Sacrectomy with Ilio-Lumbar Stabilization Due to Low-Grade Chondrosarcoma of Sacrum and Iliac Wing. Case Report of the First Surgery Performed in the Republic of North Macedonia

Low - grade chondrosarcomas are primary malignant bone tumors that are resistant to chemo- and radiotherapy and are treated surgically. Sacral localization makes surgical resection technically difficult due to position, anatomic structures involved, and large tumor size at detection. The risk of complications is high. We present the introduction of a novel surgical technique in our country, sacrectomy with ilio-lumbar stabilization. This was performed on a 67-year-old man with low-grade chondrosarcoma of the sacrum with sacroiliac joint involvement. The procedure was performed via an antero-posterior approach in two stages. Ilio-lumbar fixation with a mesh cage bridge was used to obtain spinopelvic continuity and stability. Sacrectomy is a technically demanding procedure that requires careful preoperative planning and a multidisciplinary approach, as well as high level of surgical experience.

Lumbar Stabilization with DSS-HPS® System: Radiological Outcomes and Correlation with Adjacent Segment Degeneration

Arthrodesis has always been considered the main treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. Adjacent segment degeneration is one of the major topics related to fusion surgery. Non-fusion surgery may prevent this because of the protective effect of persisting segmental motion. The aims of the study were (1) to describe the radiological outcomes in the adjacent vertebral segment after lumbar stabilization with DSS-HPS® system and (2) to verify the hypothesis that this system prevents the degeneration of the adjacent segment. This is a retrospective monocentric analysis of twenty-seven patients affected by degenerative lumbar disease underwent spinal hybrid stabilization with the DSS-HPS® system between January 2016 and January 2019. All patients completed 1-year radiological follow-up. Preoperative X-rays and magnetic resonance images, as well as postoperative radiographs at 1, 6 and 12 months, were evaluated by one single observer. Pre- and post-operative anterior and posterior disc height at the dynamic (DL) and adjacent level (AL) were measured; segmental angle (SA) of the dynamized level were measured. There was a statistically significant decrease of both anterior (p = 0.0003 for the DL, p = 0.036 for the AL) and posterior disc height (p = 0.00000 for the DL, p = 0.00032 for the AL); there were a statistically significant variations of the segmental angle (p = 0.00000). Eleven cases (40.7%) of radiological progression of disc degeneration were found. The DSS-HPS® system does not seem to reduce progression of lumbar disc degeneration in a radiologic evaluation, both in the dynamized and adjacent level.

Analysis of the influence parameters spine-pelvic balance on the risk of development degeneration and degenerative disease of adjacent segments after lumbar spine rigid fixation

Introduction An increase in the load on adjacent segments causes changes in the parameters of the spinal-pelvic balance and, as a consequence, the development of the so-called biomechanical «stress». Such pressures are a key link in the pathogenesis of degeneration, and in the presence of clinical and neurological manifestations of the latter and adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD/ASDd).Objective of this study was to assess the effect of the parameters of the spinal pelvic balance on the risk of developing ASD/ASDd after dorsal decompression-stabilizing interventions (DDSI).Material and Methods The study included medical records of patients who underwent DDSI for lumbar spine degenerative diseases. Clinical and instrumental parameters were assessed.Results Based on the inclusion criteria, 98 patients (48 with signs of ASD/ASDd and 50 without) were included in the study. The average postoperative follow-up period for the respondents was 46.6 ± 9.8 months. If PI/ LL parameters were <10 and the ratio of segmental and global lumbar lordosis (LIV-SI/LI-SI) was 50% or more, the incidence of ASD/ASDd was significantly lower in patients who underwent rigid lumbar stabilization surgery.Conclusion The values of PI/LL parameters and the ratio of segmental and global lumbar lordosis are obvious risk factors for the development of ASD/ASDd after rigid lumbar spine DDSI.

Comparison of Mckenzie approach versus Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain

Introduction: Lumbar stabilization and McKenzie exercises are becoming a popular trend for managing chronic low back pain though it is currently not known whether lumbar stabilization exercises produce better results in improving functional status compared to McKenzie approach. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the McKenzie approach versus lumbar stabilization in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Material & Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. Lottery method was used to randomly divide individuals who fulfilled inclusion criteria into 2 groups. Assessments of the patients were done in OPD. Baseline assessment was done on day 1 and post intervention assessment was done after 2 weeks. A total of 8 treatment sessions spread across 2 weeks were given (4 days per week). Data were assessed at baseline level and post intervention. Data was entered and analysed by SPSS version 21. Results: A total of 28 females and 02 males (mean age of 50.88 ±12.29) participated in the study. After 02 weeks of intervention, both treatment groups showed improvement in decreasing pain and improving functional status. The lumber stabilization group showed significant gains on Numeric Pain Rating Scale and (p=0.001) and Modified Oswestry Disability Index (p=0.001) compared to the Mckenzie group. Conclusion: Patients in both lumber stabilisation and McKenzie groups showed significant improvement, however, the patients in lumbar stabilization group were superior than the patients in McKenzie group on the selected outcomes.