scholarly journals The Orphan Nuclear Receptor SHP Utilizes Conserved LXXLL-Related Motifs for Interactions with Ligand-Activated Estrogen Receptors

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1124-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotta Johansson ◽  
Ann Båvner ◽  
Jane S. Thomsen ◽  
MatHias Färnegårdh ◽  
Jan-Åke Gustafsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Estrogen Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Mechanistic Explanation ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Ligand Binding Domain ◽  
Orphan Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Mechanistic Basis

ABSTRACT SHP (short heterodimer partner) is an unusual orphan nuclear receptor consisting only of a ligand-binding domain, and it exhibits unique features of interaction with conventional nuclear receptors. While the mechanistic basis of these interactions has remained enigmatic, SHP has been suggested to inhibit nuclear receptor activation by at least three alternatives; inhibition of DNA binding via dimerization, direct antagonism of coactivator function via competition, and possibly transrepression via recruitment of putative corepressors. We now show that SHP binds directly to estrogen receptors via LXXLL-related motifs. Similar motifs, referred to as NR (nuclear receptor) boxes, are usually critical for the binding of coactivators to the ligand-regulated activation domain AF-2 within nuclear receptors. In concordance with the NR box dependency, SHP requires the intact AF-2 domain of agonist-bound estrogen receptors for interaction. Mutations within the ligand-binding domain helix 12, or binding of antagonistic ligands, which are known to result in an incomplete AF-2 surface, abolish interactions with SHP. Supporting the idea that SHP directly antagonizes receptor activation via AF-2 binding, we demonstrate that SHP variants, carrying either interaction-defective NR box mutations or a deletion of the repressor domain, have lost the capacity to inhibit agonist-dependent transcriptional estrogen receptor activation. Furthermore, our studies indicate that SHP may function as a cofactor via the formation of ternary complexes with dimeric receptors on DNA. These novel insights provide a mechanistic explanation for the inhibitory role of SHP in nuclear receptor signaling, and they may explain how SHP functions as a negative coregulator or corepressor for ligand-activated receptors, a novel and unique function for an orphan nuclear receptor.

scholarly journals The Crystal Structure of the Orphan Nuclear Receptor NR2E3/PNR Ligand Binding Domain Reveals a Dimeric Auto-Repressed Conformation

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e74359 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Eileen Tan ◽  
X. Edward Zhou ◽  
Fen-Fen Soon ◽  
Xiaodan Li ◽  
Jun Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Ligand Binding Domain ◽  
Orphan Nuclear Receptor

scholarly journals Phosphorylation and Intramolecular Stabilization of the Ligand Binding Domain in the Nuclear Receptor Steroidogenic Factor 1

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 7193-7203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Desclozeaux ◽  
Irina N. Krylova ◽  
Florence Horn ◽  
Robert J. Fletterick ◽  
Holly A. Ingraham
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Activation Function ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Ligand Binding Domain ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Orphan Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Steroidogenic Factor 1 ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Biochemical Analyses

ABSTRACT Steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) is an orphan nuclear receptor with no known ligand. We showed previously that phosphorylation at serine 203 located N′-terminal to the ligand binding domain (LBD) enhanced cofactor recruitment, analogous to the ligand-mediated recruitment in ligand-dependent receptors. In this study, results of biochemical analyses and an LBD helix assembly assay suggest that the SF-1 LBD adopts an active conformation, with helices 1 and 12 packed against the predicted alpha-helical bundle, in the apparent absence of ligand. Fine mapping of the previously defined proximal activation function in SF-1 showed that the activation function mapped fully to helix 1 of the LBD. Limited proteolyses demonstrate that phosphorylation of S203 in the hinge region mimics the stabilizing effects of ligand on the LBD. Moreover, similar effects were observed in an SF-1/thyroid hormone LBD chimera receptor, illustrating that the S203 phosphorylation effects are transferable to a heterologous ligand-dependent receptor. Our collective data suggest that the hinge together with helix 1 is an individualized specific motif, which is tightly associated with its cognate LBD. For SF-1, we find that this intramolecular association and hence receptor activity are further enhanced by mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation, thus mimicking many of the ligand-induced changes observed for ligand-dependent receptors.

scholarly journals Heterodimeric interaction between retinoid X receptor alpha and orphan nuclear receptor OR1 reveals dimerization-induced activation as a novel mechanism of nuclear receptor activation.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 3977-3986 ◽  
Author(s):  
F F Wiebel ◽  
J A Gustafsson
Keyword(s):  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Retinoid X Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Responses ◽  
Receptor Alpha ◽  
Retinoid X Receptor Alpha

OR1 is a member of the steroid/thyroid hormone nuclear receptor superfamily which has been described to mediate transcriptional responses to retinoids and oxysterols. On a DR4 response element, an OR1 heterodimer with the nuclear receptor retinoid X receptor alpha (RXR alpha) has been described to convey transcriptional activation in both the absence and presence of the RXR ligand 9-cis retinoic acid, the mechanisms of which have remained unclear. Here, we dissect the effects of RXR alpha and OR1 ligand-binding domain interaction on transcriptional regulation and the role of the respective carboxy-terminal activation domains (AF-2s) in the absence and presence of the RXR ligand, employing chimeras of the nuclear receptors containing the heterologous GAL4 DNA-binding domain as well as natural receptors. The results show that the interaction of the RXR and OR1 ligand-binding domains unleashes a transcription activation potential that is mainly dependent on the AF-2 of OR1, indicating that interaction with RXR activates OR1. This defines dimerization-induced activation as a novel function of heterodimeric interaction and mechanism of receptor activation not previously described for nuclear receptors. Moreover, we present evidence that activation of OR1 occurs by a conformational change induced upon heterodimerization with RXR.

scholarly journals Nuclear receptor phosphorylation in xenobiotic signal transduction

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (45) ◽  
pp. 15210-15225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiko Negishi ◽  
Kaoru Kobayashi ◽  
Tsutomu Sakuma ◽  
Tatsuya Sueyoshi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cell Signaling ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Pregnane X Receptor ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Mechanism ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Phosphorylation Motif

Nuclear pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2) and constitutive active/androstane receptor (CAR, NR1I3) are nuclear receptors characterized in 1998 by their capability to respond to xenobiotics and activate cytochrome P450 (CYP) genes. An anti-epileptic drug, phenobarbital (PB), activates CAR and its target CYP2B genes, whereas PXR is activated by drugs such as rifampicin and statins for the CYP3A genes. Inevitably, both nuclear receptors have been investigated as ligand-activated nuclear receptors by identifying and characterizing xenobiotics and therapeutics that directly bind CAR and/or PXR to activate them. However, PB, which does not bind CAR directly, presented an alternative research avenue for an indirect ligand-mediated nuclear receptor activation mechanism: phosphorylation-mediated signal regulation. This review summarizes phosphorylation-based mechanisms utilized by xenobiotics to elicit cell signaling. First, the review presents how PB activates CAR (and other nuclear receptors) through a conserved phosphorylation motif located between two zinc fingers within its DNA-binding domain. PB-regulated phosphorylation at this motif enables nuclear receptors to form communication networks, integrating their functions. Next, the review discusses xenobiotic-induced PXR activation in the absence of the conserved DNA-binding domain phosphorylation motif. In this case, phosphorylation occurs at a motif located within the ligand-binding domain to transduce cell signaling that regulates hepatic energy metabolism. Finally, the review delves into the implications of xenobiotic-induced signaling through phosphorylation in disease development and progression.

scholarly journals SUN-LB138 Dynamic Structural Model of Testosterone Entry Into the Unliganded Androgen Receptor

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Krylova ◽  
Fred J Schaufele ◽  
Christophe Guilbert
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptors ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Binding Pocket ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Receptor Ligand ◽  
Ligand Binding Pocket ◽  
Crystallographic Structures

Abstract Background: Crystallographic structures of nuclear receptor ligand binding domains provide a static model of a receptor stably wrapped around an internalized ligand. Understanding the dynamics of a receptor at different stages of ligand binding has been hampered by the paucity of crystal structures for unliganded nuclear receptors. Molecular dynamic models have been constructed for some nuclear receptors to fill that void. Methods: The molecular simulation docking program MORDOR (MOlecular Recognition with a Driven dynamics OptimizeR)(1) was used to study the structural dynamics of the androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) modeled from the static structure of the AR LBD bound to testosterone (T) (PDB ID: 2AM9). The goals of the study were to understand a) the dynamic interaction of the T in its binding pocket, b) AR LBD structural flexibilities that permit T entry/exit from the binding pocket and c) a model of the unliganded AR LBD. Results: Modeling AR LBD structure flexibility over time revealed possible alternative dynamic structures, including those without ligand, overlaid against the canonical nuclear receptor structure. The model dynamically tracks the structural changes as a ligand enters into the ligand binding domain and nestles into the ligand binding pocket. The model predicted the appearance of alpha helices within the AR LBD that transiently fold/unfold during the ligand entry phases. Once in the pocket, the ligand itself remains very dynamic in a still flexible pocket. The model predicted also AR LBD amino acids that sequentially interact with the ligand during its dynamic entry into the AR LBD. Intriguingly, those AR amino acids include those mutated in castration-resistant prostate tumors that continue to grow during androgen suppression therapy. Functional studies showed those mutant ARs had a primary consequence of enhancing response to lower level T, and other androgens, consistent with their role in creating a higher affinity AR that can scavenge low-level androgens in an androgen-suppressed patient. Conclusions: The molecular model of T binding to the AR LBD suggests a degree of structural dynamism not evident in the crystallographic structures commonly associated with nuclear receptors. Some AR mutations activating prostate tumor growth may do so by impacting androgen entry/exit, rather than by altering androgen fit into the ligand binding pocket. Reference: (1) Guilbert C, James TL (2008) J Chem Inf Model. 2008 48(6): 1257-1268. doi: 10.1021/ci8000327

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document