scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of Practolol, a New Cardioselective Beta-blocking Agent in Angina Pectoris

BMJ ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 2 (5706) ◽  
pp. 399-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Sandler ◽  
G. A. Clayton
1967 ◽  
Vol 5 (22) ◽  
pp. 85-86

Verapamil (Cordilox - Pfizer; iproveratril*), described by the manufacturers as a mild beta-blocking agent, is promoted as an important new compound for the long-term control of angina pectoris.1 It is claimed that, unlike other beta-blocking agents which reduce the response of the heart to sympathetic stimulation, verapamil induces neither coronary vasoconstriction nor broncho-spasm and is less likely to provoke low-output cardiac failure. These unwanted effects are an unavoidable consequence of intense beta receptor blockade, and (although the manufacturers attribute the advantages to a direct relaxation of plain muscle) their absence suggests that the action of verapamil may depend not on beta receptor blockade but on other mechanisms. The claims for verapamil of advantages over potent beta-blocking agents are clearly aimed at propranolol (Inderal - ICI), the only one available for clinical use. We discussed propranolol in 1965.1


1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Borer ◽  
M B Comerford ◽  
E Sowton

Ten patients with typical angina pectoris and without hypertension, congestive heart failure or other disease were treated with alternating four-week courses of metoprolol ( a β1 cardioselective beta-blocking agent), propranolol and placebo. Midway through each four-week period, drug dosage was doubled; thus, regimes were metoprolol, 150 and 300 mg/day, propranolol, 120 and 240 mg per day and placebo, 3 and 6 tablets per day. Serum concentrations of metoprolol increased with increasing dosage in a proportion very similar to that seen with propranolol. Statistically significant reductions in angina frequency/nitroglycerin consumption, and statistically significant increases in total work performed on a bicycle ergometer, were found with both active compounds when compared with placebo. No significant differences were noted between the two active compounds. Though most patients showed greatest improvement on the higher of the two drug dosages, three patients with metoprolol and two with propranolol responded best on the lower dose regime. Both compounds reduced heart rate at rest and during exercise. Neither reduced arterial pressure at rest, but both reduced arterial pressure during excercise. It is concluded that metoprolol is as effective as propranolol in the reduction of angina attacks and improvement in exercise tolerance during chronic therapy in patients with uncomplicated angina pectoris. It is now appropriate to study the effects of metoprolol in patients with coronary artery disease in whom the harmful effects of non-selective beta-blockade heretofore have precluded optimal therapy with beta-blocking drugs.


1977 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Åström ◽  
B. Jonsson

Beta-blocking agents with partial agonist activity seem to reduce heart rate at rest slightly less than those without this property. Cardio-selective drugs have no effect on stroke volume at rest contrary to the non-selective ones which will reduce it somewhat. This difference is abolished during exercise. The only difference seen during work between different beta-blockers is the effect on the peripheral vascular resistance. The selective drugs lower the arterial pressure with unchanged resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document