spontaneous and light-driven flexibility of period observed in chimeric mice provides a new perspective on the concept of SCN pacemaker cells.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Schlichting ◽  
MM Diaz ◽  
J Xin ◽  
M Rosbash

AbstractAnimal circadian rhythms persist in constant darkness and are driven by intracellular transcription-translation feedback loops. Although these cellular oscillators communicate, isolated mammalian cellular clocks continue to tick away in darkness without intercellular communication. To investigate these issues in Drosophila, we assayed behavior as well as molecular rhythms within individual brain clock neurons while blocking communication within the ca. 150 neuron clock network. We also generated CRISPR-mediated neuron-specific circadian clock knockouts. The results point to two key clock neuron groups: loss of the clock within both regions but neither one alone has a strong behavioral phenotype in darkness; communication between these regions also contributes to circadian period determination. Under these dark conditions, the clock within one region persists without network communication. The clock within the famous PDF-expressing s-LNv neurons however was strongly dependent on network communication, likely because clock gene expression within these vulnerable sLNvs depends on neuronal firing or light.


2003 ◽  
Vol 2003 (Spring) ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Karolczak ◽  
Guido J. Burbach ◽  
Horst-Werner Korf ◽  
Jörg H. Stehle

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document