scholarly journals Effect of intracellular vesicular stomatitis virus mRNA concentration on the inhibition of host cell protein synthesis.

1983 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 206-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
W M Schnitzlein ◽  
M K O'Banion ◽  
M K Poirot ◽  
M E Reichmann
2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (13) ◽  
pp. e00403-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana González-Hernández ◽  
Markus Hoffmann ◽  
Constantin Brinkmann ◽  
Julia Nehls ◽  
Michael Winkler ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe interferon-induced antiviral host cell protein tetherin can inhibit the release of several enveloped viruses from infected cells. The Ebola virus (EBOV) glycoprotein (GP) antagonizes tetherin, but the domains and amino acids in GP that are required for tetherin antagonism have not been fully defined. A GXXXA motif within the transmembrane domain (TMD) of EBOV-GP was previously shown to be important for GP-mediated cellular detachment. Here, we investigated whether this motif also contributes to tetherin antagonism. Mutation of the GXXXA motif did not impact GP expression or particle incorporation and only modestly reduced EBOV-GP-driven entry. In contrast, the GXXXA motif was required for tetherin antagonism in transfected cells. Moreover, alteration of the GXXXA motif increased tetherin sensitivity of a replication-competent vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) chimera encoding EBOV-GP. Although these results await confirmation with authentic EBOV, they indicate that a GXXXA motif in the TMD of EBOV-GP is important for tetherin antagonism. Moreover, they provide the first evidence that GP can antagonize tetherin in the context of an infectious EBOV surrogate.IMPORTANCEThe glycoprotein (GP) of Ebola virus (EBOV) inhibits the antiviral host cell protein tetherin and may promote viral spread in tetherin-positive cells. However, tetherin antagonism by GP has so far been demonstrated only with virus-like particles, and it is unknown whether GP can block tetherin in infected cells. Moreover, a mutation in GP that selectively abrogates tetherin antagonism is unknown. Here, we show that a GXXXA motif in the transmembrane domain of EBOV-GP, which was previously reported to be required for GP-mediated cell rounding, is also important for tetherin counteraction. Moreover, analysis of this mutation in the context of vesicular stomatitis virus chimeras encoding EBOV-GP revealed that GP-mediated tetherin counteraction is operative in infected cells. To our knowledge, these findings demonstrate for the first time that GP can antagonize tetherin in infected cells and provide a tool to study the impact of GP-dependent tetherin counteraction on EBOV spread.


1988 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 803-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guy Lemay

This short review focuses on the mechanisms involved in transcription and translation in mouse L cells infected with reoviruses. The viral genomic RNA (double-stranded), retained in the inner capsid following removal of the outer capsid of the infecting virion, is transcribed by a viral polymerase. The synthesized viral mRNA is blocked at the 5′ end by a cap structure similar to the cap structure of cellular mRNA but synthesized by the viral enzymes of the inner capsid. This viral mRNA is also used as the first strand and template for the synthesis of the second strand of viral genomic RNA; the newly replicated genome is retained in an inner capsid structure to generate the progeny subviral particles. These particles are active at the transcriptional level but do not synthesize the cap, owing to the absence of the guanylyltransferase activity involved in the formation of this structure. The uncapped mRNA, or late viral mRNA, constitutes the bulk part of viral mRNA. The transcription of the viral genome is finally arrested upon addition of outer capsid proteins to obtain a mature virion. During viral multiplication, there is a gradual inhibition of host-cell protein synthesis, concomitant with stimulation of late viral mRNA translation. The two phenomena are apparently distinct. Furthermore, the inhibition of host-cell protein synthesis has been shown to be dispensable for normal virus multiplication; however, it might accelerate it. The mechanisms responsible for inhibition are still unclear but might involve modifications in the activity of cellular cap-binding proteins. This last point suggests an analogy with poliovirus infection; the two systems are thus briefly compared. Possible significance of the absence of a poly(A) tract at the 3′ end of reovirus mRNA, in contrast to the occurrence of such a sequence at the end of cellular mRNA, is also examined. Different models involving cap discrimination, competition between mRNAs, or alteration of cell membrane permeability have been proposed to explain the events observed at the translational level in reovirus-infected cells. These different models are compared. Finally, recent data implicating the viral sigma 3 capsid protein in efficient translation of late viral mRNA are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document