scholarly journals Impact of clinical decision support preventing the use of QT-prolonging medications for patients at risk for torsade de pointes

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (e1) ◽  
pp. e21-e27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Sorita ◽  
J Martijn Bos ◽  
Bruce W Morlan ◽  
Robert F Tarrell ◽  
Michael J Ackerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Torsade De Pointes ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Medication Administration ◽  
Alert System ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Physician Order Entry

Abstract We developed and implemented a ‘CPOE-QT Alert’ system, that is, clinical decision support integrated in the computerized physician order entry system (CPOE), in 2011. The system identifies any attempts to order medications with risk of torsade de pointes (TdP) for patients with a history of significant QT prolongation (QTc ≥500 ms) and alerts the provider entering the order. We assessed its impact by comparing orders and subsequent medication administration before and after activation of the system. We found a significant decrease in the proportion of completed order per ordering attempt after system activation (94% (1293/1379) vs 77% (1888/2453), difference 16.8%; p<0.001). This resulted in a 13.9% reduction in the administration of those medications to patients. A significant decrease was observed across all provider types, educational levels, and specialties. The CPOE-QT Alert system successfully reduced exposure to QT-prolonging medications in high risk patients.

Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility: utilization of genetic results in an electronic medical record to increase safety

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (17) ◽  
pp. 1207-1215
Author(s):  
Jordan F Baye ◽  
Natasha J Petry ◽  
Shauna L Jacobson ◽  
Michelle M Moore ◽  
Bethany Tucker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Malignant Hyperthermia ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility ◽  
Alert System ◽  
Genotyping Platform

Aim: This manuscript describes implementation of clinical decision support for providers concerned with perioperative complications of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Materials & methods: Clinical decision support for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility was implemented in 2018 based around our pre-emptive genotyping platform. We completed a brief descriptive review of patients who underwent pre-emptive testing, focused particularly on RYR1 and CACNA1S genes. Results: To date, we have completed pre-emptive genetic testing on more than 10,000 patients; 13 patients having been identified as a carrier of a pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant of RYR1 or CACNA1S. Conclusion: An alert system for malignant hyperthermia susceptibility – as an extension of our pre-emptive genomics platform – was implemented successfully. Implementation strategies and lessons learned are discussed herein.

scholarly journals Transfusion Medicine Informatics: Analysis of User Burden from Clinical Decision Support Alerts in Promoting Patient Blood Management

2020 ◽  
Vol 154 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S123-S124
Author(s):  
H C Tsang ◽  
P Mathias ◽  
N Hoffman ◽  
M B Pagano
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Blood Product ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Blood Products ◽  
Blood Management ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Blood Utilization ◽  
Transfusion Ratio ◽  
Major Project

Abstract Introduction/Objective To increase efficiency of blood product ordering and delivery processes and improve appropriateness of orders, a major project to implement clinical decision support (CDS) alerts in the electronic medical record (EMR) was undertaken. A design team was assembled including hospital and laboratory medicine information technology and clinical informatics, transfusion services, nursing and clinical services from medical and surgical specialties. Methods Consensus-derived thresholds in hemoglobin/hematocrit, platelet count, INR, and fibrinogen for red blood cell (RBC), platelet, plasma, and cryoprecipitate blood products CDS alerts were determined. Data from the EMR and laboratory information system were queried from the 12-month period before and after implementation and the data was analyzed. Results During the analysis period, 5813 RBC (avg. monthly = 484), 1040 platelet (avg. monthly = 87), 423 plasma (avg. monthly = 35), and 88 cryoprecipitate (avg. monthly = 7) alerts fired. The average time it took for a user to respond was 5.175 seconds. The total amount of time alerts displayed over 12 months was 5813 seconds (~97 minutes of user time) compared to 56503 blood products transfused. Of active CDS alerts, hemoglobin/RBC alerts fired most often with ~1:5 (31141 RBC units) alert to transfusion ratio and 4% of orders canceled (n=231) when viewing the alert, platelet alerts fired with ~1:15 (15385 platelet units) alert to transfusion ratio and 6% orders canceled (n=66), INR/plasma alerts fired with ~1:21 (8793 plasma units) alert to transfusion ratio and 10% orders canceled (n=41), cryoprecipitate alerts fired with ~1:13 (1184 cryoprecipitate units) alert to transfusion ratio and 10% orders canceled (n=9). Overall monthly blood utilization normalized to 1000 patient discharges did not appear to have statistically significant differences comparing pre- versus post-go-live, except a potentially significant increase in monthly plasma usage at one facility with p = 0.34, although possibly due to an outlier single month of heavy usage. Conclusion Clinical decision support alerts can guide provider ordering with minimal user burden. This resulted in increased safety and quality use of the ordering process, although overall blood utilization did not appear to change significantly.

scholarly journals Implementation Strategies of a Quality Improvement Initiative for Hospital-Acquired Clostridioides difficile Infection Prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s279-s280
Author(s):  
Nicole Lamont ◽  
Lauren Bresee ◽  
Kathryn Bush ◽  
Blanda Chow ◽  
Bruce Dalton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Implementation Strategy ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Medication Administration ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Order Entry ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Number Of Patients

Background:Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the most common cause of infectious diarrhea in hospitalized patients. Probiotics have been studied as a measure to prevent CDI. Timely probiotic administration to at-risk patients receiving systemic antimicrobials presents significant challenges. We sought to determine optimal implementation methods to administer probiotics to all adult inpatients aged 55 years receiving a course of systemic antimicrobials across an entire health region. Methods: Using a randomized stepped-wedge design across 4 acute-care hospitals (n = 2,490 beds), the probiotic Bio-K+ was prescribed daily to patients receiving systemic antimicrobials and was continued for 5 days after antimicrobial discontinuation. Focus groups and interviews were conducted to identify barriers, and the implementation strategy was adapted to address the key identified barriers. The implementation strategy included clinical decision support involving a linked flag on antibiotic ordering and a 1-click order entry within the electronic medical record (EMR), provider and patient education (written/videos/in-person), and local site champions. Protocol adherence was measured by tracking the number of patients on therapeutic antimicrobials that received BioK+ based on the bedside nursing EMR medication administration records. Adherence rates were sorted by hospital and unit in 48- and 72-hour intervals with recording of percentile distribution of time (days) to receipt of the first antimicrobial. Results: In total, 340 education sessions with >1,800 key stakeholders occurred before and during implementation across the 4 involved hospitals. The overall adherence of probiotic ordering for wards with antimicrobial orders was 78% and 80% at 48 and 72 hours, respectively over 72 patient months. Individual hospital adherence rates varied between 77% and 80% at 48 hours and between 79% and 83% at 72 hours. Of 246,144 scheduled probiotic orders, 94% were administered at the bedside within a median of 0.61 days (75th percentile, 0.88), 0.47 days (75th percentile, 0.86), 0.71 days (75th percentile, 0.92) and 0.67 days (75th percentile, 0.93), respectively, at the 4 sites after receipt of first antimicrobial. The key themes from the focus groups emphasized the usefulness of the linked flag alert for probiotics on antibiotic ordering, the ease of the EMR 1-click order entry, and the importance of the education sessions. Conclusions: Electronic clinical decision support, education, and local champion support achieved a high implementation rate consistent across all sites. Use of a 1-click order entry in the EMR was considered a key component of the success of the implementation and should be considered for any implementation strategy for a stewardship initiative. Achieving high prescribing adherence allows more precision in evaluating the effectiveness of the probiotic strategy.Funding: Partnerships for Research and Innovation in the Health System, Alberta Innovates/Health Solutions Funding: AwardDisclosures: None

scholarly journals The use of a clinical decision support tool to assess the risk of QT drug–drug interactions in community pharmacies

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204209862199609
Author(s):  
Florine A. Berger ◽  
Heleen van der Sijs ◽  
Teun van Gelder ◽  
Patricia M. L. A. van den Bemt
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Tool ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Community Pharmacies ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Interacting Agents ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Structured Approach

Introduction: The handling of drug–drug interactions regarding QTc-prolongation (QT-DDIs) is not well defined. A clinical decision support (CDS) tool will support risk management of QT-DDIs. Therefore, we studied the effect of a CDS tool on the proportion of QT-DDIs for which an intervention was considered by pharmacists. Methods: An intervention study was performed using a pre- and post-design in 20 community pharmacies in The Netherlands. All QT-DDIs that occurred during a before- and after-period of three months were included. The impact of the use of a CDS tool to support the handling of QT-DDIs was studied. For each QT-DDI, handling of the QT-DDI and patient characteristics were extracted from the pharmacy information system. Primary outcome was the proportion of QT-DDIs with an intervention. Secondary outcomes were the type of interventions and the time associated with handling QT-DDIs. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the primary outcome. Results: Two hundred and forty-four QT-DDIs pre-CDS tool and 157 QT-DDIs post-CDS tool were included. Pharmacists intervened in 43.0% and 35.7% of the QT-DDIs pre- and post-CDS tool respectively (odds ratio 0.74; 95% confidence interval 0.49–1.11). Substitution of interacting agents was the most frequent intervention. Pharmacists spent 20.8 ± 3.5 min (mean ± SD) on handling QT-DDIs pre-CDS tool, which was reduced to 14.9 ± 2.4 min (mean ± SD) post-CDS tool. Of these, 4.5 ± 0.7 min (mean ± SD) were spent on the CDS tool. Conclusion: The CDS tool might be a first step to developing a tool to manage QT-DDIs via a structured approach. Improvement of the tool is needed in order to increase its diagnostic value and reduce redundant QT-DDI alerts. Plain Language Summary The use of a tool to support the handling of QTc-prolonging drug interactions in community pharmacies Introduction: Several drugs have the ability to cause heart rhythm disturbances as a rare side effect. This rhythm disturbance is called QTc-interval prolongation. It may result in cardiac arrest. For health care professionals, such as physicians and pharmacists, it is difficult to decide whether or not it is safe to proceed treating a patient with combinations of two or more of these QT-prolonging drugs. Recently, a tool was developed that supports the risk management of these QT drug–drug interactions (QT-DDIs). Methods: In this study, we studied the effect of this tool on the proportion of QT-DDIs for which an intervention was considered by pharmacists. An intervention study was performed using a pre- and post-design in 20 community pharmacies in The Netherlands. All QT-DDIs that occurred during a before- and after-period of 3 months were included. Results: Two hundred and forty-four QT-DDIs pre-implementation of the tool and 157 QT-DDIs post-implementation of the tool were included. Pharmacists intervened in 43.0% of the QT-DDIs before the tool was implemented and in 35.7% after implementation of the tool. Substitution of one of the interacting agents was the most frequent intervention. Pharmacists spent less time on handling QT-DDIs when the tool was used. Conclusion: The clinical decision support tool might be a first step to developing a tool to manage QT-DDIs via a structured approach.

scholarly journals Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Delvaux ◽  
Veerle Piessens ◽  
Tine De Burghgraeve ◽  
Pavlos Mamouris ◽  
Bert Vaes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Laboratory Test ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Diagnostic Error ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Physician Order Entry ◽  
Test Ordering

Abstract Background Inappropriate laboratory test ordering poses an important burden for healthcare. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been cited as promising tools to improve laboratory test ordering behavior. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of an intervention that integrated a clinical decision support service into a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on the appropriateness and volume of laboratory test ordering, and on diagnostic error in primary care.Methods This study was a pragmatic, cluster randomized, open label, controlled clinical trial. Setting 280 general practitioners (GPs) from 72 primary care practices in Belgium. Patients Patients aged ≥18 years with a laboratory test order for at least one of 17 indications; cardiovascular disease management, hypertension, check-up, chronic kidney disease (CKD), thyroid disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, fatigue, anemia, liver disease, gout, suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), suspicion of lung embolism, rheumatoid arthritis, sexually transmitted infections (STI), acute diarrhea, chronic diarrhea, and follow-up of medication. Interventions The CDSS was integrated into a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in the form of evidence-based order sets that suggested appropriate tests based on the indication provided by the general physician. Measurements The primary outcome of the ELMO study was the proportion of appropriate tests over the total number of ordered tests and inappropriately not-requested tests. Secondary outcomes of the ELMO study included diagnostic error, test volume and cascade activities.Results CDSS increased the proportion of appropriate tests by 0.21 (95% CI 0.16 - 0.26, p<.0001) for all tests included in the study. GPs in the CDSS arm ordered 7 (7.15 (95% CI 3.37 - 10.93, p=.0002)) tests fewer per panel. CDSS did not increase diagnostic error. The absolute difference in proportions was a decrease of 0.66% (95% CI 1.4% decrease - 0.05% increase) in possible diagnostic error.Conclusions A CDSS in the form of order sets, integrated within the CPOE improved appropriateness and decreased volume of laboratory test ordering without increasing diagnostic error. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02950142, registered on October 25, 2016Funding source This study was funded through the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE) Trials Programme agreement KCE16011.

scholarly journals Clinical decision support improves the appropriateness of laboratory test ordering in primary care without increasing diagnostic error: the ELMO cluster randomized trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Delvaux ◽  
Veerle Piessens ◽  
Tine De Burghgraeve ◽  
Pavlos Mamouris ◽  
Bert Vaes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Laboratory Test ◽  
Clinical Decision Support ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Diagnostic Error ◽  
Order Sets ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Physician Order Entry ◽  
Test Ordering

Abstract Background Inappropriate laboratory test ordering poses an important burden for healthcare. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been cited as promising tools to improve laboratory test ordering behavior. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of an intervention that integrated a clinical decision support service into a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on the appropriateness and volume of laboratory test ordering, and on diagnostic error in primary care. Methods This study was a pragmatic, cluster randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial. Setting Two hundred eighty general practitioners (GPs) from 72 primary care practices in Belgium. Patients Patients aged ≥ 18 years with a laboratory test order for at least one of 17 indications: cardiovascular disease management, hypertension, check-up, chronic kidney disease (CKD), thyroid disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, fatigue, anemia, liver disease, gout, suspicion of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), suspicion of lung embolism, rheumatoid arthritis, sexually transmitted infections (STI), acute diarrhea, chronic diarrhea, and follow-up of medication. Interventions The CDSS was integrated into a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) in the form of evidence-based order sets that suggested appropriate tests based on the indication provided by the general physician. Measurements The primary outcome of the ELMO study was the proportion of appropriate tests over the total number of ordered tests and inappropriately not-requested tests. Secondary outcomes of the ELMO study included diagnostic error, test volume, and cascade activities. Results CDSS increased the proportion of appropriate tests by 0.21 (95% CI 0.16–0.26, p < 0.0001) for all tests included in the study. GPs in the CDSS arm ordered 7 (7.15 (95% CI 3.37–10.93, p = 0.0002)) tests fewer per panel. CDSS did not increase diagnostic error. The absolute difference in proportions was a decrease of 0.66% (95% CI 1.4% decrease–0.05% increase) in possible diagnostic error. Conclusions A CDSS in the form of order sets, integrated within the CPOE improved appropriateness and decreased volume of laboratory test ordering without increasing diagnostic error. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02950142, registered on October 25, 2016

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document