scholarly journals Exonuclease III (XthA) EnforcesIn VivoDNA Cloning ofEscherichia coliTo Create Cohesive Ends

2018 ◽  
Vol 201 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Nozaki ◽  
Hironori Niki

ABSTRACTEscherichia colihas an ability to assemble DNA fragments with homologous overlapping sequences of 15 to 40 bp at each end. Several modified protocols have already been reported to improve this simple and useful DNA cloning technology. However, the molecular mechanism by whichE. coliaccomplishes such cloning is still unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that thein vivocloning ofE. coliis independent of both RecA and RecET recombinases but is dependent on XthA, a 3′ to 5′ exonuclease. Here,in vivocloning ofE. coliby XthA is referred to asin vivoE. colicloning (iVEC). We also show that iVEC activity is reduced by deletion of the C-terminal domain of DNA polymerase I (PolA). Collectively, these results suggest the following mechanism of iVEC. First, XthA resects the 3′ ends of linear DNA fragments that are introduced intoE. colicells, resulting in exposure of the single-stranded 5′ overhangs. Then, the complementary single-stranded DNA ends hybridize each other, and gaps are filled by DNA polymerase I. Elucidation of the iVEC mechanism at the molecular level would further advance the development ofin vivoDNA cloning technology. Already we have successfully demonstrated multiple-fragment assembly of up to seven fragments in combination with an effortless transformation procedure using a modified host strain for iVEC.IMPORTANCECloning of a DNA fragment into a vector is one of the fundamental techniques in recombinant DNA technology. Recently, anin vitrorecombination system for DNA cloning was shown to enable the joining of multiple DNA fragments at once. Interestingly,E. colipotentially assembles multiple linear DNA fragments that are introduced into the cell. Improved protocols for thisin vivocloning have realized a high level of usability, comparable to that byin vitrorecombination reactions. However, the mechanism ofin vivocloning is highly controversial. Here, we clarified the fundamental mechanism underlyingin vivocloning and also constructed a strain that was optimized forin vivocloning. Additionally, we streamlined the procedure ofin vivocloning by using a single microcentrifuge tube.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Nozaki ◽  
Hironori Niki

AbstractEscherichia colihas an ability to assemble DNA fragments with homologous overlapping sequences of 15-40 bp at each end. Several modified protocols have already been reported to improve this simple and useful DNA-cloning technology. However, the molecular mechanism by whichE. coliaccomplishes such cloning is still unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that thein vivocloning ofE. coliis independent of both RecA and RecET recombinase, but is dependent on XthA, a 3’ to 5’ exonuclease. Here, in vivocloning ofE. coliby XthA is referred to as iVEC (in vivo E. colicloning). Next, we show that the iVEC activity is reduced by deletion of the C-terminal domain of DNA polymerase I (PolA). Collectively, these results suggest the following mechanism of iVEC. First, XthA resects the 3′ ends of linear DNA fragments that are introduced intoE. colicells, resulting in exposure of the single-stranded 5′ overhangs. Then, the complementary single-stranded DNA ends hybridize each other, and gaps are filled by DNA polymerase I. Elucidation of the iVEC mechanism at the molecular level would further advance the development ofin vivoDNA-cloning technology. Already we have successfully demonstrated multiple-fragment assembly of up to seven fragments in combination with an effortless transformation procedure using a modified host strain for iVEC.ImportanceCloning of a DNA fragment into a vector is one of the fundamental techniques in recombinant DNA technology. Recently,in vitrorecombination of DNA fragments effectively joins multiple DNA fragments in place of the canonical method. Interestingly,E. colican take up linear double-stranded vectors, insert DNA fragments and assemble themin vivo.Thein vivocloning have realized a high level of usability comparable to that byin vitrorecombination reaction, since now it is only necessary to introduce PCR products intoE. colifor thein vivocloning. However, the mechanism ofin vivocloning is highly controversial. Here we clarified the fundamental mechanism underlyingin vivocloning of E. coli and also constructed anE. colistrain that was optimized forin vivocloning.


DNA Repair ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang-Yi Su ◽  
Liang-In Lin ◽  
Steven D. Goodman ◽  
Rong-Syuan Yen ◽  
Cho-Yuan Wu ◽  
...  

1988 ◽  
Vol 253 (3) ◽  
pp. 637-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Muller ◽  
J Martial ◽  
W G Verly

5-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine triphosphate (Br-dUTP) and dTTP are used interchangeably for DNA synthesis in vitro by the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. When DNA containing Br-dUMP instead of dTMP at a few preselected sites is transfected into competent bacteria, no mutation occurs, indicating that in vivo E. coli DNA polymerase always places a dAMP residue in front of any unrepaired Br-dUMP residue. On the other hand, in vitro Br-dUTP can also replace dCTP, but only with difficulty: when dCTP is absent, Br-dUMP can be forced in front of a dGMP residue, but the Klenow polymerase pauses before and after addition of Br-dUMP. Transfection into E. coli of the substituted DNA leads to the expected G→A transitions. These mutations can easily be targeted by using a suitable primer and the correctly chosen mix of deoxynucleoside triphosphates containing Br-dUTP. When Br-dUMP has been placed in front of a dGMP residue, the mutation yield is not 100%, showing a partial repair of the transfected DNA before it is replicated. Advantage can be taken of this partial repair to prepare a set of different mutations within a target region in a single experiment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (28) ◽  
pp. 9542-9550
Author(s):  
Alfredo J. Hernandez ◽  
Seung-Joo Lee ◽  
Seungwoo Chang ◽  
Jaehun A. Lee ◽  
Joseph J. Loparo ◽  
...  

Bacteriophage T7 encodes its own DNA polymerase, the product of gene 5 (gp5). In isolation, gp5 is a DNA polymerase of low processivity. However, gp5 becomes highly processive upon formation of a complex with Escherichia coli thioredoxin, the product of the trxA gene. Expression of a gp5 variant in which aspartate residues in the metal-binding site of the polymerase domain were replaced by alanine is highly toxic to E. coli cells. This toxicity depends on the presence of a functional E. coli trxA allele and T7 RNA polymerase-driven expression but is independent of the exonuclease activity of gp5. In vitro, the purified gp5 variant is devoid of any detectable polymerase activity and inhibited DNA synthesis by the replisomes of E. coli and T7 in the presence of thioredoxin by forming a stable complex with DNA that prevents replication. On the other hand, the highly homologous Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I containing an engineered gp5 thioredoxin-binding domain did not exhibit toxicity. We conclude that gp5 alleles encoding inactive polymerases, in combination with thioredoxin, could be useful as a shutoff mechanism in the design of a bacterial cell-growth system.


2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tissier ◽  
E. G. Frank ◽  
J. P. McDonald ◽  
A. Vaisman ◽  
A. R. Fernàndez deHenestrosa Henestrosa ◽  
...  

The human RAD30B gene has recently been shown to encode a novel DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase i (poli). The role of poli within the cell is presently unknown, and the only clues to its cellular function come from its biochemical characterization in vitro. The aim of this short review is, therefore, to summarize the known enzymic activities of poli and to speculate as to how these biochemical properties might relate to its in vivo function.


1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 929-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Rohde ◽  
Hans-Richard Rackwitz ◽  
Frank Boege ◽  
Heinz L. Sänger

The RNA genome of potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTV) is transcribed in vitro into complementary DNA and RNA by DNA-dependent DNA polymerase I and RNA polymerase, respectively, from Escherichia coli. In vitro synthesis of complementary RNA produces distinct transcripts larger than unit length thus reflecting the in vivo mechanism of viroid replication. The influence of varying experimental conditions on the transcription process is studied; actinomycin D is found to drastically reduce complementary RNA synthesis from the PSTV RNA template by RNA polymerase.


2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin R. Randall ◽  
Taylor M. Nye ◽  
Katherine J. Wozniak ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons

ABSTRACTRNA-DNA hybrids are common in chromosomal DNA. Persistent RNA-DNA hybrids result in replication fork stress, DNA breaks, and neurological disorders in humans. During replication, Okazaki fragment synthesis relies on frequent RNA primer placement, providing one of the most prominent forms of covalent RNA-DNA strandsin vivo. The mechanism of Okazaki fragment maturation, which involves RNA removal and subsequent DNA replacement, in bacteria lacking RNase HI remains unclear. In this work, we reconstituted repair of a linear model Okazaki fragmentin vitrousing purified recombinant enzymes fromBacillus subtilis. We showed that RNase HII and HIII are capable of incision on Okazaki fragmentsin vitroand that both enzymes show mild stimulation by single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB). We also showed that RNase HIII and DNA polymerase I provide the primary pathway for Okazaki fragment maturationin vitro. Furthermore, we found that YpcP is a 5′ to 3′ nuclease that can act on a wide variety of RNA- and DNA-containing substrates and exhibits preference for degrading RNA in model Okazaki fragments. Together, our data showed that RNase HIII and DNA polymerase I provide the primary pathway for Okazaki fragment maturation, whereas YpcP also contributes to the removal of RNA from an Okazaki fragmentin vitro.IMPORTANCEAll cells are required to resolve the different types of RNA-DNA hybrids that formin vivo. When RNA-DNA hybrids persist, cells experience an increase in mutation rate and problems with DNA replication. Okazaki fragment synthesis on the lagging strand requires an RNA primer to begin synthesis of each fragment. The mechanism of RNA removal from Okazaki fragments remains unknown in bacteria that lack RNase HI. We examined Okazaki fragment processingin vitroand found that RNase HIII in conjunction with DNA polymerase I represent the most efficient repair pathway. We also assessed the contribution of YpcP and found that YpcP is a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease that prefers RNA substrates with activity on Okazaki and flap substratesin vitro.


Biochemistry ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 2073-2078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anup K. Hazra ◽  
Sevilla Detera-Wadleigh ◽  
Samuel H. Wilson

Genetics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
L J Reha-Krantz

Abstract Intragenic complementation was detected within the bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase gene. Complementation was observed between specific amino (N)-terminal, temperature-sensitive (ts) mutator mutants and more carboxy (C)-terminal mutants lacking DNA polymerase polymerizing functions. Protein sequences surrounding N-terminal mutation sites are similar to sequences found in Escherichia coli ribonuclease H (RNase H) and in the 5'----3' exonuclease domain of E. coli DNA polymerase I. These observations suggest that T4 DNA polymerase, like E. coli DNA polymerase I, contains a discrete N-terminal domain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document