scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a meta-analysis

BMJ ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 309 (6950) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Leizorovicz ◽  
G Simonneau ◽  
H Decousus ◽  
J P Boissel
1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (02) ◽  
pp. 195-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
J N Fiessinger ◽  
M Lopez-Fernandez ◽  
E Gatterer ◽  
S Granqvist ◽  
A Kher ◽  
...  

SummaryThe aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily subcutaneous injection of dalteparin, a low molecular weight heparin, with that of intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Patients were included if they had deep venous thrombosis distal to inguinal ligament and were randomised either before, if it was considered necessary, or after phlebographic verification of the diagnosis. There was no pre-inclusion treatment with unfractionated heparin. One hundred and twenty patients received dalteparin, administered subcutaneously once-daily at a fixed dose of 200 IU anti-factor Xa/kg, and 133 patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin (UFH). Oral anticoagulation was started on the first or second day, and initial treatment with dalteparin or UFH discontinued when the prothrombin time was in the therapeutic range (2<INR<3) on two consecutive days. Control phlebograms were taken within 4 days, thereafter. There were no significant differences between the two initial treatment groups in improvements in Marder score. Two major bleeding events occurred in the UFH group versus none in the dalteparin group. One patient in each group experienced clinically significant pulmonary embolism. During a mean follow-up period of 6.9 ± 1.5 months, recurrent DVT occurred in four patients in the dalteparin group and in two of the UFH group. These results confirm those of a previous study on dalteparin in the initial treatment of DVT, and suggest that dalteparin administered once-daily at a fixed dose of 200 UI/kg is as effective and well-tolerated as UFH in patients with DVT below the inguinal ligament. The present study also demonstrates that dalteparin can be started as soon as the diagnosis of DVT is suspected and without pre-treatment with UFH. Given that the administration of once-daily subcutaneous injections needs not require a patient to be hospitalised, studies to investigate the possibility of using dalteparin for the initial treatment of DVT in the outpatient setting are warranted.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 18-26
Author(s):  
Sylvia Haas

SummaryThe therapy of deep venous thrombosis consists of several elements and depends on the localization, the age and the extent of the thrombus. In addition, the patient’s age and the life expectancy may influence the modality of treatment. The present overview discusses various types of initial therapy and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism and also reviews future perspectives of pharmacological treatment. The initial treatment regimens comprise thrombolysis, thrombectomy, inferior vena cava filters and the anticoagulation with either unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparins. Thrombolysis is only effective in the initial phase of acute thromboembolic disorders, and the potential benefits must be balanced against the risk of hemorrhage. In the case of totally occlusive venous thrombosis, a successful outcome is more likely if the thrombolytic agent is infused into the thrombus via catheter directed thrombolysis. Thrombectomy should be considered in patients with acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis of less than seven days duration and a life expectancy of more than ten years. A filter device should be inserted in the inferior vena cava in patients with venous thrombosis above the knee when anticoagulation is contraindicated or when adequate anticoagulation fails to prevent recurrent embolism. The intravenous administration of unfractionated heparin has been the modality of choice for initial treatment of venous thromboembolism during several decades, however, this type of therapy requires an aPTT-adjusted dosing due to a broad interindividual variation of laboratory results. Numerous clinical trials have provided firm evidence that low molecular weight heparins given subcutaneously are significantly superior to intravenous, unfractionated heparin with regard to thrombus regression and reductions of severe hemorrhages, mortality and recurrent thromboembolism. Thus, these preparations may become the treatment of choice in the near future. Pulmonary embolism may be treated with low molecular weight heparins as well.Long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism is usually performed with oral anticoagulants. The recommended therapeutic range is an INR of 2.0 to 3.0, however the optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with acute proximal deep venous thrombosis is uncertain.Various thrômbin-inhibitors have been tested for initial treatment of thrombosis, however further investigations of their efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness will have to provide firm evidence on their superiority when compared to unfractionated or low molecular weight heparins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document