scholarly journals Roles and responsibilities of medical expert witnesses

BMJ ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 331 (7512) ◽  
pp. 305-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Friston
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Deborah Rutt ◽  
Kathyrn Mueller

Abstract Physicians who use the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) often serve as medical expert witnesses. In workers’ compensation cases, the expert may appear in front of a judge or hearing officer; in personal injury and other cases, the physician may testify by deposition or in court before a judge with or without a jury. This article discusses why medical expert witnesses are needed, what they do, and how they can help or hurt a case. Whether it is rendered by a judge or jury, the final opinions rely on laypersons’ understanding of medical issues. Medical expert testimony extracts from the intricacies of the medical literature those facts the trier of fact needs to understand; highlights the medical facts pertinent to decision making; and explains both these in terms that are understandable to a layperson, thereby enabling the judge or jury to render well-informed opinions. For expert witnesses, communication is everything, including nonverbal communication that critically determines if judges and, particularly, jurors believe a witness. To these ends, an expert medical witnesses should know the case; be objective; be a good teacher; state opinions clearly; testify with appropriate professional demeanor; communicate well, both verbally and nonverbally; in verbal communications, explain medical terms and procedures so listeners can understand the case; and avoid medical jargon, finding fault or blaming, becoming argumentative, or appearing arrogant.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Rika Susanti

AbstrakPemanfaatan ilmu kedokteran forensik dalam penegakan hukum serta keadilan membutuhkan dokter sebagai saksi ahli medis di persidangan. Saksi ahli pada dasarnya adalah seseorang yang memiliki pengetahuan, pengalaman dan keahlian khusus sebagai dasar dalam memberikan keterangan ahli suatu perkara pidana. Kewajiban dokter untuk membuat keterangan ahli diatur dalam Kitab Undang-undang Acara Pidana dan dalam etika kedokteran. Kehadiran dokter sebagai saksi ahli dapat diminta oleh jaksa penuntut ataupun penasehat hukum tersangka atas persetujuan hakim. Dokter dapat menjadi saksi fakta (dokter yang merawat) atau saksi pendapat (ahli independen) tergantung keterangan yang dibutuhkan pengadilan. Dalam memberikan keterangan ahli, dokter harus mengikuti ketentuan yang berlaku di persidangan Indonesia, sehingga penting bagi dokter untuk mengetahui tata cara dan sikap dokter sebagai saksi ahli dan mengikuti pedoman menjadi saksi ahli kedokteran.Kata kunci: Dokter sebagai aksi ahli, dasar hukum, persidangan, pedoman saksi ahliAbstractThe utilization of forensic medical science in law enforcement and justice requires a medical doctor as an expert medical witness in court. An expert witness is basically a person who has knowledge, experience and special skill as a basis in providing expertise which is caused a criminal. The obligation of the doctor to make expert explanation is arranged in the book of the law in the crime and in medical ethics.The presence of the doctor as an expert witness can be requested by the prosecutor or the lawyer of the suspect upon approval the judge. Doctors can be as a witness of fact (the treating doctor) or as a witness of opinion (the independent expert witness), depending on the information needed at the court. In providing expert information, the doctor should follow the applicable provisions in Council of Indonesia, so it is important for the doctor to know the ordinances and the attitude of doctors acting as medical witnesses.Keywords: Doctors as medical expert witnesses,legal basis, court, guidelines for expert witness.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith J. B. Rix

SummaryAlthough medical experts are valued in the administration of justice, the cases in the UK of Meadow and others, including most recently Pool, have all contributed to understandable anxiety on the part of doctors who carry out court work. This article uses an in-depth analysis of these cases and details of some other medical regulatory cases to draw out some lessons for potential medical expert witnesses. Although the most recent judgment in Pool leaves a number of unanswered questions, steps are identified that may be taken to reduce the risk of regulatory investigation by the General Medical Council.


The Lancet ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 353 (9169) ◽  
pp. 2076
Author(s):  
Rose Irwin

Author(s):  
Emma Tratschler

This article is underscored by the importance of expect witnesses on court cases but also the realisation that expert witnesses are often beyond the means of those who need them. An analogy is drawn between the pro bono work that legal practitioners must do and the idea that medical practitioners can serve as expert witnesses as part of their pro bono work. This article will critically evaluate whether medical practitioners should be required to give themselves a certain number of pro bono hours to serve as expert witnesses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document