ALTERNATE FIELD CAMP ACTIVITIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT LITTLE ROCK THAT INCORPORATE DIGITAL TECHNIQUES AND LOCALITIES NEAR AND FAR

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret E. McMillan ◽  
◽  
Michael T. DeAngelis ◽  
Jeffrey B. Connelly
1989 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph B. Hammond ◽  
Ann J. West

This article describes a biofeedback technician training program that allowed the university to solve problems concerning budget, dwindling resources, and providing clinical training experiences for students. The program functioned for 7 years at graduate and undergraduate levels with the cooperation of two independent departments, Department of Psychology and the Counseling Center, at University of Arkansas at Little Rock. Selection and training of participants in the program, equipment used, cost-effectiveness, and benefits to all involved are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44
Author(s):  
Tracey M. Barnett McElwee ◽  
◽  
Allison Ames Boykin ◽  
Cynthia Wyman Bookwalter ◽  
Reina Olivo ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 74-79
Author(s):  
John S. Miller ◽  
Cal Ledbetter

The effectiveness and efficiency of the justice system is a continuing focus of research, and public attention. Burdened by crowded dockets and demands policy for improved conditions and service, the justice system is examining new operative and management alternatives to traditional adjudication such as court-ordered arbitration, mediation programs and even private sector initiatives for handling disputes. In this paper we discuss the Pulaski County Mediation Program (MPX an innovative alternative to the traditional courtroom resolution 01 disputes in small claims, juvenile, and chancery court. The MP brings together, in a joint program, the needs, facilities, support and strengths of Pulaski County and the human and administrative resources of the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR), College of Liberal Arts.


Author(s):  
Andrew B. Wright ◽  
Ann M. Wright

A novel Control and Sensor System (CASSY) has been developed to teach controls engineering to electrical and mechanical students. The inexpensive platform, which can be built for under $1500, has a first order velocity loop and a first order yaw rate loop with friction. A detailed model of the robot allows students to perform system identification and compare with the model. Students can implement PID, digital filter, and state space controllers on the robot, vary constants, measure performance, identify stability, and perform step and sine based system identification on the open and closed loop system. Wireless telemetry between the robot and a host computer allow all the control signals to be saved for later analysis. Fabrication guides and training videos are located on robotics.ualr.edu, and the robot has been fabricated by students at UALR and Hendrix College, demonstrating the ease with which the platform can be integrated into a curriculum. The CASSY platform has been used in both undergraduate and graduate control courses at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock. The practical robot experiments have improved learning outcomes of the largely theoretical material.


HortScience ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 564A-564
Author(s):  
Jon T. Lindstrom ◽  
James Robbins ◽  
Gerald Klingaman ◽  
Scott Starr ◽  
Janet Carlson

The Univ. of Arkansas initiated a statewide plant evaluation program in 1999. This trial will enable us to evaluate plants on a statewide basis, improve statewide marketing programs, and serve as a propagation source for nonpatented or non-trademarked material. Trees and shrubs will be evaluated for 5 years and herbaceous material for 3 years. Three test sites were established across the state, one in Fayetteville, Little Rock, and Hope, Ark. These sites correspond to the three USDA plant hardiness zones found in Arkansas (Zones 6, 7, and 8). A consistent planting protocol (e.g., distance between plants, irrigation system, bed width) is used at all three locations. Data collection consists of annual growth measurements and qualitative evaluations for factors such as time of flowering, length of flowering, and disease or insect problems. A standard protocol has been established for identifying future plants to be evaluated in the program. In the first year, 17 accessions were planted at each of the three different locations. Best plant growth on 15 of the 17 accessions occurred at the Little Rock site. This may be a reflection of the environment present at the sites in Hope and Fayetteville. Both of these sites are exposed, full-sun situations, whereas the Little Rock site receives some afternoon shade. Reception to this trial program has been favorable, with the Little Rock site gaining much attention from the Arkansas nursery industry.


1968 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 448-454
Author(s):  
William E. Jaques ◽  
William T. Kniker ◽  
Barry E. Gerald

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document