Religious support for assisted dying: we must not gamble with vulnerable people’s lives in changing the law

BMJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. n2510
Author(s):  
Brendan McCarthy
2020 ◽  
pp. 096853322098263
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Wicks
Keyword(s):  

This article seeks to reframe the issue of assisted dying in terms of English law’s broader regulation of suicide. It identifies a long-standing ambiguity about the role of the law in respect of suicide, notwithstanding its decriminalisation in the Suicide Act 1961. Reviewing the passage of that Act and subsequent judicial and parliamentary involvement, the article identifies some pertinent unanswered questions such as whether suicide can ever be viewed as a legitimate exercise of autonomy; whether assistance in performing suicide should ever be lawful; and when exactly there is a legal duty on others to intervene to prevent a suicide. It is argued that until such questions are addressed directly in the broader context of suicide, the appropriate legal approach to assisted dying cannot be settled.


Author(s):  
Julian Savulescu ◽  
Dominic Wilkinson

This chapter discusses consequentialism. There are two broad schools of ethical theory: consequentialism and non-consequentialism. According to consequentialism, the right act is that act which has the best consequences. According to non-consequentialism, the rightness of an action is not solely determined by its consequences. The most famous version of non-consequentialism is deontology, which holds that an individual has an absolute duty to obey certain rules. Medical law exists at the intersection between consequentialism and deontology. Much of medical law is consequentialist in nature. However, having evolved from a set of Christian values and principles, it retains certain deontological characteristics. In particular, it retains a commitment in many jurisdictions to the Sanctity of Life Doctrine, though this is being shed or modified as assisted dying becomes legalized. The chapter finishes with a description of some examples of the influence of consequentialism over current medical law.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Jennifer Sprinks
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-81
Author(s):  
Frank Cranmer

The issue of assisted suicide has been a matter of considerable controversy. On 9 December 2008 the incoming Director of Public Prosecutions, Keir Starmer QC, announced that he would not prosecute Mark and Julie James for taking their son Daniel, paralysed as a result of a rugby accident, to an assisted-dying clinic in Switzerland. At the same time, Margo MacDonald MSP has been attempting to change the law in Scotland, where assisting the suicide of another is a common law offence. During the Lords committee stage of the Coroners and Justice Bill Lord Falconer moved a new clause to make it legal to help another to travel to a country in which assisted dying was lawful, in circumstances where that person had made a formal declaration of intent to travel abroad in order to die and two doctors, independent of each other, had certified that that person was terminally ill and had the necessary mental capacity to make the declaration. For the Government, Lord Bach said that Ministers felt that the Bill was not the appropriate vehicle for changing the law on assisted suicide and suggested that if Falconer wished to pursue the matter further he should do so through a Private Member's Bill – and the new clause was duly defeated by 194 votes to 141.


Thorax ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-350
Author(s):  
M. A. Branthwaite
Keyword(s):  

BMJ ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 342 (apr21 2) ◽  
pp. d2355-d2355 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Tallis
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayne Hewitt ◽  
Ben White ◽  
Katrine Del Villar ◽  
Lindy Willmott ◽  
Rebecca Meehan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document