FRI0461-HPR Trunk stabilizing exercise and strengthening exercises in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: A pilot blinded randomized trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. 745.3-746 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.M. Carmo ◽  
M.F.A. Jacob ◽  
K.S. Takara ◽  
F.G. Santos ◽  
F.A. Caromano ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028259
Author(s):  
Joshua Brodie Farragher ◽  
Adrian Pranata ◽  
Gavin Williams ◽  
Doa El-Ansary ◽  
Selina M Parry ◽  
...  

IntroductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding optimal management. Exercise intervention is the most widely used treatment as it likely influences contributing factors such as physical and psychological. Literature evaluating the effects of exercise on CLBP is often generalised, non-specific and employs inconsistent outcome measures. Moreover, the mechanisms behind exercise-related improvements are poorly understood. Recently, research has emerged identifying associations between neuromuscular-biomechanical impairments and CLBP-related disability. This information can be used as the basis for more specific and, potentially more efficacious exercise interventions for CLBP patients.Methods and analysisNinety-four participants (including both males and females) with CLBP aged 18–65 who present for treatment to a Melbourne-based private physiotherapy practice will be recruited and randomised into one of two treatment groups. Following baseline assessment, participants will be randomly allocated to receive either: (i) strengthening exercises in combination with lumbar force accuracy training exercises or (ii) strengthening exercises alone. Participants will attend exercise sessions twice a week for 12 weeks, with assessments conducted at baseline, midway (ie, 6 weeks into the trial) and at trial completion. All exercise interventions will be supervised by a qualified physiotherapist trained in the intervention protocol. The primary outcome will be functional disability measured using the Oswestry Disability Index. Other psychosocial and mechanistic parameters will also be measured.Ethics and disseminationThis study was given approval by the University of Melbourne Behavioural and Social Sciences Human Ethics Sub-Committee on 8 August 2017, reference number 1 749 845. Results of the randomised controlled trial will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberACTRN12618000894291.


2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 400-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Dengler ◽  
Djaya Kools ◽  
Robert Pflugmacher ◽  
Alessandro Gasbarrini ◽  
Domenico Prestamburgo ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Cecchi ◽  
Raffaello Molino-Lova ◽  
Massimiliano Chiti ◽  
Guido Pasquini ◽  
Anita Paperini ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Saru Singh ◽  
Ruchi Gupta ◽  
Chashamjot Bawa ◽  
Lakshmi Mahajan ◽  
Bhanupreet Kaur ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction Low back pain behaves as a “silent epidemic,” ranking first among complications related to work. Often there is a large gap between a patient's desired pain reduction and the minimum percentage of improvement that would make a treatment worthwhile. Consequently, debate continues as to the value of epidural steroid injections, supremacy of one adjuvant over others, various doses, and concentrations in optimizing pain management. Objective To compare the efficacy of ketamine vs normal saline as an adjuvant to epidural steroids in chronic low back pain. Study design Randomized prospective placebo-controlled study. Materials and methods The study was conducted on 60 patients of age group 18 to 70 years having chronic lower backache with or without radiculitis of minimum 3 months duration and having no relief with conventional treatment. The patients selected were randomly allocated into two groups of 30 patients each: Group I (n = 30) given triamcinolone 40 mg, preservative-free ketamine 30 mg (0.6 mL) made up to 6 mL solution with 0.25% bupivacaine and group II (n = 30) given 0.6 mL normal saline instead of ketamine. Outcome measures The primary outcome measured was number of patients requiring repeat blocks and number of repeat blocks administered in 3 months. Other outcome measures were functional improvement quantified by visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) as well as improvement in psychological status by depression scoring, all taken at 2 weeks interval for 3 months. The periprocedural complications were also noted at the end of the study. Results In managing lumbar radicular pain with lumbar epidural steroid injection (LESI), ketamine's role as an adjuvant proved to be advantageous for long-term relief by its inhibition of dorsal horn “wind up” phenomenon through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonism, thus reducing frequency of repeat blocks in group II (ketamine). Conclusion Thus to conclude, ketamine's advantage as a drug that prolongs pain relief from LESI is an avenue for further research and promises a bright future in the field of interventional pain medicine. How to cite this article Gupta R, Bawa C, Singh S, Mahajan L, Kaur B, Kaur T. Prospective Placebo-controlled Randomized Trial to compare the Efficacy of Ketamine as an Adjuvant to Epidural Steroids in preventing Repeat Blocks in Chronic Low Back Pain. Curr Trends Diagn Treat 2017;1(1):15-21.


2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Azadinia ◽  
Ismail Ebrahimi-Takamjani ◽  
Mojtaba Kamyab ◽  
Mohamad Parnianpour ◽  
Morteza Asgari ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (19) ◽  
pp. 2185-2191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena Niemistö ◽  
Tiina Lahtinen-Suopanki ◽  
Pekka Rissanen ◽  
Karl-August Lindgren ◽  
Seppo Sarna ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document