Plant community-level mapping of arctic Alaska based on the Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 821-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha K. Raynolds ◽  
Donald A. Walker ◽  
Hilmar A. Maier
2019 ◽  
Vol 232 ◽  
pp. 111297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha K. Raynolds ◽  
Donald A. Walker ◽  
Andrew Balser ◽  
Christian Bay ◽  
Mitch Campbell ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 267-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Walker ◽  
Martha K. Raynolds ◽  
Fred J.A. Daniëls ◽  
Eythor Einarsson ◽  
Arve Elvebakk ◽  
...  

Oecologia ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 168 (4) ◽  
pp. 1091-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia C. Chang ◽  
Melinda D. Smith

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Barry ◽  
Stefan A. Schnitzer

AbstractOne of the central goals of ecology is to determine the mechanisms that enable coexistence among species. Evidence is accruing that conspecific negative density dependence (CNDD), the process by which plant seedlings are unable to survive in the area surrounding adults of their same species, is a major contributor to tree species coexistence. However, for CNDD to maintain diversity, three conditions must be met. First, CNDD must maintain diversity for the majority of the woody plant community (rather than merely specific groups). Second, the pattern of repelled recruitment must increase in with plant size. Third, CNDD must occurs across life history strategies and not be restricted to a single life history strategy. These three conditions are rarely tested simultaneously. In this study, we simultaneously test all three conditions in a woody plant community in a North American temperate forest. We examined whether the different woody plant growth forms (shrubs, understory trees, mid-story trees, canopy trees, and lianas) at different ontogenetic stages (seedling, sapling, and adult) were overdispersed – a spatial pattern indicative of CNDD – using spatial point pattern analysis across life history stages and strategies. We found that there was a strong signal of overdispersal at the community level. However, this pattern was driven by adult canopy trees. By contrast, understory plants, which can constitute up to 80% of temperate forest plant diversity, were not overdispersed as adults. The lack of overdispersal suggests that CNDD is unlikely to be a major mechanism maintaining understory plant diversity. The focus on trees for the vast majority of CNDD studies may have biased the perception of the prevalence of CNDD as a dominant mechanism that maintains community-level diversity when, according to our data, CNDD may be restricted largely to trees.


1985 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Fishman ◽  
H. Talpaz ◽  
R. Winograd ◽  
M. Dinar ◽  
Y. Arazi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald A. Walker ◽  
Fred J.A. Daniëls ◽  
Nadezhda V. Matveyeva ◽  
Jozef Šibík ◽  
Marilyn D. Walker ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 124-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. V. Matveyeva ◽  
I. A. Lavrinenko ◽  
O. V. Lavrinenko

The two-day Arctic Vegetation Archive and Classification Workshop, in which twenty-nine individuals (two in absentia) from 9 countries (EU: Czech Republic, Germany, Norway, Slovak Republic, Switzerland, The Netherlands; Russia, USA, Canada) participated, took place at the Czech Academy of Science Building, Prague, Czech Republic, on 30–31 April 2017. An Arctic Vegetation Archive (AVA) is essential for deve­loping an Arctic Vegetation Classification (AVC) and is needed for a variety of international Arctic initiatives that involve Arctic vegetation information. The AVA will gather vegetation and environmental data from approximately 31 000 legacy vegetation plots into a standardized format for vegetation classification and analysis. The primary goal is to develop a stra­tegy for each country to assemble its own archive with common protocols that will later allow the databases to be united into a single AVA using TurboVeg v3 and then use JUICE software to create a Pan Arctic vegetation classification. Several overview and keynote talks set the stage. We reviewed the datasets and plots that are available for each of the floristic provinces in each circumpolar country. Discussions focused on the exchange of data between different database approaches, reflections on the realization of a pan-Arctic vegetation classification, steps still needed to achieve the AVC. At the end of the meeting, the assembled members resolved to accomplish the following within 5 years: – develop a checklist of existing described Arctic vegetation habitat and vegetation types (an Arctic prodromus) according the European Vegetation Classification approach. – develop and use standardized plot-data collection and archiving methods modeled after the European Vegetation Archive and the Alaska Arctic Vegetation Archive. – modify the existing vector-based Circumpolar Arctic Vegetation Map to a raster-based format with 12.5-km resolution, and incorporate modifications based on new knowledge. – work with the Arctic Data Center (ADC) to develop data-sharing methods and rules for Arctic ve­getation data. – contribute to training a new generation of young professional Arctic botanists and vegetation scientists through international field courses at the University of the Arctic and the Association of Polar Early Career Scientists (APECS). There was understanding of the necessity to deve­lop a funding strategy to secure funds for completing the AVA and AVC. Finally we resolved to meet again at Arctic Science Summit Week 2019 in Arkhangelsk, Russia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document