scholarly journals Novel Mutations in gB and gH Circumvent the Requirement for Known gD Receptors in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Entry and Cell-to-Cell Spread

2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1430-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Uchida ◽  
Janet Chan ◽  
Indira Shrivastava ◽  
Bonnie Reinhart ◽  
Paola Grandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Virus Entry ◽  
Virus Spread ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Limited Entry ◽  
Experimental Findings ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Cell Spread ◽  
Primary Virus

ABSTRACTBoth entry and cell-to-cell spread of herpes simplex virus (HSV) involve a cascade of cooperative interactions among the essential glycoproteins D, B, and H/L (gD, gB, and gH/gL, respectively) initiated by the binding of gD to a cognate HSV entry receptor. We previously reported that a variant (D285N/A549T) of glycoprotein B (gB:NT) enabled primary virus entry into cells that were devoid of typical HSV entry receptors. Here, we compared the activities of the gB:NT variant with those of a newly selected variant of glycoprotein H (gH:KV) and a frequently coselected gB variant (gB:S668N). In combination, gH:KV and gB:S668N enabled primary virus entry into cells that lacked established HSV entry receptors as efficiently as did gB:NT, but separately, each variant enabled only limited entry. Remarkably, gH:KV uniquely facilitated secondary virus spread between cells that lacked canonical entry receptors. Transient expression of the four essential entry glycoproteins revealed that gH:KV, but not gB:NT, induced fusion between cells lacking the standard receptors. Because the involvement of gD remained essential for virus spread and cell fusion, we propose that gH:KV mimics a transition state of gH that responds efficiently to weak signals from gD to reach the active state. Computational modeling of the structures of wild-type gH and gH:KV revealed relatively subtle differences that may have accounted for our experimental findings. Our study shows that (i) the dependence of HSV-1 entry and spread on specific gD receptors can be reduced by sequence changes in the downstream effectors gB and gH, and (ii) the relative roles of gB and gH are different in entry and spread.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus gE/gI Must Accumulate in the trans-Golgi Network at Early Times and Then Redistribute to Cell Junctions To Promote Cell-Cell Spread

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 3167-3179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Farnsworth ◽  
David C. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Cell Junctions ◽  
Virus Spread ◽  
Neuronal Tissues ◽  
Mediate Cell ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Golgi Network ◽  
Cell Spread ◽  
Cell Cell

ABSTRACT Herpes simplex virus (HSV) glycoprotein heterodimer gE/gI is necessary for virus spread in epithelial and neuronal tissues. Deletion of the relatively large gE cytoplasmic (CT) domain abrogates the ability of gE/gI to mediate HSV spread. The gE CT domain is required for the sorting of gE/gI to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) in early stages of virus infection, and there are several recognizable TGN sorting motifs grouped near the center of this domain. Late in HSV infection, gE/gI, other viral glycoproteins, and enveloped virions redistribute from the TGN to epithelial cell junctions, and the gE CT domain is also required for this process. Without the gE CT domain, newly enveloped virions are directed to apical surfaces instead of to cell junctions. We hypothesized that the gE CT domain promotes virus envelopment into TGN subdomains from which nascent enveloped virions are sorted to cell junctions, a process that enhances cell-to-cell spread. To characterize elements of the gE CT domain involved in intracellular trafficking and cell-to-cell spread, we constructed a panel of truncation mutants. Specifically, these mutants were used to address whether sorting to the TGN and redistribution to cell junctions are necessary, and sufficient, for gE/gI to promote cell-to-cell spread. gE-519, lacking 32 C-terminal residues, localized normally to the TGN early in infection and then trafficked to cell junctions at late times and mediated virus spread. By contrast, mutants gE-495 (lacking 56 C-terminal residues) and gE-470 (lacking 81 residues) accumulated in the TGN but did not traffic to cell junctions and did not mediate cell-to-cell spread. A fourth mutant, gE-448 (lacking most of the CT domain), did not localize to cell junctions and did not mediate virus spread. Therefore, the capacity of gE/gI to promote cell-cell spread requires early localization to the TGN, but this is not sufficient for virus spread. Additionally, gE CT sequences between residues 495 and 519, which contain no obvious cell sorting motifs, are required to promote gE/gI traffic to cell junctions and cell-to-cell spread.

scholarly journals PREVENTION OF CELL-TO-CELL SPREAD OF HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS BY LEUKOCYTES

1973 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
pp. 706-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Louis Lodmell ◽  
Akira Niwa ◽  
Kozaburo Hayashi ◽  
Abner Louis Notkins
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Virus Spread ◽  
Viral Antigens ◽  
Antiviral Antibody ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Immunological Destruction ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Cell Spread

Antibody to herpes simplex virus (HSV) plus complement destroyed HSV-infected cells but did not stop the spread of the infection. Studies on the relationship between the time of appearance of viral antigens on the cell surface, immunological destruction of the cells by antiviral antibody and complement, and transfer of the virus to adjacent cells showed that the virus spread from infected to uninfected cells before the infected cells were susceptible to immunological destruction. Incubation of infected monolayers with leukocytes, however, stopped the spread of the virus by nonspecifically damaging both infected and uninfected cells and by presumably breaking intercellular bridges. When leukocytes were removed from infected monolayers, viral plaques developed. If, however, antiviral antibody and complement were added to monolayers before the leukocytes were removed, the development of plaques was prevented. These findings suggest that both antibody and leukocytes are needed to cure HSV infections.

scholarly journals Cell-to-Cell Spread Blocking Activity Is Extremely Limited in the Sera of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 (HSV-1)- and HSV-2-Infected Subjects

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Criscuolo ◽  
Matteo Castelli ◽  
Roberta A. Diotti ◽  
Virginia Amato ◽  
Roberto Burioni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Humoral Immunity ◽  
Virus Entry ◽  
Serum Antibody ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACTHerpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and HSV-2 can evade serum antibody-mediated neutralization through cell-to-cell transmission mechanisms, which represent one of the central steps in disease reactivation. To address the role of humoral immunity in controlling HSV-1 and HSV-2 replication, we analyzed serum samples from 44 HSV-1 and HSV-2 seropositive subjects by evaluating (i) their efficiency in binding both the purified viral particles and recombinant gD and gB viral glycoproteins, (ii) their neutralizing activity, and (iii) their capacity to inhibit the cell-to-cell virus passagein vitro. All of the sera were capable of binding gD, gB, and whole virions, and all sera significantly neutralized cell-free virus. However, neither whole sera nor purified serum IgG fraction was able to inhibit significantly cell-to-cell virus spreading inin vitropost-virus-entry infectious assays. Conversely, when spiked with an already described anti-gD human monoclonal neutralizing antibody capable of inhibiting HSV-1 and -2 cell-to-cell transmission, each serum boosted both its neutralizing and post-virus-entry inhibitory activity, with no interference exerted by serum antibody subpopulations.IMPORTANCEDespite its importance in the physiopathology of HSV-1 and -2 infections, the cell-to-cell spreading mechanism is still poorly understood. The data shown here suggest that infection-elicited neutralizing antibodies capable of inhibiting cell-to-cell virus spread can be underrepresented in most infected subjects. These observations can be of great help in better understanding the role of humoral immunity in controlling virus reactivation and in the perspective of developing novel therapeutic strategies, studying novel correlates of protection, and designing effective vaccines.

scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Spread in Oligodendrocytic Cells Is Highly Dependent on MAL Proteolipid

2019 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Antonio López-Guerrero ◽  
Carmen de la Nuez ◽  
Beatriz Praena ◽  
Enrique Sánchez-León ◽  
Claude Krummenacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Cell Contacts ◽  
Viral Spread ◽  
First Case ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Cell Spread ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Myelin and lymphocyte protein (MAL) is a tetraspan integral membrane protein that resides in detergent-insoluble membrane fractions enriched in condensed membranes. MAL is expressed in oligodendrocytes, in Schwann cells, where it is essential for the stability of myelin, and at the apical membrane of epithelial cells, where it has a critical role in transport. In T lymphocytes, MAL is found at the immunological synapse and plays a crucial role in exosome secretion. However, no involvement of MAL in viral infections has been reported so far. Here, we show that herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) virions travel in association with MAL-positive structures to reach the end of cellular processes, which contact uninfected oligodendrocytes. Importantly, the depletion of MAL led to a significant decrease in infection, with a drastic reduction in the number of lytic plaques in MAL-silenced cells. These results suggest a significant role for MAL in viral spread at cell contacts. The participation of MAL in the cell-to-cell spread of HSV-1 may shed light on the involvement of proteolipids in this process. IMPORTANCE Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is a neurotropic pathogen that can infect many types of cells and establish latent infections in neurons. HSV-1 may spread from infected to uninfected cells by two main routes: by cell-free virus or by cell-to-cell spread. In the first case, virions exit into the extracellular space and then infect another cell from the outside. In the second case, viral transmission occurs through cell-to-cell contacts via a mechanism that is still poorly understood. A third mode of spread, using extracellular vesicles, also exists. In this study, we demonstrate the important role for a myelin protein, myelin and lymphocyte protein (MAL), in the process of cell-to-cell viral spread in oligodendrocytes. We show that MAL is involved in trafficking of virions along cell processes and that MAL depletion produces a significant alteration in the viral cycle, which reduces cell-to cell spread of HSV-1.

scholarly journals A Heptad Repeat in Herpes Simplex Virus 1 gH, Located Downstream of the α-Helix with Attributes of a Fusion Peptide, Is Critical for Virus Entry and Fusion

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
pp. 7042-7049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Gianni ◽  
Laura Menotti ◽  
Gabriella Campadelli-Fiume
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Virus Entry ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Fusion Peptide ◽  
Heptad Repeat ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Α Helix ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Hsv 1

ABSTRACT Entry of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) into cells occurs by fusion with cell membranes; it requires gD as the receptor binding glycoprotein and the trigger of fusion, and the trio of the conserved glycoproteins gB, gH, and gL to execute fusion. Recently, we reported that the ectodomain of HSV-1 gH carries a hydrophobic α-helix (residues 377 to 397) with attributes of an internal fusion peptide (T. Gianni, P. L. Martelli, R. Casadio, and G. Campadelli-Fiume, J. Virol. 79:2931-2940, 2005). Downstream of this α-helix, a heptad repeat (HR) with a high propensity to form a coiled coil was predicted between residues 443 and 471 and was designated HR-1. The simultaneous substitution of two amino acids in HR-1 (E450G and L453A), predicted to abolish the coiled coil, abolished the ability of gH to complement the infectivity of a gH-null HSV mutant. When coexpressed with gB, gD, and gL, the mutant gH was unable to promote cell-cell fusion. These defects were not attributed to a defect in heterodimer formation with gL, the gH chaperone, or in trafficking to the plasma membrane. A 25-amino-acid synthetic peptide with the sequence of HR-1 (pep-gHwt25) inhibited HSV replication if present at the time of virus entry into the cell. A scrambled peptide had no effect. The effect was specific, as pep-gHwt25 did not reduce HSV-2 and pseudorabies virus infection. The presence of a functional HR in the HSV-1 gH ectodomain strengthens the view that gH has attributes typical of a viral fusion glycoprotein.

scholarly journals Differential Requirements for gE, gI, and UL16 among Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Syncytial Variants Suggest Unique Modes of Dysregulating the Mechanism of Cell-to-Cell Spread

2019 ◽  
Vol 93 (15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jillian C. Carmichael ◽  
John W. Wills
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Cell Junctions ◽  
Accessory Protein ◽  
Accessory Proteins ◽  
Viral Fusion ◽  
Herpes Simplex Virus 1 ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Cell Spread

ABSTRACTLike all the herpesviruses, herpes simplex virus encodes machinery that enables it to move through cell junctions to avoid neutralizing antibodies. This cell-to-cell spread mechanism requires the viral fusion machinery (gD, gH/gL, and gB) and numerous accessory proteins. Of all of these, minor alterations to only four proteins (gB, gK, UL20, or UL24) will dysregulate the fusion machinery, allowing the formation of syncytia. In contrast, removal of individual accessory proteins will block cell-to-cell spread, forcing the virus to transmit in a cell-free manner. In the context of a Syn variant, removal of a required accessory protein will block cell fusion, again forcing cell-free spread. This has been investigated most thoroughly for gBsyn variants, which lose their syncytial phenotype in the absence of several accessory proteins, including gE, gI, UL16, and UL21, which are known to physically interact. Recently it was found that UL21 is not needed for gKsyn-, UL20syn-, or UL24syn-induced cell fusion, and hence it was of interest to ascertain whether gE, gI, and UL16 are required for Syn variants other than gBsyn. Null mutants of these were each combined with seven syncytial variants distributed among gK, UL20, and UL24. Surprisingly, very different patterns of accessory protein requirements were revealed. Indeed, for the three gKsyn variants tested, two different patterns were found. Also, three mutants were able to replicate without causing cytopathic effects. These findings show that mutations that produce Syn variants dysregulate the cell-to-cell-spread machinery in unique ways and provide clues for elucidating how this virus moves between cells.IMPORTANCEApproximately 2/3 of adults worldwide are latently infected with herpes simplex virus 1. Upon reactivation, the virus has the ability to evade neutralizing antibodies by moving through cell junctions, but the mechanism of direct cell-to-cell spread is poorly understood. The machinery that assembles between cells includes the viral fusion proteins and various accessory proteins that prevent cells from fusing. Alterations in four proteins will dysregulate the machinery, allowing neighboring cells to fuse to make syncytia, but this can be prevented by removing various individual accessory proteins to further disable the machinery. Previously, the accessory protein UL21 was found to be important for the activity of some syncytial variants but not others. In this study, we discovered that UL16, gE, and gI all act differently in how they control the fusion machinery. A better understanding of the mechanism of cell-to-cell spread may enable the development of drugs that block it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document