scholarly journals Covid-19: Quebec to tax the unvaccinated as vaccine mandates spread in Europe

BMJ ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. o112
Author(s):  
Owen Dyer
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
BRUCE K. DIXON
Keyword(s):  

The Lancet ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 397 (10276) ◽  
pp. 791
Author(s):  
Rajaie Batniji

Author(s):  
Charlesnika T. Evans ◽  
Benjamin J. DeYoung ◽  
Elizabeth L. Gray ◽  
Amisha Wallia ◽  
Joyce Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Healthcare workers (HCWs) are a high priority group for COVID-19 vaccination and serve as sources for information for the public. This analysis assessed vaccine intentions, factors associated with intentions, and change in uptake over time in HCWs. Methods A prospective cohort study of COVID-19 seroprevalence was conducted with HCWs in a large healthcare system in the Chicago area. Participants completed surveys (November 25, 2020-January 9, 2021 and April 24-July 12, 2021) on COVID-19 exposures, diagnosis and symptoms, demographics, and vaccination status. Results Of 4,180 HCWs who responded to a survey, 77.1% indicated they intended to get the vaccine; in this group, 23.2% had already received at least one dose of the vaccine (23.2%), 17.4% were unsure, and 5.5% reported that they would not get the vaccine. Factors associated with intention or vaccination were being exposed to clinical procedures (vs no procedures) and having a negative serology test for COVID-19 (vs no test) (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=1.39, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.16-1.65, AOR=1.46, 95% CI 1.24-1.73, respectively). Nurses (vs physicians, AOR=0.24 95% CI 0.17-0.33), non-Hispanic Black (vs Asians, AOR=0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.59), and women (vs men, AOR=0.38, 95% CI 0.30-0.50) had lower odds of intention to get vaccinated. By 6-months follow-up, over 90% of those who had previously been unsure were vaccinated, while 59.7% of those who previously reported no intention of getting vaccinated, were vaccinated. Conclusions COVID-19 vaccination in HCWs was high, but variability in vaccination intention exists. Targeted messaging coupled with vaccine mandates can support uptake.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Joanne Kaldy
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-107026
Author(s):  
Michael Kowalik

Proponents of vaccine mandates typically claim that everyone who can be vaccinated has a moral or ethical obligation to do so for the sake of those who cannot be vaccinated, or in the interest of public health. I evaluate several previously undertheorised premises implicit to the ‘obligation to vaccinate’ type of arguments and show that the general conclusion is false: there is neither a moral obligation to vaccinate nor a sound ethical basis to mandate vaccination under any circumstances, even for hypothetical vaccines that are medically risk-free. Agent autonomy with respect to self-constitution has absolute normative priority over reduction or elimination of the associated risks to life. In practical terms, mandatory vaccination amounts to discrimination against healthy, innate biological characteristics, which goes against the established ethical norms and is also defeasible a priori.


Vaccine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 2517-2521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. deSante ◽  
Arthur Caplan ◽  
Frances Shofer ◽  
Amy J. Behrman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document