scholarly journals Cellular Ras and Cyclin D1 Are Required during Different Cell Cycle Periods in Cycling NIH 3T3 Cells

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 4623-4632 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Hitomi ◽  
Dennis W. Stacey
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

ABSTRACT Novel techniques were used to determine when in the cell cycle of proliferating NIH 3T3 cells cellular Ras and cyclin D1 are required. For comparison, in quiescent cells, all four of the inhibitors of cell cycle progression tested (anti-Ras, anti-cyclin D1, serum removal, and cycloheximide) became ineffective at essentially the same point in G1 phase, approximately 4 h prior to the beginning of DNA synthesis. To extend these studies to cycling cells, a time-lapse approach was used to determine the approximate cell cycle position of individual cells in an asynchronous culture at the time of inhibitor treatment and then to determine the effects of the inhibitor upon recipient cells. With this approach, anti-Ras antibody efficiently inhibited entry into S phase only when introduced into cells prior to the preceding mitosis, several hours before the beginning of S phase. Anti-cyclin D1, on the other hand, was an efficient inhibitor when introduced up until just before the initiation of DNA synthesis. Cycloheximide treatment, like anti-cyclin D1 microinjection, was inhibitory throughout G1 phase (which lasts a total of 4 to 5 h in these cells). Finally, serum removal blocked entry into S phase only during the first hour following mitosis. Kinetic analysis and a novel dual-labeling technique were used to confirm the differences in cell cycle requirements for Ras, cyclin D1, and cycloheximide. These studies demonstrate a fundamental difference in mitogenic signal transduction between quiescent and cycling NIH 3T3 cells and reveal a sequence of signaling events required for cell cycle progression in proliferating NIH 3T3 cells.

scholarly journals Cell Cycle Progression Regulates Biogenesis and Cellular Localization of Lipid Droplets

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
André L. S. Cruz ◽  
Nina Carrossini ◽  
Leonardo K. Teixeira ◽  
Luis F. Ribeiro-Pinto ◽  
Patricia T. Bozza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Lipid Accumulation ◽  
Lipid Droplets ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Transformation ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

ABSTRACTIntracellular lipid accumulation has been associated with a poor prognosis in cancer. We have previously reported the involvement of lipid droplets in cell proliferation in colon cancer cells, suggesting a role for these organelles in cancer development. In this study, we evaluate the role of lipid droplets in cell cycle regulation and cellular transformation. Cell cycle synchronization of NIH 3T3 cells revealed increased numbers and dispersed distribution of lipid droplets specifically during S phase. Also, the transformed cell lineage NIH 3T3-H-rasV12showed an accumulation of both lipid droplets and PLIN2 protein above the levels in NIH 3T3 cells.PLIN2gene overexpression, however, was not able to induce NIH 3T3 cell transformation, disproving the hypothesis thatPLIN2is an oncogene. Furthermore, positive PLIN2 staining was strongly associated with highly proliferative Ki-67-positive areas in human colon adenocarcinoma tissue samples. Taken together, these results indicate that cell cycle progression is associated with tight regulation of lipid droplets, a process that is altered in transformed cells, suggesting the existence of a mechanism that connects cell cycle progression and cell proliferation with lipid accumulation.

scholarly journals CtIP Activates Its Own and Cyclin D1 Promoters via the E2F/RB Pathway during G1/S Progression

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 3124-3134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Liu ◽  
Wen-Hwa Lee
Keyword(s):  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Primary Mouse ◽  
Rb Pathway ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

ABSTRACT Cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase is mainly controlled by E2F transcription factors and RB family proteins. Previously we showed that the presence of CtIP is essential for G1/S transition in primary mouse blastocysts, as well as in NIH 3T3 cells. However, how CtIP executes this function remains to be elucidated. Here we show that in NIH 3T3 cells the expression of CtIP is regulated by the E2F/RB pathway during late G1 and S phases. The presence of wild-type CtIP, but not the E157K mutant form, which failed to interact with RB, enhanced its own promoter activity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis indicated that the recruitment of CtIP to its promoter occurs concomitantly with TFIIB, a component of the RNA polymerase II complex, and with dissociation of RB from the promoter during late G1 and G1/S transition. Similar positive regulation of cyclin D1 expression by CtIP was also observed. Consistently, cells expressing the CtIP(E157K) protein alone exhibited growth retardation, an increase in the G1 population, and a decrease in the S-phase population. Taken together, these results suggest that, contrary to the postulated universal corepressor role, CtIP activates a subset of E2F-responsive promoters by releasing RB-imposed repression and therefore promotes G1/S progression.

scholarly journals The jun and fos protein families are both required for cell cycle progression in fibroblasts.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4466-4472 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Kovary ◽  
R Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Fos Protein ◽  
Stimulation Of

The expression of different members of the Jun and Fos families of transcription factors is rapidly induced following serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts. To determine whether these proteins are required for cell cycle progression, we microinjected affinity-purified antibodies directed against c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, c-Jun, JunB, and JunD, and antibodies that recognize either the Fos or the Jun family of proteins, into Swiss 3T3 cells and determined their effects in cell cycle progression by monitoring DNA synthesis. We found that microinjection of anti-Fos and anti-Jun family antibodies efficiently blocked the entrance to the S phase of serum-stimulated or asynchronously growing cells. However, the antibodies against single members of the Fos family only partially inhibited DNA synthesis. In contrast, all three Jun antibodies prevented DNA synthesis more effectively than did any of the anti-Fos antibodies.

scholarly journals Unusual proliferation arrest and transcriptional control properties of a newly discovered E2F family member, E2F-6

1998 ◽  
Vol 95 (16) ◽  
pp. 9190-9195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gaubatz ◽  
Jason G. Wood ◽  
David M. Livingston
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
E2f Transcription Factors ◽  
Regulation Of Cell Cycle ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

E2F transcription factors play an important role in the regulation of cell cycle progression. We report here the cloning and characterization of an additional member of this family, E2F-6. E2F-6 lacks pocket protein binding and transactivation domains, and it is a potent transcriptional repressor that contains a modular repression domain at its carboxyl terminus. Overproduction of E2F-6 had no specific effect on cell cycle progression in asynchronously growing Saos2 and NIH 3T3 cells, but it inhibited entry into S phase of NIH 3T3 cells stimulated to exit G0. Taken together, these data suggest that E2F-6 can regulate a subset of E2F-dependent genes whose products are required for entry into the cell cycle but not for normal cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Interference of cell cycle progression by zidovudine and lamivudine in NIH 3T3 cells

Mutagenesis ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-L. Fang ◽  
L. J. McGarrity ◽  
F. A. Beland
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

scholarly journals ΔRaf-1:ER* Bypasses the Cyclic AMP Block of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1 and 2 Activation but Not CDK2 Activation or Cell Cycle Reentry

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (24) ◽  
pp. 9303-9317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Balmanno ◽  
Tracy Millar ◽  
Martin McMahon ◽  
Simon J. Cook
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclic Amp ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cyclin A ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Reentry ◽  
Extracellular Signal ◽  
Nih 3T3 ◽  
Nih 3T3 Cells

ABSTRACT Elevation of cellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels inhibits cell cycle reentry in a variety of cell types. While cAMP can prevent the activation of Raf-1 and extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) by growth factors, we now show that activation of ERK1/2 by ΔRaf-1:ER is insensitive to cAMP. Despite this, ΔRaf-1:ER-stimulated DNA synthesis is still inhibited by cAMP, indicating a cAMP-sensitive step downstream of ERK1/2. Although cyclin D1 expression has been proposed as an alternative target for cAMP, we found that cAMP could inhibit ΔRaf-1:ER-induced cyclin D1 expression only in Rat-1 cells, not in CCl39 or NIH 3T3 cells. ΔRaf-1:ER-stimulated activation of CDK2 was strongly inhibited by cAMP in all three cell lines, but cAMP had no effect on the induction of p21CIP1. cAMP blocked the fetal bovine serum (FBS)-induced degradation of p27KIP1; however, loss of p27KIP1 in response to ΔRaf-1:ER was less sensitive in CCl39 and Rat-1 cells and was completely independent of cAMP in NIH 3T3 cells. The most consistent effect of cAMP was to block both FBS- and ΔRaf-1:ER-induced expression of Cdc25A and cyclin A, two important activators of CDK2. When CDK2 activity was bypassed by activation of the ER-E2F1 fusion protein, cAMP no longer inhibited expression of Cdc25A or cyclin A but still inhibited DNA synthesis. These studies reveal multiple points of cAMP sensitivity during cell cycle reentry. Inhibition of Raf-1 and ERK1/2 activation may operate early in G1, but when this early block is bypassed by ΔRaf-1:ER, cells still fail to enter S phase due to inhibition of CDK2 or targets downstream of E2F1.

The jun and fos protein families are both required for cell cycle progression in fibroblasts

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4466-4472
Author(s):  
K Kovary ◽  
R Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
3T3 Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Serum Stimulation ◽  
Fos Protein ◽  
Stimulation Of

The expression of different members of the Jun and Fos families of transcription factors is rapidly induced following serum stimulation of quiescent fibroblasts. To determine whether these proteins are required for cell cycle progression, we microinjected affinity-purified antibodies directed against c-Fos, FosB, Fra-1, c-Jun, JunB, and JunD, and antibodies that recognize either the Fos or the Jun family of proteins, into Swiss 3T3 cells and determined their effects in cell cycle progression by monitoring DNA synthesis. We found that microinjection of anti-Fos and anti-Jun family antibodies efficiently blocked the entrance to the S phase of serum-stimulated or asynchronously growing cells. However, the antibodies against single members of the Fos family only partially inhibited DNA synthesis. In contrast, all three Jun antibodies prevented DNA synthesis more effectively than did any of the anti-Fos antibodies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document