scholarly journals AB0376 DETERMINANTS AND PROTECTIVE EFFECTS OF A LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY STATE IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS: RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE CHINESE COHORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1488-1489
Author(s):  
Y. Hao ◽  
L. Ji ◽  
D. Gao ◽  
Y. Fan ◽  
E. F. Morand ◽  
...  

Background:The concept of treat to target in systemic lupus erythematosus has moved forward in recent years. The Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) defined by the Asia-Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) in 2016 has been validated prospectively in the APLC cohort itself and retrospectively in multiple other cohorts.Objectives:The concept of treat to target in systemic lupus erythematosus has moved forward in recent years. The Lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS) defined by the Asia-Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) in 2016 has been validated prospectively in the APLC cohort itself and retrospectively in multiple other cohorts. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and determinants of achieving LLDAS, and the influence of LLDAS on short term outcomes including disease flare and damage accrual in Chinese lupus patients.Methods:The baseline and follow-up data of all consecutive patients in a longitudinal lupus cohort from January 2017 to December 2018 were collected prospectively. SLEDAI-2K, PGA and disease flare were assessed at each follow-up visit, and further compared to the previous routine clinical visits. Irreversible disease damage was captured using the SLICC damage index and the short form (36) health survey for health-related quality of life was completed annually.Results:One hundred and forty-nine patients were enrolled, with the median disease duration at recruitment of 2.4 (0.9–8.2) years, and median follow-up of 15.4 (10.1-18.2) months. By the end of the study, 104 (69.8%) patients achieved LLDAS at least once; 59 patients achieved LLDAS for≥50% of observations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age at disease onset< 30 years (OR=0.05, 95%CI [0.01-0.59], p=0.017), 24-hour urine total protein (UTP) level at recruitment (OR=0.9992, 95%CI [0.9987-0.9998], p=0.007), and C3 level (OR=1.004, 95%CI [1.001-1.008], p=0.024) had independent associations with achieving LLDAS for≥50% of all observations (Table 1). During follow-up, 56 (37.6%) patients experienced disease flare including 14 (9.4%) patients with severe flare. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed significant differences in flare rates according to whether LLDAS was achieved and the percentage follow-up time in LLDAS (Figure 1). Multivariate cox analysis revealed that the percentage time of time in LLDAS was an independent negative determinant of disease flare (HR=0.18, 95% CI [0.07-0.48], p=0.001) (Table 2). There were 16 (15.0%)/107 patients who had damage accrual after one year of follow-up. Multivariate logistic analysis showed a tendency for achieving LLDAS during follow-up being protective for damage accrual (OR=0.27, 95%CI [0.07-1.00], p=0.050).Conclusion:In this Chinese early disease cohort, LLDAS was an attainable goal in clinical practice. Age at onset, UTP and C3 level at recruitment influenced achievement of LLDAS. LLDAS was negatively associated with disease flare and damage accrual; this needs to be confirmed by future longer follow-up.Acknowledgments:The data in this cohort was collected and recorded using the framework of the lupus low disease activity status (LLDAS) study from the Asia-Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC).Disclosure of Interests:Yanjie Hao: None declared, Lanlan Ji: None declared, Dai Gao: None declared, Yong Fan: None declared, Eric F. Morand Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Speakers bureau: AstraZeneca, Mandana Nikpour: None declared, Zhuoli Zhang: None declared

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Ardian Saputro ◽  
Santi Andayani ◽  
Stefanie Yuliana Usman ◽  
Laniyati Hamijoyo

Background: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with heterogeneous clinical manifestations including fatigue. Previous studies aimed at proving the relationship between fatigue and SLE disease activity showed conflicting results. In 2015, Asia Pacific Lupus Collaboration (APLC) developed low disease activity criteria, named Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS). Patients who spend more time in LLDAS have significantly lower morbidity. This study aimed to evaluate the association between disease activity based on LLDAS and fatigue.    Methods: This is a analytical cross-sectional study. Subjects were SLE patients at rheumatology clinic in Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung during June-January 2018. Subjects were evaluated based on LLDAS criteria and divided into 2 groups: LLDAS and non-LLDAS. Fatigue status of the subjects was assessed with Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). Results: A hundred and thirty-three subjects were included in this study, divided into 63 subjects in LLDAS group and 60 subjects in non-LLDAS group. Nineteen subjects (30.2%) in LLDAS group had fatigue and 39 subjects (65%) in non-LLDAS had fatigue. There was a significant association between LLDAS and fatigue (p< 0.001). Nonetheless, fatigue level in LLDAS group was still high since disease activity was not the only factor related to fatigue. Fatigue may be a distinct clinical manifestation of neuropsychiatric lupus and may be independent of lupus disease activity Conclusions: There was a significant association between LLDAS and fatigue showed by lower fatigue level was found in the LLDAS group than in the non-LLDAS group.   Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus, disease activity, Lupus Low Disease Activity State, fatigue


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 263.2-263
Author(s):  
A. R. Cunha ◽  
L. Saraiva ◽  
J. A. P. Da Silva ◽  
L. Inês

Background:Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) is a target for management of patients with SLE, that should be maintained in the long-term by preventing flares. Stratification of flare risk would be useful to optimize management.Objectives:To identify predictors of flare in SLE patients attaining LLDAS.Methods:Patients with SLE fulfilling classification criteria [ACR (1997) and/or SLICC and/or EULAR/ACR], followed at an academic lupus clinic from January 2017 to March 2020 were eligible. Baseline for each patient was the first visit with LLDAS within the study period. Patients never fulfilling LLDAS were excluded. Flares were identified as change from baseline by 3 instruments: revised SELENA flare index (r-SFI); SLEDAI-2K; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS). Time to first flare up to 36 months was identified separately for each instrument. Predictors of flare were sought through survival analysis, with distinct models for each of the three definitions of flare. Univariate analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meir curves and Log-Rank tests. Tested variables at baseline were: gender; age at time of SLE diagnosis; disease duration; cumulative SLE organ involvement (arthritis; mucocutaneous; renal; neurologic; haematological; anti-phospholipid syndrome); cumulative immunological features (anti-dsDNA; anti-Sm; anti-RNP, anti-phospholipid antibodies; hypocomplementemia); ongoing treatment (hydroxychloroquine; prednisone; immunosuppressants). Variables with p<0.1 were further tested in multivariate Cox regression models. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).Results:From 322 patients in this SLE cohort, 292 (90.7%) fulfilled LLDAS and were included in the analyses (female: 87.3%; mean age: 46.2±14.5 years; previous lupus nephritis: 36.0%; receiving ongoing antimalarials, immunosuppressants, glucocorticoids: 92.8%, 34.6% and 29.8%, respectively. Over follow-up, the proportion of patients with flares according to each definition were: 28.4% (r-SFI), 24.7% (SLE-DAS) and 13.4% (SLEDAI-2K). The r-SFI flares were moderate in 28.9% and severe in 9.6% of the cases. From all patients, 54.1% maintained stable glucocorticoid-free control of the disease, without flares during follow-up. In the multivariate models, the following parameters were independent predictors of flare, as defined by any of the definitions (Table 1): anti-RNP+; oral glucocorticoids; immunosuppressants.Conclusion:Patients attaining LLDAS but requiring ongoing treatment with immunosuppressants and/or glucocorticoids present a higher risk of flare and thus might need a tighter clinical monitoring. Anti-RNP+ was newly identified as a potential biomarker for higher risk of flares. Glucocorticoid-free, stable low disease activity is an achievable target.References:[1]Mathian A, Pha M, Haroche J, Cohen-Aubart F, Hié M, Pineton de Chambrun M, et al. Withdrawal of low-dose prednisone in SLE patients with a clinically quiescent disease for more than 1 year: a randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(3):339-46.[2]Inês L, Duarte C, Silva RS, Teixeira AS, Fonseca FP, da Silva JA. Identification of clinical predictors of flare in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a 24-month prospective cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(1):85-9.Table 1.Predictors of flare in multivariate Cox regression according to each of the flare definitions (r-SFI; SLE-DAS; SLEDAI-2K)r-SFISLE-DASSLEDAI-2KAnti-RNP+2.11 (1.30-3.42)2.39 (1.44-3.95)2.22 (1.11-4.42)Immunosuppressants1.96 (1.22-3.15)2.32 (1.38-3.88)2.26 (1.12-4.54)Prednisone*1.93 (1.19-3.14)1.99 (1.18-3.35)2.17 (1.07-4.38)Blood cytopenias§2.08 (1.03-4.17)n.s.n.s.Arthritis§n.s.n.s.2.23 (1.12-4.44)* Prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day as required by LLDAS. § Blood cytopenias; arthritis: cumulative SLE features up to baseline. Risk for each predictor reported as Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence Interval); n.s.: non-significantDisclosure of Interests:None declared


RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil ◽  
Guillermo J Pons-Estel ◽  
Luis M Vila ◽  
Gerald McGwin ◽  
Graciela S Alarcón

AimsTo determine whether the proportion of time systemic lupus erythematosus patients achieve remission/low disease activity state (LDAS) is associated with a better quality of life (QoL).Patients and methodsPatients from a well-established multiethnic, multicentre US cohort were included: remission: Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM) score=0, prednisone≤5 mg/day and no immunosuppressants); LDAS not in remission, SLAM score≤3, prednisone≤7.5 mg/day, no immunosuppressants; the combined proportion of time patients were in these states was the independent variable. The endpoints were the Physical and Mental Components Summary measures (PCS and MCS, respectively) and the individual subscales of the Short Form (SF)-36 at the last visit. Linear regression was used to estimate the association between the proportion of follow-up time in remission/LDAS and the SF-36 measures with and without adjustment for possible confounders.ResultsFour hundred and eighty-three patients were included. The per cent of time on remission/LDAS was associated with better QoL after adjusting for potential confounders; for the PCS the parameter estimate was 9.47 (p<0.0001), for the MCS 5.89 (p=0.0027), and for the subscales they ranged between 7.51 (p=0.0495) for mental health and 31.79 (p<0.0001) for role physical.ConclusionsThe per cent of time lupus patients stay on remission/LDAS is associated with a better QoL as measured by SF-36.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 1299-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel F. Ugarte-Gil ◽  
Daniel Wojdyla ◽  
Guillermo J. Pons-Estel ◽  
Rosana Quintana ◽  
José A. Gómez-Puerta ◽  
...  

Objective.To determine the predictors of remission and low disease activity state (LDAS) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods.Three disease activity states were defined: Remission = SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) = 0 and prednisone ≤ 5 mg/day and/or immunosuppressants (maintenance dose); LDAS = SLEDAI ≤ 4, prednisone ≤ 7.5 mg/day and/or immunosuppressants (maintenance dose); and non-optimally controlled state = SLEDAI > 4 and/or prednisone > 7.5 mg/day and/or immunosuppressants (induction dose). Antimalarials were allowed in all groups. Patients with at least 2 SLEDAI reported and not optimally controlled at entry were included in these analyses. Outcomes were remission and LDAS. Multivariable Cox regression models (stepwise selection procedure) were performed for remission and for LDAS.Results.Of 1480 patients, 902 were non-optimally controlled at entry; among them, 196 patients achieved remission (21.7%) and 314 achieved LDAS (34.8%). Variables predictive of a higher probability of remission were the absence of mucocutaneous manifestations (HR 1.571, 95% CI 1.064–2.320), absence of renal involvement (HR 1.487, 95% CI 1.067–2.073), and absence of hematologic involvement (HR 1.354, 95% CI 1.005–1.825); the use of immunosuppressive drugs before the baseline visit (HR 1.468, 95% CI 1.025–2.105); and a lower SLEDAI score at entry (HR 1.028, 95% CI 1.006–1.051 per 1-unit decrease). These variables were predictive of LDAS: older age at entry, per 5-year increase (HR 1.050, 95% CI 1.004–1.098); absence of mucocutaneous manifestations (HR 1.401, 95% CI 1.016–1.930) and renal involvement (HR 1.344, 95% CI 1.049–1.721); and lower SLEDAI score at entry (HR 1.025, 95% CI 1.009–1.042).Conclusion.Absence of mucocutaneous, renal, and hematologic involvement, use of immunosuppressive drugs, and lower disease activity early in the course of the disease were predictive of remission in patients with SLE; older age was predictive of LDAS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document