scholarly journals Induced Expression of the Legionella pneumophila Gene Encoding a 20-Kilodalton Protein during Intracellular Infection

1998 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousef Abu Kwaik

ABSTRACT The eukaryotic protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximid has been used by many investigators to selectively radiolabel intracellular bacteria. Although cycloheximide has no direct effect on bacterial gene expression, there are concerns that long-term inhibition of the host cell protein synthesis may have secondary effects on bacterial gene expression. Therefore, prior to further identification and cloning of the macrophage-induced (MI) genes of Legionella pneumophila, the effects of cycloheximide on L. pneumophila-infected U937 cells were evaluated by transmission electron microscopy. Inhibition of protein synthesis of the host cell for 6 h had no major effect on the ultrastructure of the host cell, on the formation of rough endoplasmic reticulum-surrounded replicative phagosome, or on initiation of intracellular bacterial replication. In contrast, by 15 h of cycloheximide treatment, there was profound deterioration in the host cell as well as in the phagosome. To examine protein synthesis by L. pneumophila during the intracellular infection, U937 macrophage-like cells were infected with L. pneumophila, and intracellular bacteria were radiolabeled during a 2-h cycloheximide treatment or following 12 h of cycloheximide treatment. Comparison by two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the protein profile of radiolabeled in vitro-grown L. pneumophila to that of intracellularly radiolabeled bacteria showed that 23 proteins were induced in response to the intracellular environment during 2 h of inhibition of host cell protein biosynthesis. Twelve MI proteins ofL. pneumophila were artifactually induced due to prolonged inhibition of the host cell protein synthesis. The gene encoding a 20-kDa MI protein was cloned by a reverse genetics technique. Sequence analysis showed that the cloned gene encoded a protein that was 80% similar to the enzyme inorganic pyrophosphatase. Studies of promoter fusion to a promoterless lacZ gene showed that compared to in vitro-grown bacteria, expression of the pyrophosphatase gene (ppa) was induced fourfold throughout the intracellular infection. There was no detectable induction in transcription of the ppa promoter during exposure to stress stimuli in vitro. The ppa gene of L. pneumophila is the first example of a regulated ppagene which is selectively induced during intracellular infection and which may reflect enhanced capabilities of macromolecular biosynthesis by intracellular L. pneumophila. The data indicate caution in the long-term use of inhibition of host cell protein synthesis to selectively examine gene expression by intracellular bacteria.

1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 803-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Lemay

This short review focuses on the mechanisms involved in transcription and translation in mouse L cells infected with reoviruses. The viral genomic RNA (double-stranded), retained in the inner capsid following removal of the outer capsid of the infecting virion, is transcribed by a viral polymerase. The synthesized viral mRNA is blocked at the 5′ end by a cap structure similar to the cap structure of cellular mRNA but synthesized by the viral enzymes of the inner capsid. This viral mRNA is also used as the first strand and template for the synthesis of the second strand of viral genomic RNA; the newly replicated genome is retained in an inner capsid structure to generate the progeny subviral particles. These particles are active at the transcriptional level but do not synthesize the cap, owing to the absence of the guanylyltransferase activity involved in the formation of this structure. The uncapped mRNA, or late viral mRNA, constitutes the bulk part of viral mRNA. The transcription of the viral genome is finally arrested upon addition of outer capsid proteins to obtain a mature virion. During viral multiplication, there is a gradual inhibition of host-cell protein synthesis, concomitant with stimulation of late viral mRNA translation. The two phenomena are apparently distinct. Furthermore, the inhibition of host-cell protein synthesis has been shown to be dispensable for normal virus multiplication; however, it might accelerate it. The mechanisms responsible for inhibition are still unclear but might involve modifications in the activity of cellular cap-binding proteins. This last point suggests an analogy with poliovirus infection; the two systems are thus briefly compared. Possible significance of the absence of a poly(A) tract at the 3′ end of reovirus mRNA, in contrast to the occurrence of such a sequence at the end of cellular mRNA, is also examined. Different models involving cap discrimination, competition between mRNAs, or alteration of cell membrane permeability have been proposed to explain the events observed at the translational level in reovirus-infected cells. These different models are compared. Finally, recent data implicating the viral sigma 3 capsid protein in efficient translation of late viral mRNA are discussed.


Nature ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 275 (5677) ◽  
pp. 240-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
CORRADO BAGLIONI ◽  
MARCELLA SIMILI ◽  
DAVID A. SHAFRITZ

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document