Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Regimens of Eravacycline versus Ertapenem for Adult Community-Acquired Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections

ABSTRACTEravacycline is a novel fluorocycline, highly active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogensin vitro, including those with tetracycline and multidrug resistance. This phase 2, randomized, double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dose regimens of eravacycline compared with ertapenem in adult hospitalized patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs). Patients with confirmed cIAI requiring surgical or percutaneous intervention and antibacterial therapy were randomized (2:2:1) to receive eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg of body weight every 24 h (q24h), eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg every 12 h (q12h), or ertapenem at 1 g (q24h) for a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical response in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit 10 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug therapy. Overall, 53 patients received eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg q24h, 56 received eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg q12h, and 30 received ertapenem. For the ME population, the clinical success rate at the TOC visit was 92.9% (39/42) in the group receiving eravacycline at 1.5 mg/kg q24h, 100% (41/41) in the group receiving eravacycline at 1.0 mg/kg q12h, and 92.3% (24/26) in the ertapenem group. The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were 35.8%, 28.6%, and 26.7%, respectively. Incidence rates of nausea and vomiting were low in both eravacycline groups. Both dose regimens of eravacycline were as efficacious as the comparator, ertapenem, in patients with cIAI and were well tolerated. These results support the continued development of eravacycline for the treatment of serious infections, including those caused by drug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01265784.)

Download Full-text

ORION: A Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study to assess efficacy and safety of durvalumab+olaparib vs durvalumab alone as maintenance therapy in Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps9126 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS9126-TPS9126

Author(s):

Myung-Ju Ahn ◽

Yufan Liu ◽

Teresa Improta ◽

Michelle Marcovitz ◽

Kate DiPiazza ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Stage Iv ◽

Initial Therapy ◽

Blind Study ◽

Double Blind Study ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Double Blind ◽

Metastatic Nsclc ◽

Recist 1.1

TPS9126 Background: Systemic chemotherapy for first-line (1L) metastatic NSCLC shows mixed outcomes. Results from studies using immunotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy as 1L treatment in patients (pts) with metastatic NSCLC represent a substantial advance, but further improvement is needed. Increased DNA damage triggered by polyadenosine 5’diphosphoribose polymerase inhibition may confer antitumor activity, modify tumor immunogenicity, and further sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibition, thus promoting a more durable antitumor response. This Phase 2, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study (NCT03775486) is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab + olaparib vs durvalumab alone as maintenance therapy in pts whose Stage IV NSCLC has not progressed following 1L platinum-based chemotherapy + durvalumab. Methods: Adult pts with Stage IV NSCLC with tumors lacking activating EGFR mutations and ALK fusions are eligible. In the initial therapy phase, all pts will receive durvalumab (1500 mg IV) concurrent with platinum-based doublet therapy. Durvalumab + chemotherapy will be administered for 4 cycles for both squamous NSCLC (nanoparticle albumin-bound [nab]-paclitaxel + carboplatin or gemcitabine + carboplatin/cisplatin) and nonsquamous NSCLC (nab-paclitaxel + carboplatin or pemetrexed + carboplatin/cisplatin). Pts whose disease does not progress (complete or partial response [CR/PR] or stable disease [SD]; investigator-assessed RECIST 1.1) will be randomized (1:1) to durvalumab (1500 mg IV, every 4 weeks) + either olaparib (300 mg, oral, BID) or its matching placebo until disease progression. Randomization will be stratified based on objective response to durvalumab + chemotherapy (CR/PR or SD) during the initial therapy phase and histology (squamous or nonsquamous). The primary endpoint is PFS (investigator-assessed, RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints are OS, PFS in pts with homologous recombination repair related gene mutation, ORR, duration of response, HRQoL, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of durvalumab, and safety. Pt enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03775486.

Download Full-text