scholarly journals Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein E Domains Involved in Virus Spread and Disease

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (15) ◽  
pp. 6712-6719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Saldanha ◽  
John Lubinski ◽  
Claudia Martin ◽  
Thandavarayan Nagashunmugam ◽  
Liyang Wang ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein E (gE) functions as an immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fc binding protein and is involved in virus spread. Previously we studied a gE mutant virus that was impaired for IgG Fc binding but intact for spread and another that was normal for both activities. To further evaluate the role of gE in spread, two additional mutant viruses were constructed by introducing linker insertion mutations either outside the IgG Fc binding domain at gE position 210 or within the IgG Fc binding domain at position 380. Both mutant viruses were impaired for spread in epidermal cells in vitro; however, the 380 mutant virus was significantly more impaired and was as defective as gE null virus. gE mutant viruses were inoculated into the murine flank to measure epidermal disease at the inoculation site, travel of virus to dorsal root ganglia, and spread of virus from ganglia back to skin to produce zosteriform lesions. Disease at the inoculation and zosteriform sites was reduced for both mutant viruses, but more so for the 380 mutant virus. Moreover, the 380 mutant virus was highly impaired in its ability to reach the ganglia, as demonstrated by virus culture and real-time quantitative PCR. The results indicate that the domain surrounding amino acid 380 is important for both spread and IgG Fc binding and suggest that this domain is a potential target for antiviral therapy or vaccines.

1994 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 5384-5394 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Matusick-Kumar ◽  
W Hurlburt ◽  
S P Weinheimer ◽  
W W Newcomb ◽  
J C Brown ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 1039-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Browne ◽  
Susanne Bell ◽  
Tony Minson

ABSTRACT A mutant of herpes simplex virus type 1 lacking both glycoprotein M and glycoprotein E was marginally compromised in terms of its in vitro growth characteristics. This finding is in marked contrast to a similar mutant of the related alphaherpesvirus, pseudorabies virus (A. R. Brack, J. M. Dijkstra, H. Granzow, B. G. Klupp, and T. C. Mettenleiter, J. Virol. 73:5364-5372, 1999), and suggests that the glycoprotein requirements for virion assembly may vary among different members of this family of viruses.


Virology ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 469-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Homayon Ghiasi ◽  
Ravi Kaiwar ◽  
Anthony B. Nesburn ◽  
Susan Slanina ◽  
Steven L. Wechsler

2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (14) ◽  
pp. 6935-6941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren M. Hook ◽  
Jialing Huang ◽  
Ming Jiang ◽  
Richard Hodinka ◽  
Harvey M. Friedman

ABSTRACT Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) glycoprotein C (gC) blocks complement activation, and glycoprotein E (gE) interferes with IgG Fc-mediated activities. While evaluating gC- and gE-mediated immune evasion in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HSV-1-coinfected subjects, we noted that antibody alone was more effective at neutralizing a strain with mutations in gC and gE (gC/gE) than a wild-type (WT) virus. This result was unexpected since gC and gE are postulated to interfere with complement-mediated neutralization. We used pooled human immunoglobulin G (IgG) from HIV-negative donors to confirm the results and evaluated mechanisms of the enhanced antibody neutralization. We demonstrated that differences in antibody neutralization cannot be attributed to the concentrations of HSV-1 glycoproteins on the two viruses or to the absence of an IgG Fc receptor on the gC/gE mutant virus or to enhanced neutralization of the mutant virus by antibodies that target only gB, gD, or gH/gL, which are the glycoproteins involved in virus entry. Since sera from HIV-infected subjects and pooled human IgG contain antibodies against multiple glycoproteins, we determined whether differences in neutralization become apparent when antibodies to gB, gD, or gH/gL are used in combination. Neutralization of the gC/gE mutant was greatly increased compared that of WT virus when any two of the antibodies against gB, gD, or gH/gL were used in combination. These results suggest that gC and gE on WT virus provide a shield against neutralizing antibodies that interfere with gB-gD, gB-gH/gL, or gD-gH/gL interactions and that one function of virus neutralization is to prevent interactions between these glycoproteins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document