scholarly journals RNase HIII Is Important for Okazaki Fragment Processing inBacillus subtilis

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin R. Randall ◽  
Taylor M. Nye ◽  
Katherine J. Wozniak ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Okazaki Fragment ◽  
Okazaki Fragments ◽  
Okazaki Fragment Processing ◽  
Rnase Hi ◽  
Okazaki Fragment Maturation ◽  
Polymerase I

ABSTRACTRNA-DNA hybrids are common in chromosomal DNA. Persistent RNA-DNA hybrids result in replication fork stress, DNA breaks, and neurological disorders in humans. During replication, Okazaki fragment synthesis relies on frequent RNA primer placement, providing one of the most prominent forms of covalent RNA-DNA strandsin vivo. The mechanism of Okazaki fragment maturation, which involves RNA removal and subsequent DNA replacement, in bacteria lacking RNase HI remains unclear. In this work, we reconstituted repair of a linear model Okazaki fragmentin vitrousing purified recombinant enzymes fromBacillus subtilis. We showed that RNase HII and HIII are capable of incision on Okazaki fragmentsin vitroand that both enzymes show mild stimulation by single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB). We also showed that RNase HIII and DNA polymerase I provide the primary pathway for Okazaki fragment maturationin vitro. Furthermore, we found that YpcP is a 5′ to 3′ nuclease that can act on a wide variety of RNA- and DNA-containing substrates and exhibits preference for degrading RNA in model Okazaki fragments. Together, our data showed that RNase HIII and DNA polymerase I provide the primary pathway for Okazaki fragment maturation, whereas YpcP also contributes to the removal of RNA from an Okazaki fragmentin vitro.IMPORTANCEAll cells are required to resolve the different types of RNA-DNA hybrids that formin vivo. When RNA-DNA hybrids persist, cells experience an increase in mutation rate and problems with DNA replication. Okazaki fragment synthesis on the lagging strand requires an RNA primer to begin synthesis of each fragment. The mechanism of RNA removal from Okazaki fragments remains unknown in bacteria that lack RNase HI. We examined Okazaki fragment processingin vitroand found that RNase HIII in conjunction with DNA polymerase I represent the most efficient repair pathway. We also assessed the contribution of YpcP and found that YpcP is a 5′ to 3′ exonuclease that prefers RNA substrates with activity on Okazaki and flap substratesin vitro.

DNA polymerase I proofreading exonuclease activity is required for endonuclease V repair pathway both in vitro and in vivo

DNA Repair ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 59-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang-Yi Su ◽  
Liang-In Lin ◽  
Steven D. Goodman ◽  
Rong-Syuan Yen ◽  
Cho-Yuan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Exonuclease Activity ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Endonuclease V ◽  
Polymerase I

Biochemical characterization of human DNA polymerase i provides clues to its biological function

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Tissier ◽  
E. G. Frank ◽  
J. P. McDonald ◽  
A. Vaisman ◽  
A. R. Fernàndez deHenestrosa Henestrosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Biochemical Properties ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Polymerase I

The human RAD30B gene has recently been shown to encode a novel DNA polymerase, DNA polymerase i (poli). The role of poli within the cell is presently unknown, and the only clues to its cellular function come from its biochemical characterization in vitro. The aim of this short review is, therefore, to summarize the known enzymic activities of poli and to speculate as to how these biochemical properties might relate to its in vivo function.

Viroid RNA is accepted as a template for in vitro transcription by DNA-dependent DNA polymerase I and RNA polymerase from Escherichia coli

1982 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 929-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Rohde ◽  
Hans-Richard Rackwitz ◽  
Frank Boege ◽  
Heinz L. Sänger
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
In Vitro Synthesis ◽  
Polymerase I

The RNA genome of potato spindle tuber viroid (PSTV) is transcribed in vitro into complementary DNA and RNA by DNA-dependent DNA polymerase I and RNA polymerase, respectively, from Escherichia coli. In vitro synthesis of complementary RNA produces distinct transcripts larger than unit length thus reflecting the in vivo mechanism of viroid replication. The influence of varying experimental conditions on the transcription process is studied; actinomycin D is found to drastically reduce complementary RNA synthesis from the PSTV RNA template by RNA polymerase.

scholarly journals Escherichia coli β-clamp slows down DNA polymerase I dependent nick translation while accelerating ligation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Bhardwaj ◽  
Debarghya Ghose ◽  
Krishan Gopal Thakur ◽  
Dipak Dutta
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Nick Translation ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Okazaki Fragments ◽  
Pol I ◽  
Dna Strands ◽  
Translation Property ◽  
Polymerase I

AbstractThe nick translation property of DNA polymerase I (Pol I) ensures the maturation of Okazaki fragments by removing primer RNAs and facilitating ligation. However, prolonged nick translation traversing downstream DNA is an energy wasting futile process, as Pol I simultaneously polymerizes and depolymerizes at the nick sites utilizing energy-rich dNTPs. Using an in vitro assay system, we demonstrate that the β-clamp of the Escherichia coli replisome strongly inhibits nick translation on the DNA substrate. To do so, β-clamp inhibits the strand displacement activity of Pol I by interfering with the interaction between the finger subdomain of Pol I and the downstream primer-template junction. Conversely, β-clamp stimulates the 5’ exonuclease property of Pol I to cleave single nucleotides or shorter oligonucleotide flaps. This single nucleotide flap removal at high frequency increases the probability of ligation between the upstream and downstream DNA strands at an early phase, terminating nick translation. Besides β-clamp-mediated ligation helps DNA ligase to seal the nick promptly during the maturation of Okazaki fragments.

scholarly journals Exonuclease III (XthA) EnforcesIn VivoDNA Cloning ofEscherichia coliTo Create Cohesive Ends

2018 ◽  
Vol 201 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Nozaki ◽  
Hironori Niki
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Fragments ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Dna Cloning ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Cloning Technology

ABSTRACTEscherichia colihas an ability to assemble DNA fragments with homologous overlapping sequences of 15 to 40 bp at each end. Several modified protocols have already been reported to improve this simple and useful DNA cloning technology. However, the molecular mechanism by whichE. coliaccomplishes such cloning is still unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that thein vivocloning ofE. coliis independent of both RecA and RecET recombinases but is dependent on XthA, a 3′ to 5′ exonuclease. Here,in vivocloning ofE. coliby XthA is referred to asin vivoE. colicloning (iVEC). We also show that iVEC activity is reduced by deletion of the C-terminal domain of DNA polymerase I (PolA). Collectively, these results suggest the following mechanism of iVEC. First, XthA resects the 3′ ends of linear DNA fragments that are introduced intoE. colicells, resulting in exposure of the single-stranded 5′ overhangs. Then, the complementary single-stranded DNA ends hybridize each other, and gaps are filled by DNA polymerase I. Elucidation of the iVEC mechanism at the molecular level would further advance the development ofin vivoDNA cloning technology. Already we have successfully demonstrated multiple-fragment assembly of up to seven fragments in combination with an effortless transformation procedure using a modified host strain for iVEC.IMPORTANCECloning of a DNA fragment into a vector is one of the fundamental techniques in recombinant DNA technology. Recently, anin vitrorecombination system for DNA cloning was shown to enable the joining of multiple DNA fragments at once. Interestingly,E. colipotentially assembles multiple linear DNA fragments that are introduced into the cell. Improved protocols for thisin vivocloning have realized a high level of usability, comparable to that byin vitrorecombination reactions. However, the mechanism ofin vivocloning is highly controversial. Here, we clarified the fundamental mechanism underlyingin vivocloning and also constructed a strain that was optimized forin vivocloning. Additionally, we streamlined the procedure ofin vivocloning by using a single microcentrifuge tube.

scholarly journals The GAN Exonuclease or the Flap Endonuclease Fen1 and RNase HII Are Necessary for Viability of Thermococcus kodakarensis

2017 ◽  
Vol 199 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett W. Burkhart ◽  
Lubomira Cubonova ◽  
Margaret R. Heider ◽  
Zvi Kelman ◽  
John N. Reeve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Okazaki Fragment ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Thermococcus Kodakarensis ◽  
Okazaki Fragments ◽  
Domains Of Life ◽  
Okazaki Fragment Maturation ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Lagging Strand

ABSTRACT Many aspects of and factors required for DNA replication are conserved across all three domains of life, but there are some significant differences surrounding lagging-strand synthesis. In Archaea, a 5′-to-3′ exonuclease, related to both bacterial RecJ and eukaryotic Cdc45, that associates with the replisome specifically through interactions with GINS was identified and designated GAN (for GINS-associated nuclease). Despite the presence of a well-characterized flap endonuclease (Fen1), it was hypothesized that GAN might participate in primer removal during Okazaki fragment maturation, and as a Cdc45 homologue, GAN might also be a structural component of an archaeal CMG (Cdc45, MCM, and GINS) replication complex. We demonstrate here that, individually, either Fen1 or GAN can be deleted, with no discernible effects on viability and growth. However, deletion of both Fen1 and GAN was not possible, consistent with both enzymes catalyzing the same step in primer removal from Okazaki fragments in vivo. RNase HII has also been proposed to participate in primer processing during Okazaki fragment maturation. Strains with both Fen1 and RNase HII deleted grew well. GAN activity is therefore sufficient for viability in the absence of both RNase HII and Fen1, but it was not possible to construct a strain with both RNase HII and GAN deleted. Fen1 alone is therefore insufficient for viability in the absence of both RNase HII and GAN. The ability to delete GAN demonstrates that GAN is not required for the activation or stability of the archaeal MCM replicative helicase. IMPORTANCE The mechanisms used to remove primer sequences from Okazaki fragments during lagging-strand DNA replication differ in the biological domains. Bacteria use the exonuclease activity of DNA polymerase I, whereas eukaryotes and archaea encode a flap endonuclease (Fen1) that cleaves displaced primer sequences. RNase HII and the GINS-associated exonuclease GAN have also been hypothesized to assist in primer removal in Archaea. Here we demonstrate that in Thermococcus kodakarensis, either Fen1 or GAN activity is sufficient for viability. Furthermore, GAN can support growth in the absence of both Fen1 and RNase HII, but Fen1 and RNase HII are required for viability in the absence of GAN.

scholarly journals Exonuclease III (XthA) enforcesin vivoDNA cloning ofEscherichia colito create cohesive ends

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Nozaki ◽  
Hironori Niki
Keyword(s):  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Recombination Reaction ◽  
Dna Fragments ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Dna Cloning ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Polymerase I ◽  
Cloning Technology

AbstractEscherichia colihas an ability to assemble DNA fragments with homologous overlapping sequences of 15-40 bp at each end. Several modified protocols have already been reported to improve this simple and useful DNA-cloning technology. However, the molecular mechanism by whichE. coliaccomplishes such cloning is still unknown. In this study, we provide evidence that thein vivocloning ofE. coliis independent of both RecA and RecET recombinase, but is dependent on XthA, a 3’ to 5’ exonuclease. Here, in vivocloning ofE. coliby XthA is referred to as iVEC (in vivo E. colicloning). Next, we show that the iVEC activity is reduced by deletion of the C-terminal domain of DNA polymerase I (PolA). Collectively, these results suggest the following mechanism of iVEC. First, XthA resects the 3′ ends of linear DNA fragments that are introduced intoE. colicells, resulting in exposure of the single-stranded 5′ overhangs. Then, the complementary single-stranded DNA ends hybridize each other, and gaps are filled by DNA polymerase I. Elucidation of the iVEC mechanism at the molecular level would further advance the development ofin vivoDNA-cloning technology. Already we have successfully demonstrated multiple-fragment assembly of up to seven fragments in combination with an effortless transformation procedure using a modified host strain for iVEC.ImportanceCloning of a DNA fragment into a vector is one of the fundamental techniques in recombinant DNA technology. Recently,in vitrorecombination of DNA fragments effectively joins multiple DNA fragments in place of the canonical method. Interestingly,E. colican take up linear double-stranded vectors, insert DNA fragments and assemble themin vivo.Thein vivocloning have realized a high level of usability comparable to that byin vitrorecombination reaction, since now it is only necessary to introduce PCR products intoE. colifor thein vivocloning. However, the mechanism ofin vivocloning is highly controversial. Here we clarified the fundamental mechanism underlyingin vivocloning of E. coli and also constructed anE. colistrain that was optimized forin vivocloning.

Mechanism of initiation of in vitro DNA synthesis by the immunopurified complex between yeast DNA polymerase I and DNA primase

1986 ◽  
Vol 161 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfranco BADARACCO ◽  
Paola VALSASNINI ◽  
Marco FOIANI ◽  
Roberta BENFANTE ◽  
Giovanna LUCCHINI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Polymerase I ◽  
Dna Primase ◽  
Polymerase I
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document